Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Larkmead School
Summary
Mary Davies (lead), Andy Johnson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Mar 2024
- Inspectors verified
Andy Johnson, Mary Davies
- Postcode verified
OX14 1RF
- Name on report verified
Larkmead School
- URN verified
143890
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school’s caring ethos ensures it maintains its high expectations, both academically and personally, while also continuing to provide strong support to pupils. p.1
- Sixth-form students are excellent role models. p.2
- The school’s excellent personal development programme covers required content but also responds to issues of broader importance, for example linked to current affairs. p.2
- Staff manage behaviour very effectively, through clear expectations and positive relationships with pupils. p.2
- This is recognised by staff, and they are extremely proud to work at the school. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. p.3
- However, they are not always as clear how to support pupils who have gaps in their learning because of lower rates of attendance, including some disadvantaged pupils. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should continue to embed its culture of high attendance so that the strategies which it has put in place support all pupils to attend regularly and keep up with their work, especially those from more disadvantaged backgrounds. p.3
- The school should continue to support teachers to refine their practice so they can accurately identify what pupils know and can do and adapt their teaching accordingly. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment6
“Most teachers introduce new content well and select activities effectively.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,294
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Larkmead School Faringdon Road, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 1RF
p.1
Outcome
Larkmead School continues to be a good school.
p.1
Outcome
The headteacher is Jonathan Dennett. This school is part of Vale Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Richard Evans, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Beth Taylor.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
This school is a very happy and inclusive place because, as one parent said, pupils ‘are at the heart of what Larkmead does’. Consequently, pupils are polite and respectful with staff and each other. Pupils feel safe and ‘seen’ here. They are very clear that the school does not tolerate bullying or prejudicial behaviour. They know who to go to for help and have confidence that the school will listen and address any concerns. The school’s caring ethos ensures it maintains its high expectations, both academically and personally, while also continuing to provide strong support to pupils.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils benefit from strong personal development. A wide range of extra-curricular activities bring the community together through shared interests and spaces. The school is also aspirational for all pupils academically. Recent curriculum developments are starting to have a positive impact on current pupils’ achievement, most of whom are working to increasingly higher standards and are proud of their work. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, these developments are not yet reflected in published outcomes, particularly for more disadvantaged pupils.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils study an ambitious curriculum in all key stages and can follow subjects through from Year 7 to 13 if they wish. Developments in key stage 3 means that, increasingly, more pupils are taking the suite of GCSE subjects included in the English Baccalaureate. Sixth-form students particularly appreciate the open and inclusive approach to A-level courses options. Most pupils study alongside their peers, with a small number following appropriately adapted programmes. The school provides staff with information about any pupils’ additional needs. Most teachers use this effectively to adapt and target approaches 26 and 27 March 2024
p.1
2
in lessons, particularly for those with SEND and who speak English as an additional language. However, they are not always as clear how to support pupils who have gaps in their learning because of lower rates of attendance, including some disadvantaged pupils.
p.2
2
Staff have identified and sequenced important subject knowledge to help prepare pupils for the next phase of learning. Most teachers introduce new content well and select activities effectively. This allows pupils to embed knowledge gradually. This has remained a focus during recent periods of remote learning. In key stage 4 and in the sixth form, pupils increasingly and effectively draw on their prior learning to help them with more sophisticated tasks. Some teachers do not check effectively enough the depth of pupils’ understanding. Sometimes, especially lower down the school, they do not adjust their approaches to help pupils to apply their learning to increasingly complex tasks precisely and independently.
p.2
2
There is a sharp focus on reading, especially for pupils who are not yet fluent readers. Staff identify where pupils have gaps and target extra support accordingly. These pupils make strong progress. The wider literacy strategy and robust staff training to accompany it are having a positive impact on pupils’ reading across the curriculum.
p.2
2
Staff manage behaviour very effectively, through clear expectations and positive relationships with pupils. Most pupils behave extremely well, both in lessons and during social time. Sixth-form students are excellent role models. However, a small number of pupils find meeting expectations challenging. Consequently, the school has increased and integrated its pastoral and inclusion teams, to further strengthen how it works with pupils and families. This has already had a marked impact on behaviour, especially where pupils have more complex social and behavioural needs. Improvements in attendance are also emerging, but staff acknowledge there is still more to do here, especially for disadvantaged pupils.
p.2
2
The school’s excellent personal development programme covers required content but also responds to issues of broader importance, for example linked to current affairs. Pupils in all years have an age-appropriate understanding of healthy relationships and how to stay safe, including online. They learn about equality and are proud of their welcoming school community. Careers provision is impressive. Pupils benefit from regular careers and employability events and talks, often involving their wide range of partners from the world of work, education and training. Consequently, pupils are very well prepared for their next steps. As with all areas of the school’s work, staff ensure that all personal development and careers activities are fully inclusive.
p.2
2
The trust provides strong support and challenge for the school, not least linked to safeguarding. Staff value the access they have to high-quality and collaborative professional development. The school and trust are mindful of colleagues’ workload and well-being in their decision-making. This is recognised by staff, and they are extremely proud to work at the school.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 26 and 27 March 2024
p.2
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some teachers do not systematically check all pupils’ accuracy and depth of understanding to a high enough level. Consequently, some pupils cannot draw on the full range of what they have learned and apply it fluently, especially in key stage 3. The school should continue to support teachers to refine their practice so they can accurately identify what pupils know and can do and adapt their teaching accordingly. Some pupils’ attendance is not yet high enough. This means that these pupils do not benefit from all that the school has to offer and that they do not achieve as well as they could. The school should continue to embed its culture of high attendance so that the strategies which it has put in place support all pupils to attend regularly and keep up with their work, especially those from more disadvantaged backgrounds.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in February 2015.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.3
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and 26 and 27 March 2024
p.3
4
protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 26 and 27 March 2024
p.4
form
Dates of previous inspection 15 January 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of Vale Academy Trust. The school currently uses four registered alternative providers and eleven unregistered providers. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 26 and 27 March 2024
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held meetings with senior leaders of the school and trust leaders. The lead inspector held meetings with the chair of the board of trustees, trustees and governors. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, history and design and technology. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered
p.6
Information about this inspection
the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors considered a range of documentation provided by the school. This included the school’s self-evaluation, published information about pupils’ performance and minutes of trustees’ and governors’ meetings. Inspectors spoke to a wide range of pupils and observed their behaviour in lessons and at social times. Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted Parent View questionnaire, including free- text responses. They also took account of the responses to the staff and pupil surveys and gathered the views of parents, staff and pupils throughout the inspection.
p.6
Inspection team
Mary Davies, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Andy Johnson Ofsted Inspector 26 and 27 March 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion