Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 May 2024

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Simon Conway

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Simon Conway

  • Postcode verified

    UB4 8JP

  • Name on report verified

    Hewens College This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 18 April

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−2Mixedmore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivelovepositivelysecureswiftlyclearlyclear
Criticismrequires improvementweakernot ambitiousdisruptionlownot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings509w+5
  • What needs to improve260w−25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
768
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%What needs to improve 34%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Marlene Littlefair Principal Hewens College Hewens Road Hayes Middlesex UB4 8JP

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Hewens College

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 18 April 2024, on behalf of His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Hewens College

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school's overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school's progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school's previous graded inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Hewens College

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the trust and other members of the trust the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I met with curriculum leaders for mathematics, history, English and music and visited a number of lessons in these subjects. I also met with leaders with responsibilities for reading, careers, attendance, and safeguarding. I met a range of pupils, including those with leadership responsibilities in the school. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to become good. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

 Ensure the strategies teachers use to check pupils’ understanding and address misconceptions are routinely applied to enable the impact of the curriculum to be secure for all pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, you have developed a number of middle leaders which has added further leadership capacity to support the pastoral team and to support reading in the school. As you were appointed as principal of the school only a number of weeks before the previous inspection, you have now had the time to begin implementing your vision for school improvement.

p.2

Main findings

At the time of the last inspection, the curriculum at key stage 3 was not broad and ambitious. In several subjects, leaders had not identified the key knowledge they expected pupils to learn. Since then, you have acted swiftly to ensure that the curriculum in all subjects focuses more clearly on the key knowledge that pupils must learn. You have also increased the number of subjects that pupils study in Year 9 to include all the subjects of the national curriculum. This has ensured that pupils all study a broad curriculum throughout key stage 3. During the previous inspection, weaker readers did not routinely receive the help they needed to read with accuracy. The school has invested in a programme to help to identify, track and support these pupils. Plans are in place to provide bespoke support for pupils to help develop their reading fluency and confidence in decoding. A number of strategies have been implemented to develop a wider love of

p.2

Main findings

reading in the school. This includes the current building of a new library.

p.2

Main findings

You, and your leaders, have focused on the school’s key priorities for improvement. You have made changes systematically and carefully to ensure that these become embedded in the culture of the school. You have also been careful to manage the workload and well- being of staff in the school during this process of change. Staff have embraced the positive changes in the school and feel part of the process. The trust has provided support and developmental opportunities to help facilitate the school improvement process.

p.2

Main findings

One of your key areas of improvement has been developing the culture of the school. During the previous inspection low level disruption was sometimes tolerated and at times unsettled learning. Through the development of the ‘Hewens spirit’, you have developed a positive culture. This has helped all members of the community to understand the school’s expectations. No low-level disruption was observed during this visit and pupils spoke positively about behaviour in lessons and around the school site.

p.2

Main findings

You have developed a comprehensive careers programme in the school. During the last inspection it was found that older pupils did not have consistent access to careers advice. There is now a clear programme that provides all pupils with comprehensive advice and guidance. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the CEO of the Rosedale Hewens Academy Trust, the Department for Education's regional director and the director of children's services for Hillingdon. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion