Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Sandwell Community School
Summary
Richard Wakefield (lead), Russell Hinton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Apr 2024
- Inspectors verified
Richard Wakefield, Russell Hinton
- Postcode verified
B71 2JN
- Name on report verified
Sandwell Community School
- URN verified
135254
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils have strong and positive relationships with staff, who they know want the best for them. p.1
- The school needs to consider how it might adjust the school day to support pupils to access more of the ambitious curriculum being delivered, as well as ensuring that when pupils do arrive in school, they go promptly to lessons so that no learning time is lost. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Attendance and punctuality are not as strong as they need to be. p.3
- Staff help pupils to realise the small actions they need to take to enter their desired career. p.2
- The school should work with staff to develop p.3
- Staff have a strong focus on helping pupils to understand the key vocabulary they need to succeed. p.2
- The school should support teachers to select tasks which match the ambitious curriculum consistently for all pupils and help to close gaps in knowledge. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“Teachers do not always select appropriate work for pupils to complete.” p.3Leadership & governance6
“Governors are clear about the strengths of the school and the areas for improvement.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,343
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Sandwell Community School Westminster Road, West Bromwich, West Midlands B71 2JN
p.1
Outcome
Sandwell Community School continues to be a good school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The majority of pupils enter the school having had long-term disruption to their education. Many have deeply ingrained patterns of poor attendance. When they enter the school through the Assessment Centre of Learning, all pupils are supported to re-engage positively with education. Leaders use initial assessments carefully to decide what pupils need in order to succeed.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Over time, pupils develop increasingly positive attitudes towards education, start to attend more regularly and improve their behaviour. Pupils are encouraged to reflect on their actions. They develop their thinking to consider the consequences of the choices they make on themselves and others and how this will affect their future.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is very ambitious for its pupils. Staff help them to build towards high-quality qualifications or a return to a mainstream school. As a crucial part of this work, many pupils move to the Main School Centre of Learning. They are supported well in this transition. The curriculum on offer allows pupils to experience a wide range of subjects in preparation for their next steps.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have strong and positive relationships with staff, who they know want the best for them. Pupils feel safe and know there is someone to help when they need them, either for educational or personal reasons.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school works hard to understand everything about the pupils they encounter. Leaders have ensured that pupils’ needs are analysed carefully to give them the bespoke support they require. Staff work with parents and carers and external agencies to gather a detailed picture of pupils’ life experience. This includes important background information around attendance and safeguarding. 23 and 24 April 2024
p.1
2
Pupils often arrive with unrecognised or unmet special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). On joining the school, pupils are carefully assessed. All possible barriers to learning are considered, including reading ability and any possible SEND. Through additional funding, the school has been able to do significant work to support those with speech and language needs very successfully. Leaders work effectively to ensure they gather all relevant safeguarding information about their pupils. The school has strong connections with wider agencies, such as the police and youth justice. A range of external support is used to help pupils. This includes a wide array of work to meet pupils’ social, emotional and mental health needs.
p.2
2
The personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education provided is a great help to the pupils. The school’s analytical approach means that the curriculum is carefully built to include aspects that are particularly relevant to pupils and their experiences. Staff also ensure that they are responsive to local issues. These are dealt with in a sensitive and timely manner, using group work and one-to-one support as needed. The personal development work builds strategically and carefully to develop pupils’ understanding of themselves, different relationships and their possible futures. Pupils are supported well to think about their next steps. Staff help pupils to realise the small actions they need to take to enter their desired career. The school ensures that, where possible, pupils can undertake work experience.
p.2
2
There is an ambitious curriculum for all pupils across the three Centres of Learning. Staff have a strong focus on helping pupils to understand the key vocabulary they need to succeed. Teachers know the pupils well. They have constructive relationships with pupils and praise them regularly for their efforts and achievements. Pupils are supported well to engage with their learning on an appropriate level. However, teachers do not always select activities that match the ambitious nature of the planned curriculum. This means that pupils are not always engaged in tasks that help them to build their knowledge effectively.
p.2
2
Pupils express themselves well through their written work in lessons. For example, in English they can write effectively in several different styles. Pupils are encouraged to think and work well together. In mathematics, there is a focus on processes to aid pupils’ understanding. However, sometimes teachers’ delivery of the curriculum does not allow pupils to discuss ideas. This means pupils do not always have as many opportunities as they might to talk about what they are learning, or to develop their confidence in expressing themselves clearly. Leaders are working on developing pupils’ oracy and know the importance of this.
p.2
2
The school is having an influence on local practice and working to improve the quality of information they receive about new and current pupils. While the school has significant challenges with attendance due to pupils’ previous experiences, this is improving. The school is working hard to address the challenges of pupils travelling significant distances, which also has an impact on punctuality. There is work to be done around the school day to make sure that they are in school for long enough and to help pupils engage with education further. 23 and 24 April 2024
p.2
3
Leaders at all levels recognise the challenges of working in this complex environment. Governors are clear about the strengths of the school and the areas for improvement. Recent changes to assessment policy have helped to reduce workload and staff appreciate this.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Teachers do not always select appropriate work for pupils to complete. This results in lost learning time so pupils do not make as much progress through the curriculum as they could. The school should support teachers to select tasks which match the ambitious curriculum consistently for all pupils and help to close gaps in knowledge. Attendance and punctuality are not as strong as they need to be. As a result both of absence and of lateness pupils miss valuable time in lessons. The school needs to consider how it might adjust the school day to support pupils to access more of the ambitious curriculum being delivered, as well as ensuring that when pupils do arrive in school, they go promptly to lessons so that no learning time is lost. Pupils are not always encouraged to express their thinking verbally in lessons. As a result, some remain reticent to do so. The school should work with staff to develop
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
pupils’ skills and confidence to better prepare them for their next steps.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in June 2014.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 23 and 24 April 2024
p.3
4
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 23 and 24 April 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Andrew Moore-Stow
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 16 October 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is a pupil referral unit and works with those pupils who have been, or at risk of being, permanently excluded. The school has four sites and is currently using three of them. The school refers to each site as a Centre of Learning. The school uses six alternative providers for a small number of pupils. Two of them are registered provisions and four are unregistered. A small number of pupils participate in education through online learning. During the previous and current academic year, the school has worked with many pupils and not all of these have entered the school. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 7 to 11 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. The school has received funding through the Department for Education’s Alternative
p.5
Information about this school
Provision Taskforce to provide additional support to pupils, including through speech and language therapy and mentoring. 23 and 24 April 2024
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this ungraded inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors held meetings with the executive headteacher, the chair of governors, the local authority representative, other senior leaders, subject leaders and teachers. They also talked informally to pupils and staff to gather general information about school life. The inspectors carried out deep dives in English, mathematics and PSHE. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning, and looked at
p.6
Information about this inspection
samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors visited all three Centres of Learning that the school has currently open. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors looked at records and spoke to staff in relation to attendance, behaviour and bullying. A range of documentation was scrutinised, including leaders’ plans to improve the school and their self-evaluation of the school’s work. The inspectors took account of responses to the staff survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Richard Wakefield, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Russell Hinton Ofsted Inspector 23 and 24 April 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion