Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
John Ferneley College
Summary
Paul Halcro (lead), Damian Painton, Emma Mason, Jenny Brown, Ruth Hurcombe
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 Apr 2024
- Inspectors verified
Damian Painton, Emma Mason, Jenny Brown, Paul Halcro, Ruth Hurcombe
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
LE13 1LH
- Name on report verified
John Ferneley College
- URN verified
137617
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There is an ambitious and well-planned curriculum in place for most subjects. p.2
- As a result, the school has not ensured that all pupils consistently receive a high-quality education. p.2
- The school and those responsible for governance have not ensured that there is an ambitious and clear vision for the quality of education that pupils receive. p.2
- Most staff feel well supported by leaders and are proud to work at the school. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The headteacher of this school is Terry Claridge. p.1
- This school is part of Mowbray Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. p.1
- The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Christine Stansfield, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Anne Frost. 16 and 17 April 2024 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment19
“This means teachers do not always address these.” p.2Records & policies3
“Teachers do not always use the behaviour policy well.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,154
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 41%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of John Ferneley College Scalford Road, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire LE13 1LH
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The headteacher of this school is Terry Claridge. This school is part of Mowbray Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Christine Stansfield, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Anne Frost. 16 and 17 April 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Over the last few years, John Ferneley College has experienced several changes to its senior leadership. As a result, the school has not ensured that all pupils consistently receive a high-quality education. Some pupils do not achieve as well as they could. Some parents are dissatisfied with the school. New leaders are clear about what needs to be improved. However, their plans are at an early stage and have yet to have an impact on pupils’ outcomes.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has successfully worked on improving behaviour. Most pupils behave well in lessons. There are positive relationships between staff and pupils. Most pupils are polite and well-mannered. They conduct themselves well during breaks and lunchtimes. However, a few pupils can be boisterous when moving around the school. Pupils feel safe in school. Pupils said that bullying sometimes happens. They are confident that staff would resolve any issues quickly.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have opportunities to contribute to school life. Some are school ambassadors, and some are student leaders. Some pupils enjoy taking part in the school production. There is also a range of after-school sporting clubs that pupils enjoy attending. Pupils in Year 11 appreciate and make good use of after-school revision sessions.
p.2
better?
The school and those responsible for governance have not ensured that there is an ambitious and clear vision for the quality of education that pupils receive. They do not always have a precise understanding of how well the curriculum is delivered. As a result, the school has not addressed some inconsistencies in how teachers deliver the curriculum. New school and trust leaders know this and plan to address the issues quickly.
p.2
better?
There is an ambitious and well-planned curriculum in place for most subjects. However, in some subjects, it is not always clear what key knowledge pupils should learn and in what order. This means the quality of education the school provides is variable.
p.2
better?
Many teachers have good subject knowledge. They present information clearly and check pupils’ understanding. However, this is not done consistently well by all teachers. Some teachers do not check pupils’ understanding carefully enough. They are not always aware of gaps in learning and misconceptions pupils may have. This means teachers do not always address these. Therefore, some pupils do not learn as well as they could.
p.2
better?
Not all teachers ensure that pupils produce high-quality work. Some pupils repeatedly make spelling and punctuation errors. Teachers do not always correct these. This means that some pupils do not develop their writing skills well. 16 and 17 April 2024
p.2
3
The school has ensured that teachers get the information they need to meet the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). In lessons, some pupils with SEND get support from learning support assistants. These staff help pupils access the curriculum. Most pupils with SEND feel well-supported. However, not all teachers adapt their teaching well enough to support pupils with SEND. This means some pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they could. Pupils who need support to improve their reading skills get appropriate help. This is helping these pupils to improve their reading.
p.3
3
There is a clear behaviour system that pupils understand. This has helped to improve behaviour. Most lessons are calm and orderly. Most pupils enjoy their lessons. However, pupils said that not all teachers apply the system consistently well, and sometimes lessons are disrupted by off-task behaviour. Effective systems are in place to ensure that pupils attend school regularly. Pupils with lower attendance get well-thought-out support. This is helping to improve their attendance.
p.3
3
The school has planned well for pupils’ broader development. For example, pupils learn about how to be safe online, cyber-bullying and consent. Pupils understand fundamental British values. They also learn about equality and the importance of respecting others. The careers programme prepares pupils well for their next steps.
p.3
3
Most staff feel well supported by leaders and are proud to work at the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Teachers do not always check pupils’ understanding carefully enough. This means that gaps in learning and misconceptions are not always addressed. As a result, some pupils do not learn as well as they could. Teachers should ensure that they systematically check pupils' understanding to address gaps in learning and misconceptions. Teachers do not always ensure that pupils produce high-quality work. They do not check that pupils spell keywords correctly or that they use correct punctuation. This means that some pupils make errors that are not always corrected, which affects the accuracy of their writing. Teachers should ensure that pupils' writing is of a high quality by checking that they are spelling correctly and using correct punctuation. Teachers do not always adapt their teaching to support pupils with SEND to access the curriculum. This means that some pupils with SEND do not learn as well as they could. Teachers should ensure that they use the information and
p.3
4
strategies they are given to support pupils with SEND so that they can access the curriculum and achieve well. Teachers do not always use the behaviour policy well. They do not always address off-task behaviour. Some pupils think teachers are not always fair when dealing with behaviour issues. The school should ensure that all staff use the behaviour policy consistently. Leaders have not addressed some of the inconsistencies in implementing the curriculum. This means that the quality of education provided by the school is inconsistent. Pupils do not achieve as well as they could. The school should ensure that quality assurance procedures precisely identify how well staff implement the curriculum. They should use this information to support staff to improve their practice.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 16 and 17 April 2024
p.4
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1189
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 17 October 2018
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher was appointed in April 2024. The school is part of Mowbray Education Trust. The school uses one registered and seven unregistered alternative providers. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision. 16 and 17 April 2024
p.5
6
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID 19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors spoke with the headteacher, the assistant headteachers, and other trust leaders. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: mathematics, English, history, geography and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.
p.6
6
Inspectors also discussed the curriculum and visited lessons in some other subjects. Inspectors visited tutorial sessions and an assembly. Inspectors met with groups of pupils from a range of year groups, including pupils with SEND. Inspectors spoke with pupils at break and lunchtime. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free- text responses. Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire. The lead inspector met with a member of the trust board and a member of the local governing committee. The lead inspector met with the trust executive lead for secondaries. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour and break and lunchtimes.
p.6
Inspection team
Paul Halcro, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Ruth Hurcombe Ofsted Inspector 16 and 17 April 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion