Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Westbridge Academy
Summary
Nathan Lowe (lead), Heather Hann
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
18 Apr 2024
- Inspectors verified
Heather Hann, Nathan Lowe
- Postcode verified
IP1 2HE
- Name on report verified
Westbridge Academy
- URN verified
142808
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils learn to stay safe and develop essential life skills needed for adulthood through the highly effective personal, social and health education (PSHE) programme. p.1
- Pupils receive exceptional support and guidance from adults who care deeply about them. p.1
- There is a shared expectation amongst all adults that pupils will learn the school’s extremely well-designed curriculum. p.2
- The school manages the induction of pupils and their subsequent return to mainstream school exceptionally well. p.2
- Staff are extremely well supported by leaders. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance6
“Staff are extremely well supported by leaders.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,083
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Westbridge Academy London Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP1 2HE
p.1
Outcome
There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might be outstanding if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.
p.1
Outcome
The headteacher of this school is Emily Duque. This school is part of The Raedwald Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Angela Ransby, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Alan Whittaker.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils join Westbridge Academy having experienced significant disruption to their education. Their views of school are often negative, and their attendance has often been poor. Here, pupils receive an education that is precisely designed to meet their needs. Their aspirations are raised no end. Pupils receive exceptional support and guidance from adults who care deeply about them. This helps them to turn their lives around and get back on track. Pupils said they join the school as a ‘nobody’ but leave as a ‘somebody’, as they rediscover their identity, experiencing daily success.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Adults take time to get to know the needs of pupils and what makes them tick. Pupils learn a highly ambitious curriculum that is carefully matched to their needs. Adults set high expectations for pupils. Because of the expert guidance from adults, pupils meet these expectations, learn extremely well and return to mainstream education prepared for their next stage. They are guided to take responsibility and behave well.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils learn to stay safe and develop essential life skills needed for adulthood through the highly effective personal, social and health education (PSHE) programme. By the time they leave, they are markedly better equipped to succeed in the world. 17 and 18 April 2024
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The curriculum is well developed to support pupils in relatively short-term placements in the school. The school manages the induction of pupils and their subsequent return to mainstream school exceptionally well. No stone is left unturned. This means adults have a detailed understanding of each pupil. This includes those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) as they join. The curriculum builds cumulatively and focuses sharply on ensuring pupils know more and can do more. Leaders have been deliberate and precise in their selection of the important knowledge that pupils need to learn to best help them return to their mainstream school.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
There is a shared expectation amongst all adults that pupils will learn the school’s extremely well-designed curriculum. Despite many pupils having had severely disjointed education experiences in the past, pupils learn and develop extremely well. This is because teachers have expert subject knowledge. They explain new ideas clearly, designing activities that help pupils use and apply their learning. Teachers regularly check to ensure pupils understand. If they do not, teachers skilfully adapt activities, especially for those pupils with SEND. The reading curriculum is carefully designed to expose pupils to a wide range of texts. The school has a well-established phonics programme for those pupils who need support in learning to read.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils’ attendance is high. The overwhelming majority of pupils improve their attendance from the time they start in school. The school keeps a sharp eye on absence and follows up on any concerns swiftly.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Behaviour in and around the school is upbeat. Pupils have positive attitudes to learning, attitudes that many did not have in the past. In lessons, pupils are resilient and keen to learn. They interact well with their friends and listen carefully to, and value, the opinions and views of others.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils’ wider development is well considered. The PSHE curriculum considers the short- term nature of the placements and ensures that important themes, such as online safety, mental health and exploitation, are covered in depth. Pupils benefit greatly from the careers guidance provided. They are well guided to plan their next stages in education, securing college or apprenticeship places, which are well suited to their needs and interests.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Staff are extremely well supported by leaders. They receive regular and relevant training to help keep their practice up to date. They benefit from the sharing of practice more widely across the trust.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Trustees and trust leaders are highly strategic in their thinking and actions. Trustees set the high standard that leaders maintain. They regularly check how the school is performing, using the detailed information they receive from leaders to guide their monitoring activities. All have a clear and accurate picture of the school’s many strengths and aspects that need even further refinement. 17 and 18 April 2024
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Background
When we have judged good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the predecessor school to be good in September 2013.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.3
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 17 and 18 April 2024
p.3
School details
School category Academy alternative provision converter
p.4
School details
Website www.raedwaldtrust.com/westbridge- academy Date of previous inspection 12 March 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.4
Information about this school
The school is part of the Raedwald Trust. The school uses one unregistered alternative provision. Pupils attend the school on a number of different ‘pathways’. The ‘springboard pathway’ is a 19-week programme and places on this pathway are commissioned by local authorities. The school also commissions places directly from local mainstream schools. These pathways are referred to by the school as ‘traded pathways’. These can be one-to-one tuition in the pupils’ own school or small group provision at Westbridge Academy. Whichever pathway pupils are on, all pupils are dual enrolled with their home school.
p.4
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 17 and 18 April 2024
p.4
5
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, the special educational needs coordinator, subject leaders, staff, and trustees. Inspectors also met with a range of leaders from the trust. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around
p.5
5
safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including behaviour logs, attendance records, pupil records, records of trust and governor meetings, school development plans and school self-evaluation documents. Inspectors considered the responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey. There were no responses to Ofsted’s staff or pupil surveys. Inspectors spoke with pupils on both days of the inspection to gather their views.
p.5
Inspection team
Nathan Lowe, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.5
Inspection team
Heather Hann Ofsted Inspector 17 and 18 April 2024
p.5
6
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
6
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
6
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
6
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
6
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion