Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Bevington Primary School
Summary
Karim Ismail (lead), Sabrina Edwards, Sarah Saunders
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 Feb 2024
- Inspectors verified
Karim Ismail, Sabrina Edwards, Sarah Saunders
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
W10 5TW
- Name on report verified
Bevington Primary School
- URN verified
100479
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- At times they benefit from high-quality interaction with caring adults. p.2
- Systems should be embedded effectively and staff supported to secure positive behaviour from pupils across the school. p.4
- The school should strengthen its governance arrangements to ensure that the necessary expertise, consistent systems and high-quality strategic oversight are in place to support and challenge leaders to improve the school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is because there is inconsistent staffing and a lack of capacity to prioritise these pupils’ needs. p.3
- This means lessons are disrupted, pupils do not follow positive routines, and that incidents of poor behaviour occur frequently. p.4
- They are sometimes physical with each other and use poor language. p.2
- Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) sometimes have poor experiences in the classroom. p.2
- The number of suspensions is high and pupils with SEND are disproportionately affected due to a lack of alternative support for them. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 11 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. p.1
- This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time. p.1
- From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. p.1
- Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 28 and 29 February 2024 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment6
“They are confident that teachers would address bullying correctly.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,469
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 21%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Bevington Primary School Bevington Road, London W10 5TW
p.1
Inspection dates: 28 and 29 February 2024
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 11 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 28 and 29 February 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Since the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, the school has been through a period of difficult change. Pupils at this school are not receiving a high- quality education across their subjects. The number of staff leaving the school has been high and this has disrupted pupils’ learning. Some improvements are emerging in mathematics and English. In other subjects, the curriculum is not being delivered effectively.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say that they feel safe and that bullying is not common. They are confident that teachers would address bullying correctly. Pupils say that all would be welcome in the school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils are respectful towards staff and work hard during lessons. Some disrupt learning or choose not to take part in the set activities. Pupils’ behaviour when moving around the school and in the playground is not reliably positive. They are sometimes physical with each other and use poor language.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations of what pupils can learn to do, but these expectations are not yet realised. Pupils do not achieve as well as they should across the range of subjects. Many do not learn to read quickly enough. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) sometimes have poor experiences in the classroom.
p.2
better?
An interim leadership team was put in place in September 2022 and a new curriculum is now ready across subjects. This shows ambitious expectations of what pupils should know, starting from Nursery. The new curriculum outlines a broad range of subjects with depth matching that of the national curriculum.
p.2
better?
Pupils are not consistently receiving this curriculum in the classroom. The school has not ensured that pupils consistently benefit from high-quality teaching. In Years 3 to 6 in particular, pupils do not have regular lessons in the full range of subjects. This leads to a narrow and unbalanced curriculum that does not build up knowledge and skills across all subjects over time. Children in the early years have a varied experience. At times they benefit from high-quality interaction with caring adults. However, these interactions are not frequent enough and some children can remain disengaged for periods of time.
p.2
better?
Many pupils achieve well in mathematics and English by the time they reach the end of Year 6. However, there is not a consistent experience across subjects, and especially for pupils with SEND. The ambition for what pupils with SEND can achieve is not high. Some benefit from being integrated into lessons. However, some pupils with complex needs are not receiving a high-quality education. They are given simple work to complete, or allowed to opt out of work in classrooms without 28 and 29 February 2024
p.2
3
receiving support. On occasion, they receive extra sessions from external agencies. This is not well organised and pupils miss access to important learning at times.
p.3
3
Most staff involved in the delivery of early reading have been well trained and know how to deliver the programme effectively. Weaker readers, however, are not learning to read quickly. The additional time committed to them is infrequent and irregular. This is because there is inconsistent staffing and a lack of capacity to prioritise these pupils’ needs. Some pupils with the highest levels of need do not benefit from the expertise of staff and are allowed to opt out of learning to read.
p.3
3
The school has been successful in ensuring that pupils attend the school regularly. Rates of attendance and punctuality are high and leaders work effectively with parents and carers to promote good attendance.
p.3
3
The school has established a new behaviour policy, but it is not yet applied consistently and fairly. The school does not support and oversee this area effectively. Staff, including early career teachers (ECTs), are not confident in the management of pupils’ behaviour. Some pupils demonstrate physically challenging behaviour, including those in the early years, and the school is not able to support these pupils well. The number of suspensions at the school is high. Pupils who are vulnerable are more likely to be suspended than others and some do not reintegrate well back into school. As a result, a small number of pupils receive multiple suspensions.
p.3
3
The school’s work to support pupils’ wider development is variable. Pupils do not receive regular lessons to develop their awareness of protected characteristics and positive relationships. This aspect of learning is not prioritised and quality teaching does not occur. Pupils do respect those who are different from themselves, however. But overall, the school does not prepare pupils well for the next stage of their education.
p.3
3
Most staff report that their well-being and workload are taken into consideration. The proportion of ECTs in the school is high, and at times this means they do not have the opportunity to learn from more experienced teachers.
p.3
3
The oversight and governance of the school is inconsistent. Over time, those responsible have not challenged leaders sufficiently or held them to account in the interest of pupils.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some pupils are not helped to catch up in their reading quickly enough, including pupils with SEND. This means that they are unable to fully access the curriculum. 28 and 29 February 2024
p.3
4
The school should ensure that early reading is prioritised and that the weakest readers receive frequent and consistent support so they catch up quickly. Pupils are not consistently receiving a broad and balanced curriculum. This is because the new curriculum is not embedded and some subjects are infrequently taught, particularly at key stage 2. Pupils are not building up knowledge in a range of subjects, and are not prepared for their next stage of learning. The school should strengthen its systems for checking that the curriculum is delivered as intended. Pupils with SEND are not receiving an ambitious, high-quality education. This means that their experience of the curriculum is limited, and they do not make sufficient progress. The school should ensure that the needs of pupils with SEND are met, that they have full access to the curriculum and achieve well. Sometimes pupils do not behave well and the behaviour policy is not consistently
p.4
4
effective. This means lessons are disrupted, pupils do not follow positive routines, and that incidents of poor behaviour occur frequently. The number of suspensions is high and pupils with SEND are disproportionately affected due to a lack of alternative support for them. The school should ensure that reasonable adjustments are made for pupils with SEND. Systems should be embedded effectively and staff supported to secure positive behaviour from pupils across the school. Pupils’ wider development is not prioritised. This means that pupils do not securely understand key aspects of life in modern Britain, and are not ready for their next stage of schooling. The school should ensure that this area is prioritised and a high-quality programme implemented well. Governance of the school is not holding leaders to account sufficiently well. This means that poor quality is not being sufficiently challenged, and the strategic
p.4
4
direction needed to make rapid improvements is not in place, to the detriment of pupils. The school should strengthen its governance arrangements to ensure that the necessary expertise, consistent systems and high-quality strategic oversight are in place to support and challenge leaders to improve the school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school. 28 and 29 February 2024
p.4
5
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 28 and 29 February 2024
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Headteacher Joanna Po (Interim Headteacher)
p.6
School details
Website http://www.bevington.rbkc.sch.uk
p.6
School details
Dates of previous inspection 11 July 2012, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The interim headteacher was appointed in September 2022. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the interim headteacher, interim deputy headteacher and members of the senior leadership team. They also spoke with a representative of the local authority and met with members of the governing body. 28 and 29 February 2024
p.6
7
Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, science and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum and reviewed pupils’ work in some other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors considered responses to parent, pupil and staff surveys.
p.7
Inspection team
Karim Ismail, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Sabrina Edwards His Majesty’s Inspector 28 and 29 February 2024
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion