Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Wigan St Andrew's CofE Junior and Infant School
Summary
David Spruce (lead), Steven Rooney
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 Apr 2024
- Inspectors verified
David Spruce, Steven Rooney
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
WN6 7AU
- Name on report verified
Wigan St Andrew's CofE Junior and Infant School
- URN verified
106449
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, older pupils have not achieved as well as they should have done. p.2
- The school has recently raised its expectations for what pupils should learn. p.2
- The school has ensured that new subject curriculums are typically designed to break down what pupils need to know into small, logical steps of knowledge that build over time. p.2
- Overall, the school is still getting to grips with how new curriculum materials are designed and how they should be delivered. p.2
- Children do not learn all that they should to make the best possible start when they move into Year 1. p.3
- Some of these pupils do not receive the help that they need to access their learning. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion8
“However, the needs of other pupils with SEND are overlooked.” p.3Progress & outcomes6
“However, older pupils have not achieved as well as they should have done.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,490
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 31%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Wigan St Andrew's CofE Junior and Infant School Mort Street, Springfield, Wigan, Lancashire WN6 7AU
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 16 and 17 April 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has recently raised its expectations for what pupils should learn. This includes for some pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). In some instances, this is beginning to bear fruit. For example, younger pupils’ achievement is starting to improve. However, older pupils have not achieved as well as they should have done. Their recent attainment and progress in English and mathematics has been well below the national average by the end of Year 6. In part, this is owing to historic weaknesses in curriculum design and delivery. These weaknesses are slowly being resolved.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy the wider opportunities that they have at this school. Play leaders enjoy getting out the ‘red box’ of equipment to organise skipping, hoop and bat and ball games during social times. Pupils spoke positively about the several sports clubs and ‘confidence club’ that some of them access. Pupils also get to learn a brass instrument which culminates in a performance as a brass band.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils feel happy and safe. They get along well with their classmates and have positive relationships with their teachers. They said that staff and kind are caring. Pupils enjoy their learning. However, their lessons are sometimes disrupted by the behaviour of others. Pupils particularly value the school’s nurture room where they can go to if they need any emotional support.
p.2
better?
The school has recently introduced a suite of changes to its curriculum. In most subjects, the school has adopted a new curriculum to help ensure that pupils experience a broad and balanced offer of education.
p.2
better?
The school has ensured that new subject curriculums are typically designed to break down what pupils need to know into small, logical steps of knowledge that build over time. In some subjects, this is starting to help teachers to deliver curriculum content in a more effective manner. There are emerging signs that pupils are beginning to form a more secure body of knowledge in some of these subjects.
p.2
better?
Overall, the school is still getting to grips with how new curriculum materials are designed and how they should be delivered. In some instances, the school has not implemented these new subject curriculums well. Occasionally, subject curriculums are not delivered as they are intended. This issue is compounded by a lack of subject expertise within the school. This means that some deficiencies in curriculum implementation are not being identified and addressed. Pupils do not acquire some of the knowledge and skills that the school expects for them. In some subjects, their understanding of important concepts is superficial.
p.2
better?
The early years curriculum is a work in progress. Some parts of this curriculum are ill-defined. The school does not make strong connections between what children 16 and 17 April 2024
p.2
3
learn in the Reception Year and future learning in key stage 1. Children do not learn all that they should to make the best possible start when they move into Year 1.
p.3
3
The school is developing its approaches to checking what pupils know and remember over time. In many subjects, the school is not currently well placed to identify and then respond to some of the gaps that pupils have in their learning.
p.3
3
In some instances, the school identifies pupils with SEND early. The school often ensures that pupils with more complex SEND get appropriate specialist support when it is needed. However, the needs of other pupils with SEND are overlooked. Some of these pupils do not receive the help that they need to access their learning. The school has limited strategies in place to adapt the delivery of the curriculum for these pupils. As such, some pupils with SEND do not achieve well.
p.3
3
The school has started to consider new ways to promote a love of reading. It has seen an improvement in the number of Year 1 pupils who meet the phonics screening check. That said, the school’s chosen phonics programme, like other aspects of the curriculum, is not delivered consistently well. Some pupils do not read books that match their current reading skills and knowledge of sounds. Consequently, some pupils do not become fluent readers as soon as they otherwise might.
p.3
3
Pupils are being prepared well for life in modern Britain. Their view of the world is being broadened through reading well-chosen texts that help them to appreciate people’s different cultures and backgrounds. They develop their ability to foster safe, healthy relationships. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe online. They know how to look after their bodies and manage some of their feelings. Their personal development is enhanced through wider opportunities such as a residential visit and a trip to a water sports centre.
p.3
3
The school is currently redefining its systems, policies and expectations for how pupils should conduct themselves during the school day. In lieu of clearer procedures, there is some variability in how well the school deals with occasional disagreements and low-level disruptions to learning. Pupils in some classes behave more positively than they do in some others. From time to time, pupils’ learning is negatively impacted.
p.3
3
The school is reviewing its actions to promote higher rates of attendance at school. Although this work is in its infancy, most pupils do attend school regularly.
p.3
3
Governors are effective in their roles. They provide effective challenge and strategic direction. They have managed recent changes to leadership and staffing appropriately. They have clear capacity to make further improvements at the school. Staff have positive regard for the actions of interim leaders to ensure that staff’s workload is manageable. For example, staff appreciate the extra time that they are given to carry out additional duties.
p.3
4
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The design of the early years curriculum has not been completed. Teachers and subject leaders struggle to connect what children learn during the Reception Year to future learning in key stage 1. Children do not learn all that they could to make a strong start in Year 1. The school should finalise its curriculum thinking, ensuring that clear links are made between the early years and key stage 1 curriculums. Some subject curriculums, and the school’s chosen phonics programme, are not being implemented consistently well. This means that pupils do not develop a secure body of knowledge over time. This also means that some pupils do not become fluent readers as soon as they otherwise could. The school should ensure that staff have the knowledge, guidance and expertise to deliver subject curriculums effectively, and as they are intended. In many subjects, the school does not carry out effective checks on what pupils
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
have learned. This often means that the school is not able to identify and address pupils’ knowledge gaps and misconceptions. The school should ensure that staff have sufficient guidance, and effective strategies, to establish what pupils know and what they might need further help with. The school’s expectations for behaviour are not clearly defined. Pupils’ conduct is inconsistent in some classes. As a result, pupils’ learning is occasionally disrupted. The school should complete its planned overhaul of related systems, routines and policies to ensure that staff consistently uphold high standards of conduct across the school. A proportion of pupils with SEND do not receive effective support to access their learning. As a result, these pupils do not achieve well. The school should ensure that there are appropriate systems in place to identify the additional needs of pupils with SEND and ensure that staff understand these needs. It should also
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
ensure that staff have sufficient knowledge and expertise to adapt the delivery of the curriculum for these pupils. In some cases, the school does not have the requisite level of subject knowledge, expertise and systems to ensure that subject curriculums are implemented well. Consequently, the school is not addressing some deficiencies in how some subject curriculums are being taught. The school should ensure that it oversees the successful implementation of the subject curriculums and develops the skills to respond to the issues with curriculum delivery. 16 and 17 April 2024
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 16 and 17 April 2024
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Headteacher Lindsey Taylor-Heaton (acting headteacher) Website http://www.wiganstandrews.net
p.6
School details
Dates of previous inspection 14 and 15 February 2023, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
There are before- and after-school clubs that operate at the school. They are operated by an external provider. Leaders make use of one unregistered alternative provision for a small number of pupils. The school is a voluntary-aided Church of England primary school. It is part of the Archdiocese of Liverpool. The most recent section 48 inspection of the school’s religious character took place in November 2017. The school is awaiting confirmation from the diocese about its next section 48 inspection. The headteacher, deputy headteacher, assistant headteacher and SENDCo were all in acting, temporary positions at the time of the inspection.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 16 and 17 April 2024
p.6
7
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the second routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors conducted deep dives in these subjects: early reading, geography and mathematics. They met with subject leaders and teachers. They visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work and talked with groups of pupils about their learning. The lead inspector observed pupils read to a familiar adult. The inspectors also considered the curriculum, spoke with pupils about their learning and evaluated their work in some other subjects. The inspectors spoke with a group of governors. The inspectors also talked to staff about their workload and well-being. The lead inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority and the
p.7
7
archdiocese. The inspectors met with the leaders who are responsible for attendance, behaviour and pupils’ personal development. The inspectors spoke with pupils about their wider experience of school. The inspectors looked at a range of policies and documents related to pupils’ welfare and education. They observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff. There were no responses to the survey for pupils. Inspectors made themselves available to parents and carers at the start of the school day and took account of the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including
p.7
Inspection team
David Spruce, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Steven Rooney Ofsted Inspector 16 and 17 April 2024
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion