Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Castleford Park Junior Academy

Inspected 10 Apr 2024 · published 24 May 2024 · URN 139359

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tracey Ralph

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Apr 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Tracey Ralph

  • Postcode verified

    WF10 4BB

  • Name on report verified

    Castleford Park Junior Academy

  • URN verified

    139359

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 27% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiouseffectivehigh expectationstrusting relationshipsextremelyproudsuccessfulcaring
Criticisminsufficientseriousdisruptionlackconcernslower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1168w+31
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,170
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Castleford Park Junior Academy Medley Street, Castleford, West Yorkshire WF10 4BB

p.1

Outcome

Castleford Park Junior Academy continues to be a good school.

p.1

Outcome

The headteacher of this school is Kathryn Law. This school is part of Castleford Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, George Panayiotou, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Adam Fletcher.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are proud to attend Castleford Park Junior Academy. Pupils settle well when they start in Year 3 because the school has established a carefully structured, successful transition programme for pupils.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils benefit from the wide range of enrichment activities such as tag rugby, sewing, musical theatre, Spanish club, sign language, baking and Lego club. Pupils are proactive in their leadership roles within the school council, sports council or eco council. For example, pupil councillors raised funds to purchase reusable water bottles and they encouraged their peers to choose reusable cups. Digital leaders go to their partner infant schools to lead internet safety sessions.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils relish opportunities within the curriculum to develop their practical skills and knowledge. Pupils grew maize in forest school, ground it, then made tortillas to eat. Pupils made life-size buggies in design and technology, then applied the knowledge and skills to make go-karts.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school builds trusting relationships with families. Pupils behave extremely well. Relationships between staff and pupils are caring and supportive. This helps pupils to feel happy and safe in school.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has designed a highly ambitious curriculum. Subject leaders access high- quality professional development to develop their expertise. Across the school, and in the Year 6 published outcomes, pupils achieve well. The school uses research evidence to 9 and 10 April 2024

p.1

2

inform its work. Some recent staff training on adaptive teaching has helped the school to refine the curriculum offer in every subject. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) achieve well because of the highly inclusive culture, and effective curriculum adaptations. As a result, most pupils with SEND can access the same lessons as their peers. Parents and carers of pupils with SEND appreciate the high expectations that staff have for their children. By the time they reach Year 6, most pupils achieve at least as well as they should for their age, with an increasing number surpassing this standard.

p.2

2

Most pupils behave well in lessons. A few pupils have specific difficulties with controlling their emotions, but they are supported well. Staff teach pupils to use different strategies that help them to self-regulate. Staff identify individual behaviour triggers for each pupil, so that these can be prevented. The wider inclusion team provides social communication interventions and Lego therapy. They offer additional support outside of the classroom if pupils need a sensory break. If a pupil with additional needs is upset to the point of crisis, the school makes sure that disruption to learning for other pupils is kept to a minimum. These episodes reduce as pupils learn the skills that they need to regulate their own behaviour.

p.2

2

The school assesses reading with Year 3 pupils when they join the school. Any struggling readers are quickly and accurately identified. Phonics lessons start in the second week of term. The school follows a bespoke phonics curriculum, providing reading books that match the sounds that pupils are learning. This combination helps pupils to catch up quickly.

p.2

2

The school has increased the range of books that are available for the most-able pupils. However, the stock of books remains insufficient to meet demand. Most-able pupils find many of the reading books on offer uninspiring. This is putting some pupils off reading. It is also slowing the progress that the most able pupils make and limiting pupils’ opportunities to learn and use more complex vocabulary and sentence structures.

p.2

2

The curriculum for pupils’ wider development is ambitious. The cultural curriculum is enriched by the wealth of specialists who visit the school. Pupils are exposed to a wide range of musical instruments, musical genres and musical theatre. Even the youngest pupils have an impressive knowledge of art that helps them to express their appreciation of different art forms knowledgably.

p.2

2

Pupils have ample opportunities within the curriculum to learn about different faiths, cultures, democracy and rule of law. Pupils have an age-appropriate understanding of protected characteristics and equalities. Leaders promote fundamental British values carefully, to prepare pupils well to be knowledgeable and kind citizens.

p.2

2

Trustees value staff and strive to retain them. Staff feel valued because they are treated with respect by leaders. This includes the many steps leaders have taken to manage staff workload well. 9 and 10 April 2024

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The reading books on offer for the most able pupils lack challenge. This can inhibit pupils’ love of reading and limits the range of new vocabulary that pupils encounter. Most-able pupils are making insufficient progress in reading. They are not achieving as well as they should at the greater depth standard by the end of Year 6. Leaders should ensure that reading books are carefully matched to the abilities and needs of most-able pupils, to provide sufficient challenge, motivate interest and ensure success.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in February 2019.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium 9 and 10 April 2024

p.3

4

funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 9 and 10 April 2024

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 12 and 13 February 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 This school is one of three primary academies in Castleford Academy Trust. There are also two secondary schools in the trust.  Pupils join the school in Year 3.  The school uses no alternative provision.  The proportion of pupils with SEND equates to 30% of the school roll. This is well above the national average.  The school delivers the early career teacher programme through the Education Teacher Hub, which is linked to the University College London accredited provider.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken this into account in her evaluation of the school. 9 and 10 April 2024

p.5

6

 The inspector met the headteacher, the deputy headteachers, the assistant special educational needs coordinators and the inclusion manager. The art and design, reading and mathematics subject leaders met the inspector separately.  A meeting was held with the chair of trustees along with several trustees and governors.  The inspector held discussions with the chief executive and the director of primary for the trust.  The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and art and design. For each deep dive, the inspector met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The inspector met with senior staff who lead the wider curriculum. The inspector also discussed this with pupils, including in single-sex groups.  Pupils’ behaviour and safety were evaluated at breakfast club, in lessons and at

p.6

6

lunchtime.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector reviewed Ofsted Parent View and spoke to several parents before the start of the school day. The inspector also considered responses to the staff and pupil surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Tracey Ralph, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 9 and 10 April 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion