Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Richard Beadnall
- Postcode verified
YO12 4HF
- Name on report verified
Thomas Hinderwell Primary Academy
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received a judgement of requires improvement at its last graded (section 5) inspection, and prior to this was judged to be inadequate. p.1
- New ‘zones’ have been created in the playground to address concerns around poor behaviour at unstructured times. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment3
“Teachers demonstrate secure subject knowledge.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 804
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Chloe Webster Principal Thomas Hinderwell Primary Academy Seamer Road Scarborough North Yorkshire YO12 4HF
p.1
Academy
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 12 April 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received a judgement of requires improvement at its last graded (section 5) inspection, and prior to this was judged to be inadequate.
p.1
Academy
The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.
p.1
Academy
During the inspection, I discussed with you, other senior leaders, representatives of the academy scrutiny committee and a representative of the trust, the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited a number of lessons, looked at pupils’ work and spoke with pupils. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
necessary for the school to become good. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
ensure that the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent from school decreases further so that more pupils are able to access their full learning entitlement.
p.2
Main findings
Since the last inspection in February 2023, you have been appointed as principal. You have overseen a number of changes within the school since your appointment, some of which were under way at the time of the last inspection. Alongside other leaders, you have improved the curriculum and ensured that staff are well trained and well supported to deliver this curriculum with consistency. As a result, the school’s capacity to improve the quality of education that pupils receive has increased. You have also taken steps to improve behaviour within school. There is now a clear and well-understood approach to behaviour, which is having a positive impact.
p.2
Main findings
The focus on staff’s continued professional development has had demonstrable impact on improving the quality of education provided. Teachers demonstrate secure subject knowledge. There is a clear and consistent focus on pupils’ acquisition of key knowledge, skills and vocabulary across the curriculum. Teachers use assessment carefully to understand pupils’ starting points within the curriculum. They use this assessment to structure learning and allow pupils time to embed their learning through frequent revisiting. Lessons are engaging and pupils have positive attitudes to learning.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils can talk about their learning with understanding. For example, in music, pupils can use technical vocabulary with confidence to describe elements of music notation. In science, pupils can explain the process of digestion and the role that the oesophagus plays in food transport and digestion.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have taken decisive action to address the areas for improvement from the last inspection. In partnership with other senior leaders in school and colleagues from the trust, you have reviewed provision within school and made changes where appropriate. Governors who sit on the academy scrutiny committee are well informed and are able to challenge leaders. They hold them to account. Trust representatives have a similar level of understanding of the progress the school has made. The support that the trust has offered has had a positive impact. Some school leaders now offer support to other trust schools. While there has been significant change in school as a result of the improvements you have identified, this has been managed with consideration for staff’s workload and well-being. Staff feel well supported and valued.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have taken swift and effective action to improve pupils’ behaviour within school. New ‘zones’ have been created in the playground to address concerns around poor behaviour at unstructured times. Pupils understand the activities that are allowed in these zones. They engage in positive, collaborative play within them. They move sensibly and calmly around the playground areas. Entry and exit times are calm and orderly. The number of pupils receiving fixed-term exclusions is decreasing. The proportion of pupils are who are persistently absent from school is higher than national figures. This means that these pupils miss a great deal of learning and struggle to catch up. The school is taking positive action to address persistent absence. This is starting to have impact, but there is still more to do to secure lower levels of persistent absence.
p.2
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of David Ross Education Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion