Summary
Laurie Anderson (lead), Linda Culling, Marian Feeley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Mar 2024
- Inspectors verified
Laurie Anderson, Linda Culling, Marian Feeley
- Postcode verified
OX2 6PY
- Name on report verified
University of Oxford
- URN verified
70057
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The positive relationships and superb communication across the partnership mean that trainees feel extremely well supported. p.1
- Highly skilled mentors provide exceptional guidance. p.3
- The University of Oxford successfully realises its ambition to ensure that trainees are as well prepared as they can be to become excellent teachers. p.1
- The innovative course design has an exceptionally strong subject focus. p.1
- The provider uses a precisely designed structure that builds trainees’ learning exceptionally well. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance2
“Leaders sensitively adapt it in response to trainees’ and schools’ needs.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 815
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 35, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
University of Oxford Department of Education, 15 Norham Gardens, Oxford OX2 6PY
p.1
Overall effectiveness Outstanding
The quality of education and training Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Outstanding
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
The University of Oxford successfully realises its ambition to ensure that trainees are as well prepared as they can be to become excellent teachers. The innovative course design has an exceptionally strong subject focus. Trainees acquire highly developed subject- specific knowledge and pedagogical understanding to teach complex concepts in an accessible manner to pupils, including those who are disadvantaged.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Trainees are known as ‘interns’. The internship model highlights the shared high expectations and seamless partnership between schools and the provider. The positive relationships and superb communication across the partnership mean that trainees feel extremely well supported. Their well-being is carefully considered. One trainee described the support from the provider as ‘relentless, in a kind and compassionate way’.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
One notable strength of the programme is how trainees learn to be critical consumers of generic and subject-specific research. They make sophisticated use of pertinent research about disadvantaged pupils to inform their practice, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Trainees complete small-scale research projects, guided by their partnership schools, which subtly influence the schools’ practice.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
The course prepares trainees strongly for the realities of teaching, including how to promote positive behaviour and manage their workload. Trainees are supported to become reflective practitioners who build strong networks, including through professional associations. They appreciate how everyone in the partnership is so positive about teaching. One trainee reflected, ‘The passion they have for education is infectious.’
p.1
Information about this ITE provider
◼ The University of Oxford offers the Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) to gain qualified teacher status (QTS) in the secondary phase. Trainees study to teach pupils aged 11 to 18 years. ◼ Trainees study to teach either English, mathematics, science, modern languages, geography, history or religious education. ◼ At the time of the inspection, there were 133 trainees on the course. ◼ The University of Oxford works with 34 schools across four local authorities. ◼ Almost all schools were judged to be good or outstanding by Ofsted at their most recent inspection.
p.2
Information about this inspection
◼ The inspection was conducted by three of His Majesty’s Inspectors. ◼ Inspectors met with a range of leaders, including the course director, deputy course director and director of graduate studies. Inspectors also met with subject leaders, curriculum tutors, subject mentors, headteachers and representatives of the partnership committee. ◼ Inspectors spoke to 38 trainees, 20 mentors, 10 early career teachers and 22 headteachers or professional tutors. The inspection team visited five schools as part of the inspection. ◼ The inspection team carried out focused reviews to help them understand how well trainees are prepared for teaching. The focus review subjects were geography, modern languages, science, English and history.
p.2
better?
Trainees benefit from exemplary training with a laser-sharp subject focus. The course is sequenced coherently and taught collaboratively by expert trainers at the university and in schools. The provider uses a precisely designed structure that builds trainees’ learning exceptionally well. Trainees start by studying research and theory, observing skilled staff in schools and developing their own practice before being expertly supported to reflect on their learning at the university. The programme fully complies with the core content framework and exceeds it in many respects. It builds trainees’ knowledge and skills very well over time, across different contexts, to successfully prepare them for the early years of teaching.
p.2
better?
The provider inspires and equips trainees to teach their subject impressively well. As one trainee reflected, ‘They have put life into my subject.’ Trainees develop excellent subject and subject pedagogical knowledge. Subject-specific research is central to the design of the programme. Trainees acquire a sophisticated understanding of how pupils learn. This includes a focus on common misconceptions in each subject and how to make complex ideas accessible to all pupils. The course sharply focuses on inclusion. Trainees learn to skilfully adapt their teaching to support pupils, including those who are disadvantaged. They work alongside expert colleagues to develop a rich understanding of how to support pupils with SEND and those who speak English as an additional language. The placement week in a special school or setting enriches trainees’ learning substantially.
p.2
better?
The integration of the course curriculum between schools and the university is unique and mutually beneficial. The course is designed jointly by schools and the university. School- based training powerfully complements what trainees learn at the university. Schools are deeply invested in the work of the partnership. Headteachers recognise how trainees positively influence their school with cutting edge practice and research. One headteacher commented how trainees from the programme develop a ‘profound sense of ambition to contribute’.
p.3
better?
Highly skilled mentors provide exceptional guidance. The university ensures that mentor training is robust and ongoing feedback refines mentors’ skills in order to support trainees. The provider quality assures the target setting process rigorously. This ensures that targets are precise and sharply directed at the most important content that trainees need to master. Trainees appreciate this valuable support. One trainee reflected how mentors ‘act as a compass to show the direction to take’. The assessment of trainees is robust and tightly focused on how well they are learning the curriculum. Ambitious check points are built in to support trainees’ development. The university provides extremely effective additional support to any trainee in need of extra help. Trainees benefit from high-quality guidance from subject mentors, professional tutors and curriculum tutors.
p.3
better?
Leaders are passionate in providing the best possible opportunities for trainees. They have a precise understanding of the course strengths, and this is systematically informed by feedback from schools, trainees and subject tutors. However, they are not complacent and strive to continually refine the course. Leaders sensitively adapt it in response to trainees’ and schools’ needs. They are challenged and supported very effectively by the partnership committee. Headteachers appreciate how early career teachers from this provider are professional, ambitious to teach all pupils, and enthusiastic subject specialists.
p.3
compliance criteria?
The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.
p.3
ITE provider details
This inspection was carried out in accordance with the initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook , which sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.
p.4
ITE provider details
Type of ITE provider Higher education institution Phases provided Secondary Dates of previous inspection 18 June and 21 November 2018
p.4
Inspection team
Laurie Anderson, Lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Linda Culling His Majesty’s Inspector Marian Feeley His Majesty’s Inspector
p.4
Annex: Placement schools
Inspectors visited the following schools as part of this inspection:
p.5
Name URN ITE phase
Bartholomew School 137919 Secondary Cheney School 139146 Secondary Didcot Girls’ School 138490 Secondary Fitzharrys School 146392 Secondary Wood Green School 144008 Secondary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Name URN ITE phase
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-
p.6
Name URN ITE phase
government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Name URN ITE phase
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Name URN ITE phase
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion