Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Willow Park CofE Primary School

Inspected 6 Mar 2024 · published 16 May 2024 · URN 148841

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Darren Preece (lead), Ross Newman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Darren Preece, Ross Newman

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    BS2 8BE

  • Name on report verified

    Willow Park C of E Primary School

  • URN verified

    148841

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−40Criticalmore positive than 32% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseproudeffectivelysafeenjoynurturingfeel safeeffectivesuccessfully
Criticismnot consistentlystruggleweaknesseslimitedgapspoorlytoo lownot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1151w−43
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,129
shorter than usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 53
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection of Willow Park C of E Primary School Park Lane, St Michael’s Hill, Bristol BS2 8BE

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 5 and 6 March 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils do not experience a well-designed curriculum. The school has not developed a curriculum that meets pupils’ needs, including for a large proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language (EAL). As a result, pupils in all key stages have significant gaps in their learning and do not achieve well. Expectations of what pupils can achieve are too low.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel cared for and safe. They behave well and are courteous and kind. However, the curriculum is not ambitious enough and so pupils’ attitudes to learning are not always positive. Pupils become disengaged and distracted in lessons and lose focus on their learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are invested in the school’s vision to ‘be the light’. They enjoy being part of the school council and worship committee. However, there are limited opportunities for pupils to enhance their learning through broader experiences, including trips, visits and extra-curricular clubs.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school knows its community well. It is committed to support families who arrive mid-year and is proud about how it welcomes new children. A ‘new arrivals’ group to support transition is in place, as well as work with local partners to gain a clear understanding of individual family needs.

p.2

better?

The school has not quickly identified the areas of the curriculum that need to be developed or strengthened. It has not identified the important knowledge that pupils should learn across the curriculum. Pupils do not learn the essential knowledge they need to learn more and remember more. For instance, pupils struggle to remember key historical events and have an inaccurate understanding of significant figures, such as John Cabot. Staff do not check what pupils know and can do. As a result, pupils’ prior knowledge is not built on effectively, and misconceptions are not addressed.

p.2

better?

Even though reading has been a main focus for the school, pupils do not read with fluency and confidence. Staff follow the school’s phonics programme, but the school does not consistently check how well pupils apply their knowledge of sounds in their reading. As a result, pupils, including children in the early years, do not learn to read well. They do not achieve the outcomes they need to. Teachers listen to the most disadvantaged pupils and those who speak EAL read regularly, but they do not develop pupils’ ability effectively to decode and blend words precisely enough.

p.2

better?

The school has recently developed new sequences of learning in mathematics. However, inconsistencies in how staff use mathematical vocabulary mean pupils who struggle with language do not develop their understanding securely enough to tackle more complex reasoning and problem-solving activities. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.2

3

The school ensures that pastoral and nurturing support for pupils to feel safe and ready to start school is in place. However, leaders do not adapt the curriculum sufficiently well to help pupils who speak EAL to develop their language skills. Staff do not understand how to break down barriers to learning, so pupils are not able to learn well across the curriculum.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive timely support. The school is developing an approach to meet the needs of pupils when they start school. Pupils with SEND receive targeted help to learn at the appropriate level. However, they do not progress quickly enough to build on their prior knowledge and skills.

p.3

3

The personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) curriculum details what pupils need to learn. However, pupils’ understanding of the fundamental British values is limited. This means they are not well prepared for life in modern Britain. Nonetheless, pupils are proud to be members of various school committees and understand how to stay safe online and be healthy.

p.3

3

Governors understand that the school needs to improve. They have recently engaged in external advice to strengthen the strategic direction of the school. However, this has not had a significant impact on pupils’ outcomes. Pupils are not receiving the education they need to achieve their full potential.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The curriculum is poorly designed. Pupils do not build knowledge and skills over time to help them to learn the curriculum successfully. The school must ensure that the curriculum in all subjects identifies the essential knowledge and skills pupils need to learn.  Pupils struggle to apply their knowledge of sounds in their reading. Staff do not consistently support pupils to read with accuracy. Consequently, pupils do not develop reading fluency. The school must ensure that staff develop pupils’ decoding and blending of words so pupils are able to access more challenging work as they move through the school.  The curriculum is not consistently adapted to meet the needs of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and those who speak EAL. As a result, pupils do not develop their language skills effectively enough. Furthermore, many struggle to learn the wider curriculum, including in PSHE. The school should ensure that the curriculum

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

meets the needs of disadvantaged pupils and those who speak EAL in order for them to achieve success in all aspects of their learning. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.3

4

 Assessment is limited in all areas of the curriculum. Staff lack the knowledge to identify what pupils need to know and where there are gaps in pupils’ understanding. This means that pupils do not get the support they need to achieve well. The school must swiftly design a systematic approach to assessment.  The school has not taken urgent action to address the systemic weaknesses that exist. As a result, pupils do not receive the quality of education they deserve. The school must work with external support to urgently address these weaknesses.  The school may not appoint early career teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 5 and 6 March 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Janet Bremner and Dr Mary Benton (co-chairs) Headteacher Chris Phillips

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 St Michael’s on the Mount Church of England Primary School and St George’s Church of England Primary School formally amalgamated in September 2021 to form what is now known as Willow Park Church of England Primary School.  The school serves a high number of pupils who speak EAL.  The school runs a breakfast club for its pupils.  The school does not use alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held discussions with the headteacher, the assistant headteacher, the special educational needs coordinator, a representative from the local authority and members of the local governing board.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, history and mathematics. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited samples of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in other subjects. These included science and art.

p.6

6

 The lead inspector listened to pupils in Years 1, 2 and 3 read to an adult.  Inspectors looked at a range of policies and documents related to pupils’ welfare and education. They observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interest first.  Inspectors took account of the responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View, including any free-text responses. They also took account of the responses to the staff and pupil surveys and met with parents and carers at the end of the school day.

p.6

Inspection team

Darren Preece, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Ross Newman Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 March 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion