Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Ralph Sadleir School

Inspected 24 Apr 2024 · published 23 May 2024 · URN 140249

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Jonathan Rockey (lead), Sally Nutman, Wayne Jarvis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Apr 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Jonathan Rockey, Sally Nutman, Wayne Jarvis

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    SG11 1TF

  • Name on report verified

    Ralph Sadleir School

  • URN verified

    140249

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−43Criticalmore positive than 4% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiverobustclearrespectfulimprovinghappyfeel safeconfident
Criticismnot alwaysnot consistentlyinconsistencytoo manynot yetlimitednot effectivenot respectful

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1097w−46
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve81w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,156
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of Ralph Sadleir School Station Road, Puckeridge, Ware, Hertfordshire SG11 1TF

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The headteacher of this school is Kerry Scripps. This school is part of Ralph Sadleir Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Kerry Scripps, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Julia Tye. 23 and 24 April 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ experiences at Ralph Sadleir over the past two years have been affected by significant changes in leadership and staff absence. Expectations of pupils have not been commonly understood by staff or pupils. This has meant that there has been inconsistency in the quality of education.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are now beginning to learn and understand; what is expected of them, how they should behave, and the importance of being respectful. This results from recent changes in leadership that have brought about a greater degree of consistency across the school. While too many pupils still do not meet expectations, things are improving. A focus on the school’s new motto ‘students of today, citizens of tomorrow’ encapsulates these changes.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils are happy and attend school regularly. They are keen to point out that they feel safe in school and that bullying is rare. Pupils trust adults to act when they raise a concern. Pupils understand the system for reporting worries.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

A range of extra-curricular activities are available to pupils, including sporting activities. Pupils can work towards the Ralph Sadleir award. This encourages pupil participation across a range of activities, including public speaking.

p.2

better?

The quality of education in some subjects is not yet good because the curriculum is not delivered consistently or sufficiently well. As a result, the quality of work produced by pupils is variable. Pupils’ work is not assessed effectively. Misconceptions and errors in their work are not addressed. Pupils do not respond to the feedback they receive. In a small number of subjects where pupils’ knowledge is checked regularly and precisely, pupils achieve more highly. While informal guidance on curriculum is available for staff, too many teachers have not had specific professional development in this area. Leaders recognise this as a priority.

p.2

better?

The provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is effective. Pupils with SEND make progress that is in line with their peers. There are clear adaptations made for pupils to enable them to access their learning. Adults supporting pupils with SEND in-class receive regular training. As a result, support for pupils is appropriate and focused.

p.2

better?

There is a systematic and rapid approach to identifying those pupils who struggle to read. The programme to support pupils is comprehensive. This starts with phonics in Year 5 and progresses through to ensure that pupils can read fluently the books that interest them. Pupils are confident to read in class.

p.2

better?

Too many pupils do not behave appropriately in class and during unstructured times. Too often, low-level disruption is ignored by staff. This leads to learning being disrupted. Expectations of pupils are not consistently high, and the behaviour policy 23 and 24 April 2024

p.2

3

is not always applied rigorously. Pupils are not always polite or respectful to others in the school community. The view of most pupils and staff is that behaviour is improving quickly. The number of pupils being suspended is falling significantly. Pupils attend school regularly and are typically on time for lessons.

p.3

3

The programme for personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education is delivered through lessons, house group time and assemblies. The school also makes use of external visitors, such as the police, to bring the PSHE programme to life. Pupils do not always value the programme or see its relevance to them. However, the school ensures that pupils can engage with different cultures through visits, such as a Year 8 visit to France.

p.3

3

Turbulence in senior leadership and governance has had a wide-ranging impact on the pupils and school more widely. New leadership has brought about stability and increasing consistency. Leaders now have clear strategic plans for improvement. While these plans are at an early stage, there is already some evidence of impact on pupil behaviour. Governors have a clear understanding of what is required to bring about change. There is still much work to do. External advice is being accessed to support further improvement. Typically, staff are proud to work at the school and can see evidence of change.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The behaviour of some pupils is not yet appropriate. Pupils are not always respectful to one another or staff. This is because the behaviour policy is not applied consistently by all staff, nor are their expectations high enough. As a result, learning is disrupted in some lessons. The school must ensure that the behaviour policy is implemented rigorously across the school to enable all pupils to achieve well.  The delivery of subject content in some subjects is not always ambitious. As a result, there is inconsistency in the quality of work produced by pupils in lessons, and a limited depth of learning. The school should ensure that all staff are robust in their approach to planning and sequencing lessons to ensure that pupils build their knowledge successfully over time.  Assessment in some subjects is not effective. This is because the feedback on pupils’ work is limited in scope and few, if any, checks are made on whether

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

pupils have acted on such feedback. As a result, pupils do not know how well they are achieving or how to improve. The school must ensure that robust structures are in place to provide pupils with the guidance they need to address gaps in knowledge. 23 and 24 April 2024

p.3

4

 Staff have not received sufficient training to enable them to deliver the curriculum effectively. As a result, pupils do not always receive a consistent depth and quality of education. The school must implement rigorously an approach to professional development that enables staff to have consistently effective skills in adapting their teaching to meet the needs of all pupils.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 23 and 24 April 2024

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 18 and 19 October 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The current headteacher has been in post since November 2023.  The school does not make use of any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspectors met with the school’s senior leaders, governors and a representative (via telephone) from the local authority.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in English, mathematics, science and computing. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, 23 and 24 April 2024

p.5

6

visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspection team considered the views of parents and carers through responses to Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors gathered the views of pupils and staff through Ofsted’s pupil and staff surveys, as well as interviews and discussions conducted throughout the inspection.

p.6

Inspection team

Jonathan Rockey, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Wayne Jarvis Ofsted Inspector 23 and 24 April 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion