Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Pickering Community Junior School

Inspected 21 Mar 2024 · published 9 May 2024 · URN 121356

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jane Wilson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    21 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Jane Wilson

  • Postcode verified

    YO18 8AJ

  • Name on report verified

    Pickering Community Junior School

  • URN verified

    121356

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositivehigh expectationsambitiouswell sequencedstrongmake good progresswell led
Criticismseriousdisruptionconcernsnot yetmissedlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1084w+58
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,089
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 55
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Pickering Community Junior School Middleton Road, Pickering, North Yorkshire YO18 8AJ

p.1

Outcome

Pickering Community Junior School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pickering Community Junior School is a happy and vibrant place to be. Pupils enjoy warm, respectful relationships with staff. They enjoy sharing their experiences of school, including how staff use humour and funny sayings to address various aspects of school life. Pupils see themselves as valued, active participants in creating the school’s positive culture and in solving any problems that may arise.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have many opportunities to hold positions of responsibility. These positions are highly prized because pupils feel that their views are listened to. When issues occur in school, junior leadership groups, such as the school council and the newly relaunched Rainbow Rockets, work with staff to try and find solutions. The school is very much a community with pupil voice at the very heart of all decision-making.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have high expectations for all pupils. The school’s approach to managing behaviour has been revised since the previous inspection, and pupils value having opportunities to take responsibility for their actions and to work through problems. This ensures that every pupil develops the behaviours they need to be a successful learner. Pupils work hard to follow the school’s ‘To Care’ motto. They enjoy their lessons and apply themselves to their learning. As a result, they are achieving well in lessons.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have worked tirelessly to gain support from parents to improve pupils’ attendance, which is now in line with that seen nationally. This is having a very positive impact on both outcomes and pupils’ well-being.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum is ambitious and well sequenced. Staff have adopted consistent approaches to delivery in lessons so that pupils have a secure understanding of previously taught knowledge and concepts before moving on. For the majority of pupils this is working well, and they now remember more about what they have previously learned. However, the school has, rightly, identified that pupils could achieve more in some 20 and 21 March 2024

p.1

2

subjects at the end of key stage 2. Leaders have been systematic in reviewing practice and implementing changes where necessary. They have already identified that the most able pupils are not being sufficiently challenged at the start of mathematics lessons. Work has already begun to address this issue, but it is not yet fully embedded across the school.

p.2

2

The school has recently been doing lots of work to further develop the reading offer to ensure that all pupils are fluent readers. Reading is part of every pupil’s day. Phonics sessions are integral to the daily routine for those still at the early stages of learning to read. The school makes sure that all pupils have access to a range of beautiful books, many of which have only recently been published. Teachers inspire a love of reading by reading aloud whole-class texts. Pupils can be seen eagerly anticipating every word.

p.2

2

The computing curriculum is very strong and pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education. The school is keen for all pupils to do their best. Independent activities are carefully planned in all lessons to ensure that pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and other disadvantaged pupils, make good progress. Pupils’ behaviour does not disrupt learning. There is a clear sense of purpose in lessons, and low-level disruption is minimal. If pupils seem to be losing focus, staff are quick to bring their attention back.

p.2

2

Pupils’ broader development is carefully considered and planned for. The school ensures that pupils receive appropriate personal, social and health education (PSHE) that includes relationships and sex education. Pupils learn to keep themselves safe in their day-to-day lives, including online. The school carefully adapts the PSHE curriculum to take account of pupils’ needs and experiences and also in response to issues in the local community.

p.2

2

The school is well led and managed. Leaders, even those new to role, have a clear and precise understanding of what is working well and what needs to be improved or adapted to ensure that pupils receive the education they deserve. Staff are very positive about how they are supported to further develop their subject knowledge and teaching. Those responsible for governance bring a broad range of expertise, which they use effectively to support and challenge school leaders.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Activities at the start of mathematics lessons do not provide sufficient challenge for the most able pupils. This means that opportunities to extend and deepen pupils’ mathematical thinking are missed. The school should continue to review the content of these sessions to ensure that tasks are pitched at the right level to maximise progress for all pupils. 20 and 21 March 2024

p.2

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in December 2014.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 20 and 21 March 2024

p.3

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

School details

Website www.pickering-jun.n-yorks.sch.uk

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 21 November 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 The school runs a breakfast club.  The school has a formal working agreement with Pickering Infant and Nursery School.  The school does not use alternative education provision.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspector met with the headteacher and other leaders. The inspector spoke with groups of staff and pupils. She met with members of the governing body and with representatives of the local authority.  The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, computing and mathematics. For each deep dive, the inspector held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their 20 and 21 March 2024

p.4

5

learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspector also looked at samples of pupils’ writing from across the curriculum.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and around the school site.  The inspector spoke with parents at the school gates. She also considered the responses to Ofsted’s survey, Ofsted Parent View, and to Ofsted’s survey for staff.  The inspector reviewed a range of documents, including the school improvement plan and minutes of governing body meetings.

p.5

Inspection team

Jane Wilson, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 20 and 21 March 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion