Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Newbridge Learning Community

Inspected 27 Mar 2024 · published 14 May 2024 · URN 135199

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Julie Bather (lead), Michelle Beard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Julie Bather, Michelle Beard

  • Postcode verified

    WN2 3TL

  • Name on report verified

    Newbridge Learning Community

  • URN verified

    135199

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 31% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyhighly effectivehigh expectationsproudambitiousstrongwell designedfeel safe
Criticismconcernsseriousnot alwaysgapsunclearnot clearlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1180w+35
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,184
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Newbridge Learning Community Moss Lane, Platt Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire WN2 3TL

p.1

Outcome

Newbridge Learning Community continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe and well cared for in this school. They enjoy the small class sizes and get the help that they need from the adults around them. The school has high expectations for pupils and this supports pupils to achieve well. They are happy and enjoy the practical lessons, including cookery, motorcycle mechanics and art and design. Pupils are proud of their achievements. Displays around the school are full of pupils’ creative and written work. A league trophy, recently won by the school football team, takes pride of place.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Over time, pupils learn to manage their emotions and behaviour. Staff help them to find their own unique strategies, which pupils use in school to reduce any anxiety or negative emotions. Pupils trust the adults in school. They feel listened to and know that adults will intervene swiftly if any pupils fall out. The school promotes and celebrates positive behaviour. Pupils earn points, for example, when they show respect, kindness or self- discipline. They value these points and use them towards end of term trips or to buy a non-uniform day.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has carefully considered the special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) of the pupils in school when designing the curriculum. The curriculum is broad and ambitious and allows pupils to study a wide range of subjects. The school has also ensured that the curriculum allows pupils, who may have significant gaps in their knowledge, to catch up quickly. This ensures that pupils achieve nationally recognised qualifications, including GCSEs and vocational awards.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers know which type of activities will engage pupils’ curiosity and will prompt pupils to ask appropriate questions. This is because the school clearly identifies pupils’ SEND and understands how to support individual pupils to learn well. Staff provide pupils with frequent and varied opportunities to explain their thinking. This helps pupils to build their knowledge and gain in confidence in each subject. In most subjects, before moving pupils on in their learning, teachers use a range of assessment strategies to check what pupils 26 and 27 March 2024

p.1

2

have remembered and understood. The curriculums in these subjects are well thought out and allow pupils to build on what they already know.

p.2

2

However, in a small number of subjects, the curriculum is not as well developed. It is not always clear to staff what pupils need to know. In addition, staff have not received relevant support and training. This means that they are unclear about the strategies and resources that they should use to help pupils to learn well. At times, this causes some pupils to become distracted from their learning and they do not learn as well as they could.

p.2

2

There is a strong culture of reading in this school. Pupils read widely and often. The school has a vast range of exciting and age-appropriate books that pupils enjoy reading. The books can be read by pupils who are at the early stages of reading as well as pupils who are fluent readers. The school identifies pupils who may need additional support with their reading. There is a range of in-class and one-to-one support in place to help these pupils with their reading. Pupils gain the knowledge and skills that they need to become confident, fluent readers.

p.2

2

Regular attendance is a high priority for the school. It works closely with parents and carers, the local authority and a range of additional organisations to overcome any barriers to attendance. The school tries different strategies and will not give up until they see improvements. This practice has resulted in some significant improvements to pupils’ attendance over time.

p.2

2

The school’s work to support pupils’ personal development is highly effective. It prepares pupils well for their next stage in education and adulthood. There is a well-established programme of lessons and activities, which allow pupils to learn about themselves, relationships, careers and life in modern Britain. A recent activity week focused on ‘living in the wider world’ and this had been carefully thought through. Some pupils met community first responders and learned some first aid. Older pupils had mock interviews and received feedback from local business owners. Other pupils enjoyed workshops around keeping themselves safe in the community.

p.2

2

The vast majority of staff are proud to work in this school. They can talk to leaders if they have any concerns about their workload or well-being. They feel that leaders will listen and give them additional time to complete tasks when they need it.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In a small number of subjects, the curriculum does not make clear what pupils need to learn. Consequently, pupils do not build their learning on what they already know. The 26 and 27 March 2024

p.2

3

school should ensure that all subjects are well designed so that pupils can acquire the intended knowledge and skills that they need.  In some subjects, staff have not received the training and support that they need to engage pupils in their learning. Consequently, at times, pupils disengage from their learning and do not learn as well as they could. The school should ensure that the learning activities provided for pupils enable them to achieve well in all subjects.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in November 2012.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 26 and 27 March 2024

p.3

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

School details

Chair of governing body Michael John Inman

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 9 November 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 The school uses five unregistered alternative providers.  All pupils have an education, health and care plan. The school caters for pupils with social, emotional and mental health needs.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, senior leaders, subject leaders and members of the governing body, including the chair of the governing body. An inspector also spoke 26 and 27 March 2024

p.4

5

with a representative of the local authority and a representative of the local school improvement board.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English and reading, mathematics and humanities (history and geography). For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including policies and analyses of pupils’ behaviour and attendance.  Inspectors spoke to some pupils and staff about the school. They also observed pupils

p.5

5

during lunch and breaktimes.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff. They also considered the views of parents expressed through Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses. An inspector also spoke with a number of parents. There were no responses to the pupil survey to consider.

p.5

Inspection team

Julie Bather, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Michelle Beard Ofsted Inspector 26 and 27 March 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion