Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education inspection (EIF)

CQM Training And Consultancy Limited

Inspected 23 Feb 2024 · published 5 Jun 2024 · URN 1276409

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Feb 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Abdul Miah, Alison Whatsize, Ann Minton, Michael Worgs, Saher Nijabat

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall AI-checked

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    CQM Training And Consultancy Limited

  • URN verified

    1276409

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−24Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesupportivesafehigh-qualitykeenconfidentlysuccessfullyeffectivetimely
Criticismnot yettoo manyweaknessnot alwaysinconsistenttoo fewnot consistentlylimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings610w−30
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve74w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
658
shorter than usual (typical 1228)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 40
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Safeguarding 1%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 40%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Inspection of CQM Training And Consultancy Limited

p.1

Inspection dates: 20 to 23 February 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Apprenticeships Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Information about this provider

CQM Training & Consultancy Ltd (CQM) is an independent learning provider with its head office based in Chesterfield. Most apprentices are employed with medium to large employers throughout England. CQM teaches most apprentices online or at their employer’s sites.

p.1

Information about this provider

At the time of the inspection, there were 350 apprentices. All apprentices are adults. Leaders mainly offer a broad range of continuous improvement apprenticeships from level 2 to level 6. The majority of apprentices study the level 4 improvement practitioner and level 3 food technologist apprenticeship standards. There are no apprentices in receipt of high-needs funding. The provider does not work with any subcontractors. 20 to 23 February 2024

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Apprentices, who remain in learning, attend their lessons well. They are professional and are keen to complete their apprenticeship and achieve high grades.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Most apprentices are satisfied with the support and training they receive. They value the supportive and safe learning environment created by staff. This makes them keen to do their best and actively take part in learning activities provided by staff.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Apprentices are safe at work and understand the importance of health and safety regulations in the high-risk environments in which they work. For example, food technologist apprentices are very aware of the food safety risks and hazards that can affect them at work. They wear appropriate personal protective equipment and can confidently complete risk assessments to keep themselves and their colleagues safe at work.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Apprentices value the supportive culture created by staff. They appreciate the regular access they have to staff who provide one-to-one support and swift help with their studies when they need it.

p.2

better?

Too many apprentices withdraw from their course, and managers are not always clear about the reasons for this. As a result their actions have not yet resulted in any substantial improvement in the retention and achievement of apprentices. The majority of apprentices who remain in learning successfully achieve their apprenticeship, and around half achieve distinction grades.

p.2

better?

The improvement activities leaders and managers have implemented to improve the quality of training apprentices receive are not yet effective. They have not yet analysed and used information from their observations to provide appropriate staff training. This means inconsistent teaching of English and mathematics, for example, remains a weakness.

p.2

better?

The planning and teaching of English and mathematics are not yet good. Staff do not ensure that apprentices receive timely support. Apprentices do not develop the English and mathematics skills they need for their next steps and too many do not achieve their qualifications.

p.2

better?

Leaders ensure that staff are suitably qualified and experienced to teach the curriculum. However, staff do not benefit from enough training to improve their teaching skills, including teaching online. Leaders are aware of this and have suitable plans in place to implement appropriate training. It is too early to see the impact of these actions.

p.2

better?

Most apprentices produce written work to a good standard. They link their written work to the improvement activities and projects they complete in their workplace. 20 to 23 February 2024

p.2

3

Leaders and managers do not ensure that apprentices receive high-quality, impartial careers advice and guidance. Too few apprentices are clear on the range of wider opportunities available to them on completion of their course.

p.3

3

Leaders do not develop apprentices’ wider interests and talents sufficiently. Leaders do not provide appropriate support and guidance to help apprentices maintain their physical health and well-being. They do not, for example, know how to develop good sleep patterns after night shifts in order to stay healthy.

p.3

3

Apprentices do not understand fundamental British values sufficiently well. Staff introduce British values during apprentices’ induction but do not consistently discuss this in reviews or lessons. As a result, too many apprentices do not understand how this applies to their daily roles at work.

p.3

3

Leaders and managers are considerate of staff workload and well-being. They ensure that staff are given appropriate caseloads and meet frequently with them to provide good support. They provide flexibility for staff to work from home where appropriate. As a result, staff feel valued and supported.

p.3

3

Governors are well-qualified and experienced, but the targets set by governors are not yet robust enough to drive rapid improvement in the retention and achievement of apprentices.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Improve oversight and accuracy of key management information.  Ensure staff plan and teach English and mathematics well on their courses.  Improve careers guidance to include advice about future career options.  Implement an appropriately planned personal development curriculum. 20 to 23 February 2024

p.3

Provider details

Address Unit 6 Dunston Innovation Centre Dunston Road Chesterfield S41 8NG

p.4

Provider details

Principal, CEO or equivalent Andy Cheshire

p.4

Provider details

Provider type Independent learning provider

p.4

Provider details

Date of previous inspection 17 to 20 September 2019

p.4

Provider details

Main subcontractors None 20 to 23 February 2024

p.4

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the Quality and Compliance Manager, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.5

Inspection team

Michael Worgs, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Saher Nijabat His Majesty’s Inspector Abdul Miah Ofsted Inspector Alison Whatsize Ofsted Inspector Ann Minton Ofsted Inspector Mark Care Ofsted Inspector 20 to 23 February 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion