Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Longtown Community Primary School

Inspected 11 Apr 2024 · published 13 May 2024 · URN 116705

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Sims (lead), John Parr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Apr 2024

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Parr, Mark Sims

  • Postcode verified

    HR2 0LE

  • Name on report verified

    Longtown Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    116705

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesuccessfullyconsistentlyambitiousloveenjoystrengthrespectfulenthusiastic
Criticismseriousnot successfulfalls behindconcernsstrugglegapspersistently absentlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1141w+19
  • Safeguarding9w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,145
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
0
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Longtown Community Primary School Longtown, Hereford, Herefordshire HR2 0LE

p.1

Outcome

Longtown Community Primary School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils love coming to school regularly. They enjoy their subjects and, in some cases, wish they had more time to study them. Reading is at the heart of the curriculum. Texts are carefully selected to match with pupils’ studies in other subjects, such as science and geography. They also draw on the farming background of many pupils.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school wants all pupils to do well. The mantra is, ‘Everyone strives to be their very best’. This is particularly achieved in phonics, where all pupils in Year 1 achieve well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The behaviour and attitudes of pupils are a significant strength. Pupils are kind and respectful to each other, and enthusiastic in their learning. They ask enquiring questions from an early age. Pupils feel safe in school and know there is always someone to talk to.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school makes full use of its Olchon Valley environment in the shadow of the Black Mountains. This includes making use of the local outdoor centre. The school provides pupils with wider experiences that contrast with its rural location. To experience more diverse settings, pupils travel to the city of Cardiff, where they visit a mosque and a synagogue.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has put in place an ambitious curriculum that seeks to give pupils experiences of the local community and the world beyond. The world map on display in the school hall is peppered with examples of curriculum links to different countries, including Bangladesh and Nepal.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

For each subject, the school has identified the key knowledge, skills and vocabulary it wants pupils to learn. It has thought carefully about how to deliver a two-year cycle and, in some instances, a three-year cycle to take account of mixed-age classes. Curriculum content is successfully sequenced to recap pupils’ learning and revisit themes in greater depth. This can be seen, for example, in studies of the United Kingdom in geography. This 11 April 2024

p.1

2

work builds on children’s experiences in the early years. In Reception, children create maps of their journey to Longtown Castle. They construct a representation of the Black Mountains in the sand tray, containing a water channel for the River Wye. All the time they use correct geographical vocabulary.

p.2

2

Children get off to a rapid start learning to read through the phonics programme when they join Reception. The programme is delivered consistently well. For the occasional pupil who falls behind, or finds reading difficult, the school quickly intervenes with additional support to ensure they keep up. This means that all pupils gain the knowledge and skills to read confidently and fluently.

p.2

2

Enquiry work and problem-solving are at the heart of the science curriculum, including in the early years where children explore the growth from tadpole to frog and from seed to bean. Science is sequenced well so that pupils’ knowledge builds over time. Teachers make intentional links between subjects, which help deepen pupils’ understanding. For instance, they overlap learning about plant growth in science with a geography topic on crops in Kenya.

p.2

2

The curriculum is adapted well to take account of the needs of the small number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Teachers make many and varied checks on how pupils are doing. Assessment tasks are adapted well to support pupils who may struggle with writing. This enables teachers to quickly identify any gaps or misconceptions to be addressed. A few curriculum subjects are not as well embedded and pupils’ learning is less successful. The school’s checks on how well pupils are getting on in these subjects are less well developed.

p.2

2

The school has worked successfully to improve the rate of pupils’ attendance. Consequently, very few pupils are persistently absent. Overall attendance compares favourably with the national picture. The school has strengthened its relationships with parents and carers to achieve this. A high number of parents responded to Ofsted’s survey. Almost all said they would recommend the school to another parent.

p.2

2

Pupils have numerous opportunities for activities to enhance their personal development, including archery, rock climbing, surfing, a radio club and charity events. They can also take on roles, such as becoming a prefect, sports leader, librarian or a member of the environmental committee.

p.2

2

Leaders are highly mindful of reducing staff’s workload, especially in a very small school where all staff take on additional roles. Staff are highly appreciative of this. Governors in turn prioritise the well-being of the headteacher, recognising the additional demands of leading a small school. They bring significant expertise and experience to their role and also help out as volunteers for clubs or hearing pupils read.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 11 April 2024

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 A few foundation subjects are not as well embedded as others. In addition, the school’s checks on the implementation of these subjects are less well developed. As a result, the impact on pupils’ learning is not as successful as it could be. The school should ensure that the curriculum for all subjects is implemented effectively so that pupils achieve consistently well across all subjects.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in June 2014.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 11 April 2024

p.3

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

School details

Headteacher Jane Barnes (acting head of school)

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 26 September 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 The previous head of school left in December 2023. The current acting head of school has been in post since January 2023. The post is part time, three days a week.  The chair of the governing body was appointed in September 2023.  There are four classes in the school. Three of these are mixed-age classes for pupils from Years 1 to 6.  The school does not make use of alternative provision.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the executive headteacher, the acting head of school, senior teachers and other staff. 11 April 2024

p.4

5

 Inspectors spoke to groups of pupils.  An inspector met two members of the governing body, including the chair.  An inspector spoke to a representative from the local authority by telephone.  Inspectors took account of responses to the Ofsted Parent View free-text service, the online questionnaire and the staff survey. There were no responses to the pupil survey.  Inspectors considered information on pupils’ behaviour, attendance and personal development.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, geography and science. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also listened to pupils read and discussed the curriculum in some other subjects, including in the early years foundation stage.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single

p.5

5

central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.5

5

Mark Sims, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.5

5

John Parr Ofsted Inspector 11 April 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion