Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Hermitage Academy
Summary
Jessica McKay (lead), Karen Gammack, Pali Dhesi, Steve Lewis
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Mar 2024
- Inspectors verified
Jessica McKay, Karen Gammack, Pali Dhesi, Steve Lewis
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DH2 3AD
- Name on report verified
Hermitage Academy
- URN verified
147531
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means that relationships between the school and the community are not as strong as they should be. p.4
- They challenge and support leaders as they should. p.3
- The school should continue to enhance and further embed its curriculum plans to ensure that all pupils achieve the results of which they are capable. p.4
- The school should continue its work to communicate effectively with all stakeholders. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance6
“Leaders are ambitious that all pupils will be successful.” p.3Teaching & assessment5
“Assessment is used consistently by staff.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,146
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Hermitage Academy Waldridge Lane, Chester le Street, County Durham DH2 3AD
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The headteacher of this school is Lindsay Maughan. This school is part of North East Learning Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Lesley Powell, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Margaret Saxton. 12 and 13 March 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
There have been significant improvements at this school. The school has high expectations of how pupils should behave and what they can achieve. Pupils behave well in lessons and understand the school’s behaviour policy clearly. Pupils earn rewards that are exchanged for items such as stationery. They find this motivating. The school is calm and orderly.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The curriculum is well designed and is delivered effectively. Published examination outcomes do not reflect the current quality of education that pupils receive. Pupils in key stages 3 and 4, and students in the sixth form, receive clear careers advice and guidance to enable them to move on to positive destinations.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school provides many opportunities for pupils’ personal development. Pupils participate in a wide variety of extra-curricular activities. For example, they take part in the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award, sporting activities, debate club and drama club. The enthusiasm of pupils in choir rehearsal is palpable. Enrichment activities help to develop pupils’ character and social skills. Pupils have many opportunities to contribute to the life of the school. For example, both the main school and sixth form have head pupils. Some pupils, such as the sports leaders, help to run extra- curricular activities. Other pupils support their peers well. These include the reading ambassadors, who use their training well to develop their younger peers’ reading fluency.
p.2
better?
The school is ambitious that all pupils access a broad curriculum. Recently, the number of pupils studying the English Baccalaureate suite of subjects has increased. The school offers a range of sixth-form courses. The trust has supported the school in its curriculum design. All subjects have clearly sequenced and progressive curriculums in place, including in the sixth form. Many subjects have seven-year-long curriculums. There has been thought about how knowledge and skills build throughout each key stage. Concepts and important vocabulary are frequently returned to in lessons. All lessons begin with recall work on previously learned content. This helps pupils to remember their previous learning. The impact of the teacher’s implementation of the curriculum is demonstrated through pupils’ knowledge, skills and vocabulary. However, published outcomes are lower than the school’s ambition. Some pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable.
p.2
better?
Assessment is used consistently by staff. Frequent questioning and knowledge checks take place in lessons in addition to more formal termly assessments. Pupils receive clear feedback. In some curriculum areas, pupils revisit their work following feedback. Their misconceptions are addressed and progress is secured.
p.2
better?
Reading is prioritised. Pupils read high-quality texts throughout the curriculum. The school ensures pupils’ areas of weakness are identified precisely. Staff deliver a 12 and 13 March 2024
p.2
3
range of interventions to address these areas well. The impact of the interventions is checked. Pupils are making demonstrable progress in their reading skills.
p.3
3
Leaders are ambitious that all pupils will be successful. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are fully included in the school. Their needs are identified and staff are made aware of and use strategies to support pupils in lessons. Pupils with SEND access the same education as their peers. Staff make reasonable adaptations to enable pupils with SEND to access their work.
p.3
3
Students in the sixth form benefit from an ambitious curriculum. Teachers in the sixth form have secure subject knowledge. They support students well in lessons. Students are well prepared for their next steps and the range of post-18 options are made clear to them.
p.3
3
There are high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Staff apply the behaviour policy consistently. The number of suspensions has reduced of late. Suspensions are used appropriately. The vast majority of pupils respond well to the school’s clear routines. Lessons are purposeful and pupils engage in their learning well.
p.3
3
The school has implemented an effective personal development programme. Pupils develop a clear understanding of important issues, such as supportive relationships and individual differences. Pupils discuss fundamental British values and protected characteristics confidently. The social, moral, spiritual, and cultural education of pupils is enhanced through the assembly programme. Pupils develop an understanding of current issues and debates. The curriculum educates pupils from Year 7 to 13 well about their career options.
p.3
3
Governors and trustees have the knowledge and skills they need for their roles. They know the strengths and weaknesses of the school thoroughly. They challenge and support leaders as they should. They visit the school to see first hand what pupils’ educational experiences are like. The school is developing its work on stakeholder engagement, including improving communication with parents and carers. The trust has supported staff with high-quality training. Most staff are positive about the support they receive from school leaders. The vast majority are proud to work at the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 12 and 13 March 2024
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Historically, pupils have not performed as well as they could in external outcomes. This is because previously the curriculum has not been embedded or implemented sufficiently well. The school should continue to enhance and further embed its curriculum plans to ensure that all pupils achieve the results of which they are capable. Some parents within the school community are not as well informed about some of the changes that have taken place at the school. This means that relationships between the school and the community are not as strong as they should be. The school should continue its work to communicate effectively with all stakeholders.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 12 and 13 March 2024
p.4
sixth form
Website http://www.hermitageacademy.co.uk/
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected 12 and 13 March 2024
p.5
Information about this school
The Hermitage Academy converted to become an academy in September 2019. When its predecessor school, also named The Hermitage Academy, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be inadequate overall. The school is part of North East Learning Trust. The school uses two registered alternative provision for a small number of pupils. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-of-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This is the first inspection since the predecessor school, also called The Hermitage Academy, joined the North East Learning Trust (NELT). This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors spoke to the head of school and other senior leaders. They also met with the members of the local academy council, including the chair. Inspectors met with members of the board of trustees. Inspectors also spoke with the chief executive officer of NELT. Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, geography, science, music and art. They met with subject leaders to discuss curriculum planning. Inspectors talked with pupils about what they had learned in these lessons. Inspectors visited lessons, talked with teachers and looked at pupils’ work. Inspectors listened to
p.6
Information about this inspection
pupils read and looked at plans to support those at the early stages of reading. Inspectors also reviewed the mathematics curriculum and looked at mathematics exercise books. Inspectors met with leaders for behaviour and attendance; sixth form; personal, social and health education and careers. Inspectors met with the special educational needs coordinator and scrutinised the information teachers receive about pupils with SEND. Inspectors observed social times and visited spaces allocated to sixth-form pupils. Inspectors spoke with pupils, including sixth-form pupils, both formally and informally, including single-sex groups of pupils. 12 and 13 March 2024
p.6
7
Inspectors spoke to the registered alternative providers used. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including leaders’ evaluation of the school, priorities for improvement and minutes of governors’ meetings. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The views of pupils, parents and staff were considered through discussions and a review of Ofsted’s surveys, including Ofsted Parent View. The inspection team also considered telephone calls that were had with parents during the inspection.
p.7
Inspection team
Jessica McKay, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Karen Gammack Ofsted Inspector 12 and 13 March 2024
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion