Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Rubadubs Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Rubadubs Nursery Limited
- Group reference verified
RP903117
- Inspection date verified
22 Feb 2024
- Inspectors verified
Trina Lynskey
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
SE23 3EP
- Name on report verified
Rubadubs Nursery
- URN verified
EY490615
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- devise an ambitious curriculum that consistently stimulates and motivates children to engage with their learning through purposeful activities and opportunities throughout the day 29/03/2024 p.4
- However, staff caring for older children deploy themselves effectively, so that sleeping areas are prepared in advance. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Significant weaknesses in leadership and management put children at risk of harm. p.2
- For example, staff practice around sleep is weak which puts all children at risk, especially babies. p.2
- Lack of staff motivation to actively teach means children are not always engaged with their learning or stimulated by purposeful activities and opportunities throughout the p.2
- The manager has failed to ensure that the setting's procedures are fully understood and followed by staff to promote children's safety and welfare. p.2
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance4
“Significant weaknesses in leadership and management put children at risk of harm.” p.2Parents & families4
“Staff use a range of methods to communicate with parents.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,153
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Rubadubs Nursery 17 David's Road, London, Lewisham SE23 3EP
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Significant weaknesses in leadership and management put children at risk of harm. The manager has failed to ensure that the setting's procedures are fully understood and followed by staff to promote children's safety and welfare. For example, staff practice around sleep is weak which puts all children at risk, especially babies.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The curriculum lacks ambition for children. For example, during the inspection, children could access the same play dough activity throughout the day. By the afternoon, few children showed any interest in using shape cutters on dough. Instead children crowded around the new marble run activity, which reduced the impact of this activity on children's learning as they grabbed the pieces and jostled for space. When children engage with interesting activities they show good focus and enjoyment.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Staff do not use their observations of children effectively to plan stimulating and purposeful experiences to help children progress in their development. Some staff have some understanding of the developmental goals for the children in their care. This is particularly in regard to children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), where there are elements of effective practice that help children with SEND progress in their learning. Overall, however, practice is inconsistent.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Overall, children are disengaged from their learning and do not focus for long on any particular task. Leaders have not ensured that staff understand the intended learning of the curriculum. For example, staff do not know how to adapt activities in the pre-school to extend children's learning. This results in children not receiving a good quality of education tailored to meet their individual needs. Staff model good behaviour which supports children to understand what is expected of them and helps to keep them safe. Children demonstrate they know the rules of the setting as they take care on the stairs and cease running indoors when staff instruct them to do so.
p.2
need to do better?
n Staff have a basic understanding of how children learn and this is reflected in the type of activities they design to support children's development. Curriculum planning is not generally based on children's interests. For example, the mark- making table in the pre-school has paper and pencils, another table has play dough and cutters and the book corner contains a range of books. None of these activities engage children imaginatively or help hold their focus for long. Staff tend to take a supervisory role overseeing children as they play. Lack of staff motivation to actively teach means children are not always engaged with their learning or stimulated by purposeful activities and opportunities throughout the
p.2
need to do better?
22 February 2024 day. n Staff do not consider how the activities provided can help deepen children's learning and build on what they already know and can do. The same activity, play dough and a range of cutters, is available in the pre-school and toddler room. Children, particularly in the pre-school, demonstrate they are bored as they run around or move between activities with little focus. Staff encourage children to play but do not plan and sequence learning with inspiring, age- appropriate and exciting activities to motivate them. Children do not get the support they need to gain the key skills needed for their future. n Staff do not have adequate knowledge and understanding of safe sleep practice and guidance. This is evident in the practice observed, particularly in the baby room. The manager has not monitored how staff put any safe sleep training they have received into practice to ensure they can confidently and safely put babies
p.2
need to do better?
down for their nap. This puts children's welfare at risk. n Most children take their daily nap on floor mats. For babies, this element of the daily routine is chaotic as staff attempt to organise mats and bedding. Lack of organisation means staff accidentally give babies the wrong bedding, which is then switched between children. However, staff caring for older children deploy themselves effectively, so that sleeping areas are prepared in advance. This helps older children settle down to sleep. Across the nursery, however, staff do not fit sheets to mats as intended, increasing the risk of entanglement, particularly for babies. Some children do not get a sheet and sleep directly on the plastic mat. Overall, staff do not support children with safe and hygienic sleep routines. n When accidents or incidents arise the manager is unclear about the procedures to follow and which members of the leadership team are responsible for
p.3
need to do better?
implementing the policy. As a result, written record-keeping is disorganised. Furthermore, the provider has failed to notify relevant external agencies of significant incidents in a timely manner as required. This means there is no reliable record of incidents or advice from external agencies that leaders can review to ensure ongoing risk assessment procedures are robust. n The food preparation area is clean and staff involved in food preparation have suitable knowledge and understanding of managing allergies. During mealtimes, staff are preoccupied with monitoring children and distributing food. However, there are some moments where staff take time to promote social conversation between children. Overall, children enjoy their food and they gain some early independence skills as they learn to serve themselves. n Staff do not monitor children's progress effectively. This is reflected in the activities planned and the attitude children have to their learning. When children
p.3
need to do better?
are not engaged they drift away and wander around the room aimlessly. Staff do not encourage some of the quieter children to join others in their play. This means children do not always get the opportunities they need to make good progress in their learning. That said, children are respectful and behave kindly towards their friends when they engage in activities together. n Staff use a range of methods to communicate with parents. In addition to electronic communications, staff use drop off and collection times to give parents an update about their child's day. Managers organise face-to-face
p.3
need to do better?
22 February 2024 parents' evenings to share information about children's development. This helps to keep parents updated about their child's progress.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.4
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.4
Due date
devise an ambitious curriculum that consistently stimulates and motivates children to engage with their learning through purposeful activities and opportunities throughout the day 29/03/2024
p.4
Due date
use assessment to understand children's individual needs, interests and development to offer quality learning and development experiences that help them make good progress 29/03/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure all staff know how to put babies down to sleep safely in line with the latest safety guidance 29/03/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure that there is an adequate supply of bedding that it is fit for purpose and that bedding is not shared between children to promote good hygiene practices and safe, restful sleep 29/03/2024
p.4
Due date
establish robust procedures to manage accidents, including keeping written records and ensuring all staff understand the procedures to follow 29/03/2024
p.4
Due date
notify relevant external agencies including Ofsted of any serious incident and of the action taken. 29/03/2024
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY490615 Local authority Lewisham Inspection number 10305510 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.6
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.6
inspection
Total number of places 66 Number of children on roll 72 Name of registered person Rubadubs Nursery Limited
p.6
reference number
Telephone number 020 8699 0782 Date of previous inspection 23 February 2018
p.6
Information about this early years setting
Rubadubs Nursery re-registered in 2015. It is located in the Forest Hill area in the London Borough of Lewisham. The nursery is open Monday to Friday from 8am to 6pm, all year round, except on public bank holidays. The nursery employs 16 staff who work directly with the children, including the manager, 12 of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications. The nursery receives funding for free early years education for children aged two, three and four years.
p.6
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID 19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The manager and inspector completed a learning walk together of all areas of the nursery and discussed the early years curriculum. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector observed the quality of education provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector carried out a joint observation of an activity with the manager. n The manager shared the methods of communication used to share information and how the setting gets regular feedback from parents n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the
p.7
Inspection activities
suitability of staff working in the nursery.
p.7
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.7
Inspection activities
22 February 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.8
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion