Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Victoria Park Junior School
Summary
David Robinson (lead), Elizabeth Hulse
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Apr 2024
- Inspectors verified
David Robinson, Elizabeth Hulse
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Outstanding
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
M32 0XZ
- Name on report verified
Victoria Park Junior School
- URN verified
106327
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesOutstanding
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Year 6 pupils take pride in being buddies for those in Year 3 and act as excellent role models. p.2
- Behaviour across the school is excellent. p.3
- Pupils have superb attendance at school. p.3
- The school’s systems and procedures around attendance are highly effective. p.3
- High-quality training enables teachers to deliver the curriculum consistently. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In a small number of subjects, some of the important knowledge that pupils should learn is not clear. p.2
- The school has carefully considered the important knowledge that pupils should learn across the majority of the curriculum. p.2
- This makes it difficult for teachers to know what vocabulary they should prioritise when designing lessons. p.2
- However, in a small number of other subjects, the school has not finalised how teachers should do this. p.2
- In a small number of subjects, the school has not finalised its curriculum thinking with regards to the important knowledge pupils should learn, especially in relation to vocabulary. p.3
- The school should ensure that staff check that pupils have the knowledge that they need to make sense of new learning. 9 and 10 April 2024 p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“High-quality training enables teachers to deliver the curriculum consistently.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,118
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Victoria Park Junior School Davyhulme Road East, Stretford, Manchester M32 0XZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Outstanding Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 10 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 9 and 10 April 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils embody the school value of respect at this welcoming school. They strive to meet the school’s high expectations for their behaviour. Year 6 pupils take pride in being buddies for those in Year 3 and act as excellent role models. Pupils behave impeccably and their learning is rarely interrupted. Those pupils who need extra help to manage their emotions are well supported by caring staff.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is ambitious for pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils progress well across the range of learning opportunities that the school provides. Many pupils, including those with SEND, achieve well across the curriculum.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are happy at this school. They know that the school will act upon their suggestions and opinions to make the school the best it can be. For example, reading ambassadors have played an important role in the creation of the new school library. Pupils also trust that staff will help them to resolve any concerns that they may have.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils benefit from the broad range of clubs available to them. These include different sporting activities as well as sewing and cookery clubs. The school ensures that many pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, benefit from these clubs.
p.2
better?
The school has carefully considered the important knowledge that pupils should learn across the majority of the curriculum. The curriculum is ambitious for pupils, including for those with SEND. High-quality training enables teachers to deliver the curriculum consistently. The school has effective systems to identify the additional needs of pupils with SEND. Teachers successfully adapt the delivery of the curriculum content for these pupils. Overall, pupils are well prepared for the next stage of education.
p.2
better?
In a small number of subjects, some of the important knowledge that pupils should learn is not clear. This is especially true for vocabulary. This makes it difficult for teachers to know what vocabulary they should prioritise when designing lessons. As a result, in these subjects, some pupils have gaps in their knowledge and do not learn as well as they could.
p.2
better?
In English and mathematics, teachers check on what pupils know and remember. They quickly address any gaps in knowledge that pupils have. However, in a small number of other subjects, the school has not finalised how teachers should do this. In these subjects, this leads to a small number of pupils having unidentified gaps in important knowledge. At times, these pupils are moved on to new concepts too soon and they struggle to make sense of new learning. 9 and 10 April 2024
p.2
3
Reading sits at the heart of the school curriculum. Pupils read a broad range of books that include novels and poetry. Pupils read with fluency and achieve well. The school has implemented an effective approach to teaching phonics for pupils who are at the early stages of learning to read. Well-trained staff teach the school’s phonics programme consistently. These pupils benefit from regularly reading books that are closely matched to the sounds that they have learned. This helps to build their confidence and experience success when reading.
p.3
3
Pupils are very well mannered. They are courteous and helpful. Behaviour across the school is excellent. Pupils have a strong moral conviction to treat others in the same way that they would like to be treated themselves. Pupils have superb attendance at school. The school’s systems and procedures around attendance are highly effective. Any attendance concerns are swiftly picked up and addressed at an early stage.
p.3
3
The school has carefully selected a broad range of opportunities to enhance pupils’ wider development. For example, pupils understand the hazards of the local train lines. The school ensures that pupils learn about healthy relationships. Pupils take part in a range of community activities such as litter picks and fundraising for local initiatives. This helps them to understand the role that they can play in bringing about positive change.
p.3
3
Governors have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and priorities for further improvement. They provide effective support and challenge linked to the quality of education. Staff value being part of the school. They are positive about what the school has done to further support their workload and well-being. This includes changes to the marking policy and access to training that enables them to deliver the curriculum well.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In a small number of subjects, the school has not finalised its curriculum thinking with regards to the important knowledge pupils should learn, especially in relation to vocabulary. This hinders teachers from designing learning that helps pupils to learn as well as they could. The school should ensure that it finalises its curriculum thinking so that it is clear what pupils should learn and when this knowledge should be taught. In a small number of subjects, the school has not ensured that staff check on pupils’ understanding of the knowledge that they have been taught. As a result, some pupils have gaps in their knowledge. The school should ensure that staff check that pupils have the knowledge that they need to make sense of new learning. 9 and 10 April 2024
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 9 and 10 April 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 1 and 2 October 2013, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school does not use alternative provision. The governing body operates a breakfast club and after-school provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and took this into account in their evaluation. The inspectors completed deep dives in the following subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. As part of the deep dives, the inspectors met with subject leaders to discuss the curriculum, visited lessons, met with teachers and looked at pupils’ work. The inspectors also looked at the curriculum and pupils’ 9 and 10 April 2024
p.5
6
work in some other subjects. The lead inspector observed some pupils read to a familiar adult. The inspectors spoke with the headteacher, other school leaders and members of staff. The lead inspector spoke with members of the governing body, including the chair of governors. He also spoke with a representative of the local authority. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record and took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils. They also considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons. They spoke with groups of pupils about their experiences at school. They also considered the views of pupils shared through Ofsted’s online pupil survey. The inspectors spoke with staff about their workload and well-being. They also
p.6
6
considered the views of staff shared through Ofsted’s online staff survey. The inspectors spoke with some parents and carers. They considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View. This included the free-text responses.
p.6
Inspection team
David Robinson, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Elizabeth Hulse Ofsted Inspector 9 and 10 April 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion