Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Mary of Charity CofE (Aided) Primary School

Inspected 6 Mar 2024 · URN 141220

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Stuart

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    James Stuart

  • Postcode verified

    ME13 8AP

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary of Charity C of E (Aided) Primary School

  • URN verified

    141220

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingpositiveambitiousenjoyhigh expectationsconsistentlywell-plannedstrong
Criticismnot alwaysseriousconcernsdo not knownot rigorousnot preciselowernot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1367w+54
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,367
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection of an outstanding school: St Mary of Charity C of E (Aided) Primary School Orchard Place, Faversham, Kent ME13 8AP

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of outstanding as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

Outcome

The headteacher of this school is Louise Rowley-Jones. This school is part of Aquilla Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Annie Wiles, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Sue Butterworth.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy being at this school. They understand the school’s values, including respect, determination, honesty and forgiveness, and aspire to live up to them. Expectations are high. Classrooms are calm and purposeful places to learn. Pupils behave well and have positive relationships with staff. Children starting in Reception classes settle quickly because of the support they receive.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is ambitious for pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils embrace the learning opportunities that the school provides for them. This was exemplified in one parent’s comment to inspectors, ‘Teachers have been thoughtful about the support they provide and have enabled my child to be a successful and happy member of the school community.’ As a result of the support and encouragement that pupils receive, they are keen to learn, and most achieve well during their time at the school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are very proud of their school, eagerly undertaking leadership roles. These experiences help to develop their confidence and resilience. The leadership roles involve being playleaders, well-being leads, librarians and school counsellors. Pupils understand what it means to be a responsible member of the school. They are keen to make positive contributions that benefit the school community. Pupils develop confidence and resilience. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has rightly prioritised the development of an ambitious and well-planned curriculum, starting from the early years. A new rigorous phonics programme was introduced last year, and a new mathematics scheme is in the process of being implemented. As a result, in most subjects, the curriculum thinking clearly sets out the precise skills and knowledge that pupils need to learn. In a small number of other subjects, ongoing work is addressing an identified need to refine the curriculum further. This development work is having a positive impact on current pupils’ achievement. However, much of the curriculum is new. As yet, the impact of this curriculum development work on pupils’ outcomes, including recent statutory assessments, is still evolving. As a result, while pupils learn and recall important knowledge in their subjects, there are times when their understanding is not as secure and detailed as leaders intend.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Most subjects are taught well. In-depth curriculum thinking supports teachers’ understanding of the subjects they teach. Staff are trained and supported well to implement the new curriculum successfully. This is especially evident in mathematics, where teachers bring the subject to life. New learning is broken down and explained in a way that helps pupils to understand. Pupils get plenty of practice with new concepts, which helps them to develop fluency. In most subjects, teachers use assessment well to understand what pupils do and do not know, and then use this information to adapt the learning. In a few subjects, the school is developing and refining how they do this, to ensure that the work given to pupils always builds precisely on what they already know.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils are enthusiastic about books and reading. The school has created a culture where books are shared and enjoyed by all. The new phonics programme helps most pupils to learn to read quickly and accurately. Older pupils enjoy an array of authors through the books that are read to them by teachers. Pupils are encouraged to read at home. As a result, most pupils become confident and fluent readers. However, the small number of pupils who find learning to read difficult do not always receive the expert support that they need to catch up quickly with their peers.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils behave well. The school has high expectations, which are consistently applied. Consequently, pupils are polite, thoughtful and caring towards each other. Parents say how apparent it is to see the values of the school played out each day. Pupils’ attitudes are further enhanced by the school’s well-organised personal, social, health and economic education provision and the broad range of trips and clubs on offer.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pastoral care is a strength. Staff work closely with families to help improve pupils’ attendance where this is necessary. The school is very inclusive. There are strong systems in place to identify and assess the needs of pupils with SEND. Detailed information helps teachers to provide pupils with well-considered support, reflecting high aspirations for every child. Consequently, pupils with SEND make good progress from their starting points.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school is well led. There is ongoing consideration of staff workload and well-being. Consequently, staff feel valued and supported. However, those responsible for governance 5 and 6 March 2024

p.2

3

are not always sufficiently rigorous when checking that statutory duties are fulfilled and in challenging leaders about the quality of education.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Support for pupils in the early stages of learning to read is not always precise enough. Consequently, they do not catch up quickly with their peers. The school should ensure that expert teaching supports all pupils in swiftly becoming proficient readers.  Plans to further refine curriculum planning and the use of assessment are not fully in place. Consequently, there are occasions when learning in lessons does not reflect leaders’ ambition, or match pupils’ needs, as well as it could. The school should ensure that current improvement work in these areas enables pupils to learn and achieve consistently well across the whole curriculum.  Governance oversight of statutory duties and standards in the school is not always as precise as it could be. This reduces how effectively leaders are held to account for standards in the school. The board of trustees should ensure that it, and the governing body that supports it, has the shared knowledge and understanding to fulfil its role

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

with even greater rigour so that standards are raised even further.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be outstanding, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains outstanding. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be outstanding in July 2018.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.3

4

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 5 and 6 March 2024

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 10 and 11 July 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is a Church of England primary school in the Diocese of Canterbury. The school underwent a Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools under section 48 of the Education Act in 2017. The next inspection is due within eight years of the previous inspection.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met and spoke with leaders, staff, pupils, parents, governors, trustees and the CEO of the trust. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.5

6

 The inspection team carried out deep dives into these subjects: early reading, mathematics and art. They discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, teachers and pupils, visited lessons and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also met with leaders to discuss curriculum thinking in history and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors considered 43 responses to the Ofsted Parent View questionnaire. They took account of the responses to the confidential staff survey as well as the views of pupils that were gathered throughout the inspection.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors met with the school’s special educational needs and/or disabilities

p.6

Inspection team

James Stuart, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 5 and 6 March 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion