Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Leesland Church of England Controlled Junior School
Summary
Sue Keeling (lead), Carla Laney, Diane Charman
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Mar 2024
- Inspectors verified
Carla Laney, Diane Charman, Sue Keeling
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
PO12 3QF
- Name on report verified
Leesland Church of England Controlled Junior School
- URN verified
116334
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Strong relationships exist between all members of the school community, underpinned by the school values of love, grace and respect. p.2
- The school is ambitious for all pupils to be confident and fluent readers. p.3
- All pupils enjoy opportunities to develop leadership skills and make a positive contribution to their school community. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means that while pupils know what they are doing, they do not understand the important knowledge they need to remember and therefore they do not always learn as well as they could. 19 and 20 March 2024 p.2
- The school should continue to strengthen the actions and support provided for pupils and their families to continue to reduce absence. p.3
- However, there are a few pupils, including some pupils with SEND, who do not attend school as much as they should. p.3
- The school should improve teachers’ knowledge and expertise to help pupils to achieve well across the curriculum. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment6
“Where this is strongest, teachers explain information clearly and confidently.” p.2Progress & outcomes5
“As a result, pupils learn effectively and achieve well.” p.2Behaviour2
“Generally, pupils behave well.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 956
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Leesland Church of England Controlled Junior School Gordon Road, Gosport, Hampshire PO12 3QF
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good 19 and 20 March 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are well cared for at this school. Strong relationships exist between all members of the school community, underpinned by the school values of love, grace and respect. Adults consistently treat pupils with kindness and respect. Pupils value this and feel safe in school. Strong support systems are in place. Pupils access these confidently when they need help with any worries or concerns.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school strives for all pupils to achieve their very best and be successful. Pupils know that achieving well requires hard work and resilience. Generally, they rise to this challenge, maintaining a clear focus on their learning in lessons. As a result, pupils learn effectively and achieve well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ learning is enhanced through various visits and visitors. A journey along a local river cements pupils’ understanding of different river features, and visits to museums and art galleries enrich pupils’ experience of the world beyond the classroom. Furthermore, through working with local community groups, pupils learn about diversity and the importance of saving money and budgeting.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
All pupils enjoy opportunities to develop leadership skills and make a positive contribution to their school community. They are proud of the different jobs they do, such as ‘Leesland Leaders’, ‘Sports Crew’ and a wide variety of class monitor roles.
p.2
better?
The school has designed a rich curriculum that enables pupils to make important connections between the topics they learn with confidence. This helps pupils remember and use knowledge and skills well. For example, when learning about crime and punishment in history, pupils start by reviewing previously learned information about life more generally in Roman Britain and Saxon England. Furthermore, when writing, older pupils apply previously learned knowledge to write skilfully, with highly accurate grammar, punctuation and spelling.
p.2
better?
Generally, teaching helps pupils to learn well. Where this is strongest, teachers explain information clearly and confidently. They break down learning into manageable steps, which builds pupils’ knowledge in a sensible order. For example, in art and design, pupils learn about standard proportions of the human body prior to introducing the concept of distortion into their work. In all subjects, the school ensures that the additional help needed by pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is identified accurately. This means that pupils with SEND are supported effectively to access the curriculum and achieve well.
p.2
better?
However, there are some inconsistencies in teaching. Sometimes, teachers give pupils work that does not link clearly to what they are meant to be learning. This means that while pupils know what they are doing, they do not understand the important knowledge they need to remember and therefore they do not always learn as well as they could. 19 and 20 March 2024
p.2
3
The school is ambitious for all pupils to be confident and fluent readers. A variety of carefully considered strategies encourage pupils to love reading, including gifting several books to pupils during their time at the school. Pupils at the early stages of reading learn phonics using a well-structured programme. Well-trained staff deliver the programme well and pupils catch up quickly. Most pupils now read with confidence and fluency appropriate to their age.
p.3
3
Generally, pupils behave well. They are polite and well-mannered to adults. Most pupils attend school regularly. However, there are a few pupils, including some pupils with SEND, who do not attend school as much as they should. While the school is taking steps to improve this, these pupils’ attendance is not improving. This is because some of the strategies being used are still early in their implementation.
p.3
3
The school works hard to support pupils’ personal development. Pupils understand the importance of tolerance, that voting is part of the democratic system and that laws exist to keep communities safe. Pupils also learn about healthy relationships and have an age-appropriate understanding of how to stay safe online. This gives pupils confidence in reporting online behaviours that they know to be wrong.
p.3
3
All adults work well together to provide a high-quality education for all pupils. Staff appreciate the training they receive to help ensure pupils learn well.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Teachers’ knowledge of how to ensure pupils know and remember more over time is not as strong as it could be. This means that they do not always use the most effective strategies to enable pupils to achieve as well as they could. The school should improve teachers’ knowledge and expertise to help pupils to achieve well across the curriculum. Too many pupils do not attend school regularly enough. High levels of absence mean these pupils develop gaps in their understanding and can fall behind their peers. The school should continue to strengthen the actions and support provided for pupils and their families to continue to reduce absence.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 19 and 20 March 2024
p.3
4
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 19 and 20 March 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Rebecca Strong (Acting chair of governing body) Headteacher Claire Hope (Executive headteacher)
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 10 and 11 October 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is federated with Leesland Church of England Controlled Infant School, under one governing body and one executive headteacher. This is a Church of England voluntary-controlled junior school within the Diocese of Portsmouth. Its most recent section 48 Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools took place in June 2016. The school does not currently use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 19 and 20 March 2024
p.5
6
During the inspection, the inspectors met with the executive headteacher, the head of school and senior leaders. The lead inspector also met with members of the governing body, including the chair of governors, a representative from the local authority and a representative from the Anglican Diocese of Portsmouth. The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, geography, and art and design. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive
p.6
6
culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The views of parents and carers were considered through their responses to Ofsted Parent View. The views of pupils and staff were gathered through surveys, interviews and discussions conducted throughout the inspection. Inspectors reviewed a range of the school’s documents, including self-evaluation reports, minutes of governing body meetings and behaviour incident logs.
p.6
Inspection team
Sue Keeling, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Carla Laney Ofsted Inspector 19 and 20 March 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion