Summary
Ashley Hinson (lead), Lisa O’Donovan, Sara Stoker
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Mar 2024
- Inspectors verified
Ashley Hinson, Lisa O’Donovan, Sara Stoker
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Postcode verified
TN17 3JD
- Name on report verified
Cranbrook School
- URN verified
SC060354
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In one particular instance, a risk assessment relating to sleeping arrangements was not sufficiently clear or detailed in relation to how staff will monitor children to prevent bullying, despite bullying having been a known concern. p.3
- This includes a lack of training in some areas and an inconsistent approach to monitoring boarding practice. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- School leaders should ensure that a night-time fire drill takes place annually in each boarding house. p.5
- School leaders should ensure that approaches to the use of consequences are consistent and reasonable across all boarding houses. p.5
- School leaders should ensure that when references are obtained as part of the recruitment process, these are appropriately verified. p.5
- School leaders should ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the sleeping arrangements in boarding houses, considering privacy and risks. p.5
- School leaders should ensure that staff receive good regular reviews of their boarding practice, with opportunities for training and continual professional development in boarding. p.5
- School leaders should ensure that approaches to medication recording further reduce the potential for errors. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance23
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good” p.1Communication & language2
“There are adults and professionals available for children to talk to.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,492
- shorter than usual (typical 2096)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for boarding school: Cranbrook School 1 Cranbrook School Cranbrook School Academy Trust Cranbrook School, Waterloo Road, Cranbrook, Kent TN17 3JD
p.1
Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this boarding school
Cranbrook School is a co-educational state funded boarding and day grammar school in the market town of Cranbrook, Kent. Founded in 1518, the school converted to an academy in 2012. There are six separate boarding houses; some are on the school campus and some are a short walking distance from the main teaching site. At the time of inspection, there were 221 boarders. The boarding provision caters for girls and boys aged 13 to 18 years.
p.1
Information about this boarding school
The inspectors only inspected the social care provision at this school.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The boarding school is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: outstanding Inspection report for boarding school: Cranbrook School 2
p.1
improvement to be good
Children who board at this school mostly benefit from doing so. They are mainly positive about their experiences and the support that they receive from staff. However, several significant shortfalls in respect of leadership and management and health and safety have led to a judgement of requires improvement to be good. Although recent changes provide assurance that leaders and managers have the capacity to oversee the necessary improvements, some shortfalls had not been identified by the leadership team.
p.2
improvement to be good
Children feel listened to. Leaders and managers encourage them to share their views. However, some children and some staff do not know who the independent listener is. Consequently, the safeguarding function of the independent listener is significantly reduced.
p.2
improvement to be good
The systems for managing the administration of medication are inconsistent across the boarding houses. Senior leaders have already recognised this and have an improvement plan. Medication is managed effectively in some of the boarding houses, however, there are occasions when medication is not recorded accurately, which could lead to errors.
p.2
improvement to be good
The accommodation provided for one year group in one boarding house includes internal CCTV facing some external doors. There has been little reflection on whether the safeguards provided by these cameras could be achieved in a less intrusive way.
p.2
improvement to be good
There is a well-planned transition and welcome process for new children when they first join. This includes open days, orientation on arrival and a family and boarders event during the first weekend. Plans to support children when they leave the school help to ensure that they are well prepared for the next stage of their education.
p.2
improvement to be good
Children are supported with their schoolwork. This includes senior boarders mentoring younger boarders and additional support for children to do preparatory work in a calm and quiet space.
p.2
improvement to be good
Children benefit from healthy and nutritious meals that meet their dietary preferences and cultural needs. The school council has made suggestions about the food which have influenced changes.
p.2
improvement to be good
Children enjoy shared activities and games. They benefit from a good range of experiences, including a wide range of interesting clubs and sporting activities. Inspection report for boarding school: Cranbrook School 3
p.2
improvement to be good
Leaders and managers generally take appropriate action in response to concerns. There are areas that require improvement for children to receive consistently good enough help and protection.
p.3
improvement to be good
A small number of children were identified as having experienced bullying.in the boarding houses. Feedback from children about the effectiveness of responses to bullying is mixed. While leaders have been active in attempting to prevent bullying, in at least one instance this has persisted. In one particular instance, a risk assessment relating to sleeping arrangements was not sufficiently clear or detailed in relation to how staff will monitor children to prevent bullying, despite bullying having been a known concern.
p.3
improvement to be good
Some staff report a lack of confidence or consistency in managing behaviour. There is a lack of training in respect of managing bullying. Managers recognise this but at the time of the inspection had yet to provide training for staff.
p.3
improvement to be good
The use of consequences is inconsistent across the boarding houses. This means that there are varying expectations for children and their experiences of behaviour management differ. The leadership team is aware of this and is in the process of developing a working group to review approaches to the use of consequences.
p.3
improvement to be good
The safeguarding leads identify and monitor risks, including low-level concerns. When concerns are identified that require liaison with the local authority designated officer, these are shared appropriately.
p.3
improvement to be good
Safeguarding leads are alert to risks relating to criminal exploitation. When these are identified, they are shared promptly with the appropriate authorities. Staying in boarding has helped one child to become significantly safer.
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff manage incidents of self-injurious behaviour well. Children are provided with support from in-house and external services as necessary. Children have access to a counselling service and a medical centre on site. There are adults and professionals available for children to talk to.
p.3
good
The director of boarding is carrying out this role in addition to their substantive role as a head of house. This does not provide enough capacity to oversee the service effectively. Lines of accountability are not always clear. These shortfalls have been recognised by new leaders and managers and plans are in place to make changes.
p.3
good
The new senior management team is aware of most of the areas of concern. However, several issues, including fire-safety concerns, were not known until they Inspection report for boarding school: Cranbrook School 4 were identified by inspectors. The response to these concerns during the inspection provided assurance that there is the capacity to take the necessary action. However, there have been several areas where improvement is necessary and internal monitoring arrangements have not identified shortfalls. Leaders and managers were unaware that actions identified in fire risk assessments as high priority had not been completed. In addition, there are no records of the actions taken in response to electrical safety checks. During the inspection, an action plan was devised and shared with the local fire service.
p.3
good
Leaders and managers have not ensured that all required safer recruitment checks are consistently carried out. Although references are gathered as part of the recruitment process, the information is not always verified with the person who has provided the reference.
p.4
good
Leaders and managers have not ensured that staff always receive the support necessary to help them carry out their roles effectively. This includes a lack of training in some areas and an inconsistent approach to monitoring boarding practice. This has contributed to some staff dissatisfaction and staff having concerns about their capacity to provide a good service. In addition, despite the school’s policies referring to the importance of a trauma-informed approach, several boarding staff are unfamiliar with the concept and have not had training in this approach.
p.4
good
Leaders and managers are child focused. Several recent changes have been made in response to children’s requests and suggestions. For example, children asked for more flexible approaches to spending time with friends who were not boarding. This was acted on. Leaders and managers also supported the creation of a girls’ football team.
p.4
good
There is a good approach to tolerance, equality and diversity. Special days celebrate different cultures and raise awareness of heritage, background and culture. Inspection report for boarding school: Cranbrook School 5
p.4
schools
The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for boarding schools:
p.5
schools
The school complies with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 and ensures alerting systems are accessible and there are clear evacuation plans for all children subject to their needs. (Boarding schools: national minimum standards 10.2) The school premises, accommodation and facilities provided therein are maintained to a standard such that, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of pupils are ensured, and they are provided a safe environment in which they can live and learn. (Boarding schools: national minimum standards 9.2) Any instances of bullying are dealt with effectively. Staff take steps to help pupils to overcome the impact of bullying. All school staff are trained to recognise bullying and know who to go to, if required, in order to ensure bullying is dealt with. (Boarding schools: national minimum standards 16.2) The school identifies at least one person other than a parent, outside the staff,
p.5
schools
and those responsible for the leadership and governance of the school, who children may contact directly about personal problems or concerns at the school. This person may be known as the ‘independent person’. Children know who this person is, know how to contact them and feel comfortable talking to them. The person is easily accessible. (Boarding schools: national minimum standards 11.4)
p.5
Points for improvement
School leaders should ensure that a night-time fire drill takes place annually in each boarding house. School leaders should ensure that approaches to the use of consequences are consistent and reasonable across all boarding houses. School leaders should ensure that when references are obtained as part of the recruitment process, these are appropriately verified. School leaders should ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the sleeping arrangements in boarding houses, considering privacy and risks. School leaders should ensure that staff receive good regular reviews of their boarding practice, with opportunities for training and continual professional development in boarding. School leaders should ensure that approaches to medication recording further reduce the potential for errors. Inspection report for boarding school: Cranbrook School 6
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under The Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for boarding school: Cranbrook School 7
p.6
Boarding school details
Social care unique reference number: SC060354
p.7
Boarding school details
Headteacher/teacher in charge: David Clark
p.7
Boarding school details
Email address: reception@cranbrook.kent.sch.uk
p.7
Inspectors
Ashley Hinson, Social Care Inspector Sara Stoker, Social Care Inspector Lisa O’Donovan, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for boarding school: Cranbrook School 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion