Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Mary Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Apr 2024
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Postcode verified
TN37 6EU
- Name on report verified
St Mary Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
114574
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They respond positively to praise, to additional challenge, and to the high expectations of staff. p.1
- Staff are positive about the support of leaders and are proud of their important work as a close-knit team. 23 and 24 April 2024 p.1
- As a result, they enjoy books and are happy to share their preferred authors and discuss their likes and dislikes, often linked to the set texts they explore together as a class. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In discussions with the inspector, pupils acknowledged that behaviour is not always perfect, though were clear that when friendships do break down, they need to play their own part in making things better. p.1
- In some foundation subjects, the school’s curriculum planning does not define clearly enough the key knowledge and skills that pupils need to know and develop. p.3
- Where this is the case, teachers are not as clear about what they need to teach or what pupils already know and can do. p.3
- The school knows that some subjects need to be refined further to ensure that the way learning is sequenced over time helps pupils to build securely on what they already know and can do. p.2
- Pupils relish additional challenge because they understand that mistakes sometimes need to be made in order to build future success. p.2
- Leaders need to complete this work as a matter of urgency. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language3
“Pupils talk about their enjoyment of being ‘creative’.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,247
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 60, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: St Mary Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School Magdalen Road, St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex TN37 6EU
p.1
Outcome
St Mary Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School continues to be a good school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have a very clear understanding of the values of their school. Their attendance has improved significantly during the last year. They respond positively to praise, to additional challenge, and to the high expectations of staff. Pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds are supported well here, as are those with English as an additional language. As a result, classrooms are purposeful places where pupils from a wide range of backgrounds achieve increasingly well.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Older pupils are acutely conscious of their responsibility to set positive examples for younger peers. They are openly proud of the multicultural aspect of their friendships. They feel that they have a voice and are confident in expressing their feelings and opinions when asked.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
In discussions with the inspector, pupils acknowledged that behaviour is not always perfect, though were clear that when friendships do break down, they need to play their own part in making things better. One freely offered quote during a discussion with pupils new to the school was that there are no ‘full-time’ bullies here. Those who have been at the school longer agree. They feel that the school is a safe place to be and that any worries are dealt with quickly by staff.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
This is a good and improving school. Much progress has been made since the school’s last inspection. Leaders at all levels, including those in positions of governance, have ensured that there is a clear upward trajectory over time. The school’s ongoing work with the local English and mathematics hub schools is paying dividends. Positive partnerships with other schools are also benefiting staff and pupils alike. Staff are positive about the support of leaders and are proud of their important work as a close-knit team. 23 and 24 April 2024
p.1
2
The curriculum is evolving. The school intends that it closely matches the needs and aspirations of the diverse community of pupils it serves. A programme of revision is under way. The school knows that some subjects need to be refined further to ensure that the way learning is sequenced over time helps pupils to build securely on what they already know and can do.
p.2
2
Pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), benefit from tailored and timely support when needed. Much of this happens in the classroom without additional fuss. Some is delivered in collaboration from professionals from outside the school. Pupils new to the country, many with English as an additional language, are also supported well.
p.2
2
Children get off to a good start in the early years. They work and play together well. Staff are attentive and understand the individual needs of children. The school’s work to teach pupils to read starts in Reception. It has been revised and strengthened recently. Staff have attended a range of additional training to support them to teach phonics. Classroom visits showed a high degree of consistency in the way that the programme is delivered. Pupils who are in danger of falling behind are supported well because staff have a sound understanding of their progress.
p.2
2
Older pupils also benefit from a well-organised programme to support their reading and love of the written word. As a result, they enjoy books and are happy to share their preferred authors and discuss their likes and dislikes, often linked to the set texts they explore together as a class.
p.2
2
Pupils are equally positive about their work as mathematicians. The school has worked hard to develop the way pupils support each other in their learning. Classroom visits show that this aspect is increasingly successful in mathematics lessons. Pupils relish additional challenge because they understand that mistakes sometimes need to be made in order to build future success. Because of this, they are increasingly confident to share their work with their peers, free from the worry of negative judgements when their answers are not quite right.
p.2
2
The programme to support pupils’ wider development is a strength of the school. This is firmly built on the school’s Catholic ethos and equally valued by those from different faiths and backgrounds. Pupils talk about their enjoyment of being ‘creative’. Older pupils are excited about their impending residential trip and the challenges this will bring in the form of outdoor adventure.
p.2
2
Parents are positive about what they see as equal opportunities for all and the school’s focus on nurture and the well-being of pupils. Boys like to dance here. Girls enjoy competitive sports against other schools. Respect flows freely between pupils and staff. People are allowed to have a sense of humour. Kindness is the norm.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 23 and 24 April 2024
p.2
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some foundation subjects, the school’s curriculum planning does not define clearly enough the key knowledge and skills that pupils need to know and develop. Where this is the case, teachers are not as clear about what they need to teach or what pupils already know and can do. End points are not as well defined as they could be, meaning that pupils are not as prepared as they might be as they move on to secondary education. Work has started on a review of foundation subjects. Some of this work is complete. Some is still ongoing and now needs further refinement. Leaders need to complete this work as a matter of urgency. This will ensure that all staff have a clear understanding of the key knowledge and skills that pupils need across all curriculum subjects as they move through the school year on year.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in February 2019.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.3
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with SEND; pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school 23 and 24 April 2024
p.3
4
meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 23 and 24 April 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Website www.st-mary-star.e-sussex.sch.uk
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 12 and 13 February 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
This is a voluntary-aided Roman Catholic primary school in the Diocese of Arundel and Brighton. The school also works closely with the local authority. The school’s last section 48 inspection took place in November 2021. The school does not use alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in his evaluation of the school. The inspector held a wide range of meetings with leaders at all levels, as well as teaching and support staff. He met with the chair of the governing body, accompanied by two other governors. He also talked to representatives of the diocese and the local authority on the telephone. 23 and 24 April 2024
p.5
6
The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and geography. For each deep dive, the inspector held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. He heard some pupils read to a known adult. He also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects with leaders. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of parents, leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspector gathered evidence to explore the impact of pupils’ behaviour, the school’s wider curriculum offer and how leaders support staff with their workload. Pupils were talked to throughout the inspection to gain their views about the school.
p.6
6
The inspector also held a formal meeting with a representative group of pupils. The inspector considered the views of parents submitted through Ofsted Parent View. The views of staff were also considered through Ofsted’s staff survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Clive Close, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 23 and 24 April 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion