Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Mary's Catholic Primary School
Summary
David Spruce (lead), Liz Davidson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
31 Jan 2024
- Inspectors verified
David Spruce, Liz Davidson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
L23 4UA
- Name on report verified
St Mary’s Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
104927
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In a few subjects, the school has not sufficiently considered how curriculum content should be taught to pupils in mixed-aged classes. p.4
- However, the school still has some work to do to clarify what children should learn in the early years. p.2
- However, the school still needs to give some further thought to how the delivery of some subject curriculums 30 and 31 January 2024 p.2
- should be adapted to cater for pupils in mixed-age classes. p.3
- The school has ensured that most subject curriculums clearly identify the crucial knowledge that pupils need to know. p.2
- The school should develop the early years curriculum further so that staff are clear on the intended knowledge that children should acquire and at what point. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment4
“Pupils said that their teachers are caring.” p.2Leadership & governance3
“Staff appreciate the efforts of leaders to consider their workload.” p.3Personal development3
“The school caters particularly well for pupils’ personal development.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,276
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Mary’s Catholic Primary School Back Lane, Crosby, Liverpool, Merseyside L23 4UA
p.1
Inspection dates: 30 and 31 January 2024
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 30 and 31 January 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ individual personalities are allowed to shine at this small, rural school. They are confident, enjoy coming to school and are very happy. Pupils said that their teachers are caring. There are positive relationships between pupils and staff.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils said that they appreciate being in a small school like this. They feel that it helps them to form closer bonds with other pupils. Fall outs are extremely rare. Pupils are sensible and feel safe.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Since the last inspection, the school has raised its expectations for what pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), can achieve. Pupils are achieving particularly well in their learning of phonics. However, the school still has some work to do to clarify what children should learn in the early years.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils take great pride in the variety of meaningful responsibilities that they can undertake. For example, the woodland warriors maintain a nearby wooded area and put food out for the birds.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have access to wide a range of extra-curricular opportunities that include art, drama and sports clubs. These are well attended. Pupils also take part in local competitions. They appreciate the additional curriculum trips and residential visits that the school organises for them. Pupils take part in many charitable activities such as foodbank collections and coffee mornings.
p.2
better?
Since the previous inspection, the school has experienced further instability in staffing. Nonetheless, it managed this period well. During this time, the school was still able to prioritise improvements to the delivery of its phonics programme, which was an issue identified during the last inspection. The school’s effective actions have led to a high proportion of pupils meeting the most recent Year 1 phonics screening check.
p.2
better?
Staffing has now stabilised. Permanent staff have returned from periods of absence. The school has now driven forward most other necessary curriculum changes at pace. Many subject curriculums have either been redesigned or adopted recently. The school has ensured that most subject curriculums clearly identify the crucial knowledge that pupils need to know. This is starting to help teachers to deliver subject content in a logical order. It is also helping teachers to carry out more effective checks on what pupils have learned.
p.2
better?
The curriculum changes – while still relatively new – are already having a notable impact on what pupils know and remember over time. However, the school still needs to give some further thought to how the delivery of some subject curriculums 30 and 31 January 2024
p.2
3
should be adapted to cater for pupils in mixed-age classes. This is so that pupils do not unnecessarily repeat learning that they have already secured.
p.3
3
The school has taken some steps to develop the early years curriculum since the last inspection. It has now broadly outlined the expectations for children’s learning each term. However, the school still has more to do in this area. Other than in phonics and mathematics, the school is not clear about the precise knowledge that it expects children to learn. This leads to too much variability in what children are taught. As a result, children are not as well prepared for learning in key stage 1 as they could be.
p.3
3
The school fosters a genuine love of reading and makes it a high priority. Books are given pride of place around the building. Pupils develop their knowledge of authors and stories. They enjoy reading books that help them to learn more about the topics that they are studying, such as those about the Ancient Egyptians and the Mayans.
p.3
3
Children learn phonics through the school’s chosen programme as soon as they start in the Reception Year. Staff receive appropriate training and expertise in this programme. They teach phonics consistently well. The school makes sure that the books that pupils read are suited to the sounds that pupils know. The school provides excellent, highly focused levels of additional support to pupils who need extra help with learning to read. This means that the vast majority of pupils quickly become fluent, confident readers.
p.3
3
The school has started to develop new approaches to evaluate how well staff are implementing curriculum changes. However, in a few subjects, these approaches need further refinement. This is so that the school can intervene more swiftly to address some deficiencies in how well some subject content is currently being delivered.
p.3
3
The school quickly identifies pupils who may have additional needs. It ensures that pupils with SEND receive effective support in their learning. These pupils achieve well.
p.3
3
The school caters particularly well for pupils’ personal development. Pupils develop a strong understanding of how to look after their own mental well-being. They know how to develop safe, positive relationships with others. They know how to stay safe online. Pupils show tolerance and respect for people’s different backgrounds. They learn about fundamental British values. Older pupils have a secure knowledge of democracy and its foundations in ancient civilisations. Pupils at this school are prepared well for life in modern Britain.
p.3
3
The school encourages positive attitudes to school attendance. Pupils enjoy coming to school and do so regularly. Pupils show an equally positive attitude to their learning. In most classes, most pupils engage well. They follow classroom routines and play nicely together during social times.
p.3
3
Staff appreciate the efforts of leaders to consider their workload. They value that leaders consult them on any proposed changes to policies and procedures. 30 and 31 January 2024
p.3
4
Governors provide appropriate levels of challenge. They carry out their statutory duties effectively.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school has not precisely identified what children will learn in many parts of the early years curriculum. This means that children do not build the foundations for future knowledge coherently. The school should develop the early years curriculum further so that staff are clear on the intended knowledge that children should acquire and at what point. In some subjects, the school is in the early stages of establishing systems to evaluate the delivery and impact of new subject curriculums on what pupils know. This means that some variability in how the school curriculum is taught is not addressed as quickly as it could be. The school should develop more robust approaches to evaluating the delivery of some curriculums and how well these are helping pupils to build their knowledge over time. In a few subjects, the school has not sufficiently considered how curriculum content should be taught to pupils in mixed-aged classes. On occasion, this
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
means that some pupils repeat learning that is already secure. The school should provide further curriculum guidance so that teachers can deliver new content more effectively to pupils of different ages in the same class.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with SEND; pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after 30 and 31 January 2024
p.4
5
children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 30 and 31 January 2024
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection 29 September 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
A new chair of the governing body has been appointed since the last inspection. Owing to unavoidable staff absence, most classes have been taught by temporary staff for much of the time between this and the previous inspection. Substantive staff have returned this academic year. Leaders do not make use of alternative provision. The school is a voluntary-aided Catholic primary school. The most recent section 48 inspection of the school’s religious character took place in November 2018.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 30 and 31 January 2024
p.6
7
This was the second routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors conducted deep dives in these subjects: early reading, history and mathematics. They met with subject leaders and teachers. They visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work and talked with groups of pupils about their learning. The lead inspector observed pupils read to a familiar adult. Inspectors also considered the curriculum, spoke with pupils about their learning and evaluated their work in some other subjects. The lead inspector spoke with a group of governors. Inspectors also talked to staff about their workload and well-being. The lead inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority and the diocese. Inspectors met with the leaders who are responsible for attendance, behaviour
p.7
7
and pupils’ personal development. Inspectors spoke with pupils about their wider experience of school. Inspectors looked at a range of policies and documents related to pupils’ welfare and education. They observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and pupils. Inspectors met with parents at the start of the school day and took account of the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses.
p.7
Inspection team
David Spruce, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Liz Davidson Ofsted Inspector 30 and 31 January 2024
p.7
8
and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion