Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
John Henry Newman Academy
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Mar 2024
- Inspectors verified
Kate Fripp
- Postcode verified
OX4 4LS
- Name on report verified
John Henry Newman Academy
- URN verified
138774
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils who need extra help with their reading receive the support they need to catch up. p.2
- Leaders should make sure that teachers are explicit in the way they present subject materials so that pupils learn and remember what is intended. p.3
- The school should ensure that their ongoing work to develop assessment systems enables teachers to identify and address next steps in learning with increased precision. p.3
- Where attendance needs to improve, this is identified and acted on quickly, providing families with effective support. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,273
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: John Henry Newman Academy Grange Road, Littlemore, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX4 4LS
p.1
Outcome
John Henry Newman Academy continues to be a good school.
p.1
Outcome
The executive headteacher of this school is Katie Screaton. This school is part of the Oxford Diocesan Schools Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Anne Dellar, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Kathy Winrow. The executive headteacher is responsible for this school and one other.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
John Henry Newman Academy is warm and welcoming to all. Pupils enjoy being part of such a diverse and inclusive school community. They absolutely believe in the school’s vision - ‘let your light shine’. This belief permeates through the entire school community and forges the strong relationships within it.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils of all ages live up to the school’s high expectations through their application of the ‘LEARN’ values. Showing respect for others lies at the heart of this. Pupils listen carefully in their lessons and behave consistently well. They work hard and achieve well across much of the curriculum. Pupils know that their kind and caring adults will help them with their learning and if they have any worries.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
There are many opportunities for pupils to develop their character. Pupil leadership roles include house captains, values leaders, buddies and serving on the school council. Pupils understand the democratic systems which lead to their appointments and take their responsibilities seriously. School assemblies regularly include input from pupils who share their experiences. This develops strong understanding about diversity and difference, shaped within a culture of mutual respect. Pupils at this school are happy in the knowledge that they can be themselves.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has designed a curriculum which is relevant and ambitious for all pupils. It reflects the school’s context as well as extending pupils’ horizons beyond the Littlemore area. A culture of effective professional development and useful coaching ensures that 19 and 20 March 2024
p.1
2
teachers know their subjects well. The recently introduced ‘challenge menu’ means that teachers’ questioning is varied and increasingly effective. In most subjects, they use their questioning skills well to check and assess pupils’ learning. However, in a few foundation subjects, this is not as effective as assessment procedures are still being developed.
p.2
2
Leaders express an unwavering ambition for pupils to develop a love for reading. Pupils enjoy visiting the school’s ‘Librarium’, the local community library and Oxford's Story Museum, which they enthuse about. Staff are skilled at teaching pupils how to read. This begins in Nursery, where children have their first encounters with letter names and sounds. They join in enthusiastically with their alphabet song. As pupils move up through the school years, they use their strong phonics knowledge to sound out and read words. As a result, pupils read with increasing fluency. Pupils who need extra help with their reading receive the support they need to catch up.
p.2
2
The learning environment supports pupils’ learning well. Pupils make use of the classroom working walls to recall key vocabulary and learning. In mathematics lessons, pupils find this particularly useful, as well as the resources that help them to illustrate their learning. Across the curriculum, teaching staff model subject-specific conversation and discussions. This means that pupils use familiar ‘sentence stems’ to agree with, challenge or build on their classmates’ observations and thoughts. They articulate their learning well. Teachers design activities that enthuse pupils. At times, while pupils enjoy these activities, they do not help them to learn the intended knowledge well enough.
p.2
2
Additional support is carefully structured to help all pupils succeed, including those who are disadvantaged. This means that all pupils access the full curriculum, with appropriate adaptations. Provision within the ‘Nest’ provides highly personalised support for pupils who have more complex needs. Parents and carers appreciate the information they receive about their children’s learning, through the ‘weekly update’.
p.2
2
Members of the local governing board and trust staff are knowledgeable about the school and work alongside the school’s leaders to develop clear strategic plans. They ask the right questions and always check for impact of any actions. The school’s work to promote pupils’ attendance is robust. Where attendance needs to improve, this is identified and acted on quickly, providing families with effective support. Pupils are proud when they are rewarded with their class ‘attendance parties’.
p.2
2
Pupils benefit from the school’s many meaningful relationships with the local community. They enthuse about their visits to the Jack Peers Outdoor Centre where they learn about nature and the environment. The ‘Into University‘ programme and interactions with local businesses build pupils’ aspirations, giving them valuable insight into their future opportunities. The local Police Community Support Officers lead a group of pupils who are in the ‘mini-police’. These pupils enjoy their opportunities to witness police work in the community, for example at local football matches. One parent sums up the views of many when they say: ‘The school has helped my child to recognise the opportunities that lie ahead for them in the world, where anything is possible.’ 19 and 20 March 2024
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In a few foundation subjects, teaching does not always focus sufficiently on what key knowledge and skills are being taught. This means that sometimes pupils recall the activities undertaken, rather than the intended learning. Leaders should make sure that teachers are explicit in the way they present subject materials so that pupils learn and remember what is intended. In a few foundation subjects, meaningful assessment is not fully established. As a result, checks on what pupils understand are not always used well enough to inform future teaching. The school should ensure that their ongoing work to develop assessment systems enables teachers to identify and address next steps in learning with increased precision.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in June 2018.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school. 19 and 20 March 2024
p.3
4
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 19 and 20 March 2024
p.4
School details
Dates of previous inspection 12 and 13 June 2018
p.5
Information about this school
The school has an above average number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. The school has an above average number of pupils who speak English as an additional language. At this school, the number of pupils who qualify for pupil premium funding is well above national average. The school does not currently use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 19 and 20 March 2024
p.5
6
The inspector met with senior school leaders and representatives from the trust, diocese and the governing body. The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics and art. For each deep dive, the inspector held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspector also discussed the curriculum in some other foundation subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspector evaluated responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey and spoke to pupils to gather their views. The inspector analysed responses to the staff survey and spoke to staff about their
p.6
6
views of the school. The inspector took account of the responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire and the additional free-text responses. The inspector also spoke with parents at the start of the second day of the inspection.
p.6
Inspection team
Kate Fripp, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector 19 and 20 March 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion