Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Notre Dame Catholic Girls' School
Summary
Sam Johnson (lead), Anne Hudson, Yvonne Chisholm
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Mar 2024
- Inspectors verified
Anne Hudson, Sam Johnson, Yvonne Chisholm
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SE1 6EX
- Name on report verified
Notre Dame Catholic Girls’ School
- URN verified
149369
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should ensure that all teachers develop their expertise and confidence to ensure that they consistently make the most effective pedagogical choices to support pupils to secure learning well. 19 and 20 March 2024 p.3
- The school’s curricular thinking and implementation in some subjects is very effective. p.2
- The school has high expectations of pupils’ attendance. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 p.1
- The headteacher of this school is Blon Byrne . p.1
- This school is part of The South East London Catholic Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. p.1
- The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), David Garrido, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Alison Thornton. 19 and 20 March 2024 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development3
“They enjoy participating in the range of clubs and activities on offer to all.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,180
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 20%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Notre Dame Catholic Girls’ School 118 St George’s Road, London SE1 6EX
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The headteacher of this school is Blon Byrne . This school is part of The South East London Catholic Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), David Garrido, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Alison Thornton. 19 and 20 March 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is warm and welcoming. Pupils enjoy the friendships that they forge here. Many pupils start school during the school year and many speak English as an additional language. Pupils are patient and kind to their peers, helping each other in lessons. They enjoy participating in the range of clubs and activities on offer to all.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders aspire for pupils to achieve well. Pupils study a broad curriculum. In some subjects, pupils develop an in-depth understanding of what they have learned. However, overall, the quality of education that pupils receive is not strong. This is because teaching does not support all pupils to remember and apply knowledge securely over time in many subjects.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
There have been numerous changes at the school since January 2023. Following a period of turbulence, the school is now more stable. Pupils and staff say that they can see positive improvements. For example, the school has made positive changes to the curriculum. These are not fully embedded. Leaders have made recent changes to the way pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are taught so that they are fully integrated into the life of the school.
p.2
better?
The school wants the best for pupils, irrespective of their personal circumstances or the challenges they may face. Leaders have thought carefully about the knowledge that pupils should learn and the order in which this should be sequenced.
p.2
better?
Typically, teachers have strong subject knowledge. Some staff use their expertise well to design suitable learning activities for pupils. Nevertheless, the school does not always provide clear guidance. This means that teachers do not always ensure that learning activities are effective. In some subjects, pupils are not supported well to connect their prior learning to new subject content. This affects how well they remember what has been taught.
p.2
better?
The school’s curricular thinking and implementation in some subjects is very effective. For example, pupils achieve highly in English, where the published outcomes were strong in 2023. However, the curriculum is not taught consistently well across all subjects. Sometimes teaching does not check if pupils have understood earlier content carefully enough. This hinders how well pupils, including those with SEND, achieve the aims of the curriculum. During lessons, pupils with SEND receive variable levels of support. Although leaders have accurately identified which pupils require additional support, the information provided to staff about what works well for these pupils is sometimes not precise enough to match their needs.
p.2
better?
Until recently, reading has not been sufficiently prioritised. The work to identify and support pupils who struggle to read is in its infancy. The school has now put systems into place to check pupils’ reading knowledge gaps in Years 7 and 8. However, this 19 and 20 March 2024
p.2
3
work is at the early stages of development. This limits how quickly pupils who struggle to read can catch up.
p.3
3
The school has raised its expectations of pupils’ behaviour and introduced new routines to promote a positive learning environment. Typically, the atmosphere around the site is calm and orderly. During lessons, most pupils listen attentively to their teachers and follow instructions. However, there is sometimes disruption to learning. This is because the school’s new behaviour systems are not fully implemented and embedded.
p.3
3
The school’s personal, social and health education curriculum is comprehensive. This includes teaching pupils about the importance of healthy and unhealthy relationships. This includes an age-appropriate relationships education. Pupils benefit from a comprehensive careers programme. This allows pupils to engage with a variety of college providers and employers. This means that pupils can make informed choices about their future. Pupils speak highly of the support they receive to make applications to college and have high aspirations for a bright future.
p.3
3
The school has high expectations of pupils’ attendance. Most pupils attend school regularly and leaders follow up on any pupils whose attendance is a concern.
p.3
3
Most staff are proud to work at the school. They believe that leaders are considerate of their workload and well-being. Trustees and trust leaders understand the strengths and weaknesses of the school. They work in partnership to challenge and support leaders. While many strategies are very new, trust leaders and governors are committed to helping the school to improve further.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Over the course of study, teaching is not enabling pupils to remember long-term content securely. This limits pupils’ ability to deepen their subject-specific understanding and to integrate new knowledge into larger ideas. The school should ensure that pupils’ prior learning is reviewed and embedded in long-term memory to enable pupils to develop a firm foundation for new learning. At times the curriculum is not successfully adapted or developed to meet the needs of all pupils with SEND. This means that some pupils with SEND are not able to develop their knowledge and skills effectively. The school should ensure that all teachers develop their expertise and confidence to ensure that they consistently make the most effective pedagogical choices to support pupils to secure learning well. 19 and 20 March 2024
p.3
4
The school has only recently introduced systems to support pupils who struggle with their reading. This means that these pupils do not catch up quickly. The school should make sure that pupils’ gaps in reading are swiftly identified and that support to help them to read fluently is precisely matched to their needs. New behavioural systems and expectations are not fully embedded and enacted across the school. This means that some pupils disrupt the learning of others. The school should ensure that the new systems and expectations are consistently applied and that all pupils are supported to manage their behaviour appropriately.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 19 and 20 March 2024
p.4
School details
Chair of governing committee Simon Hughes
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
Notre Dame Catholic Girls’ School converted to become an academy in December 2022. When its predecessor school was last inspected by Ofsted in 2012 it was judged to be outstanding. The school is part of the South East London Catholic Academy Trust. The school has a Roman Catholic religious character. The school’s last section 48 inspection took place in May 2019. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 11 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 19 and 20 March 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The lead inspector met representatives from the trust board, including the CEO and the chair of governing committee. Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, geography, art and Spanish. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also considered the curriculum in other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and
p.6
6
considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors talked to groups of pupils, both formally and informally, at break and lunchtimes. Staff views were sought through discussions and the staff survey. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for parents and carers, Ofsted Parent View.
p.6
Inspection team
Sam Johnson, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Yvonne Chisholm Ofsted Inspector 19 and 20 March 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion