Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Rose Lane Primary School

Inspected 24 Jan 2024 · published 7 May 2024 · URN 101224

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Jan 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Ian Scotchbrook, Katerina Christodoulou, Nick Turvey, Robert Grice

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    RM6 5NJ

  • Name on report verified

    Rose Lane Primary School

  • URN verified

    101224

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoywell supportedeffectivelyeffectivestrengthsambitiouswarmpolite
Criticismweaknessestoo manynot consistentlygapsstruggleconcernsfall behindinconsistencies

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1122w+0
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve33w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,125
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of Rose Lane Primary School Rose Lane, Chadwell Heath, Romford, Essex RM6 5NJ

p.1

Inspection dates: 23 and 24 January 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 23 and 24 January 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy attending Rose Lane Primary School. Much consideration has been given to pupils’ social and emotional development. This ensures pupils feel secure and are kept safe in school. The school provides a range of after-school additional activities, including extra classes for pupils in Year 6.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy learning a wide range of subjects. Leaders have designed a broad and ambitious curriculum. While pupils learn effectively in some subjects, this is not consistent. There is too much variability in how well the curriculum is implemented, and expectations of what pupils can achieve are not high enough. For example, too many pupils do not read at the level expected for their age. As a result, some pupils are not as well prepared as they need to be for the next stage of their education.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Relationships around the school are warm. Pupils are polite and friendly. While many pupils behave well, there are some classes in which learning is disrupted. Pupils engage positively with adults and with each other at playtimes. However, some pupils do not feel listened to when they raise concerns about bullying. A small number of pupils use derogatory language. This is not tackled consistently by all staff.

p.2

better?

Leaders have identified the important knowledge that pupils should learn in each subject and the order in which the curriculum should be taught. In some subjects, the planned curriculum is well implemented. In these instances, pupils are well supported to learn and remember more over time. For example, in history, pupils learn about the different ways societies are ruled and governed. Older pupils can compare and contrast concepts such as monarchy, democracy and oligarchy. Similarly, in mathematics, pupils learn and practise number bonds and multiplication tables. This helps them develop mathematical fluency and gives them the confidence to tackle and explain more complex problems.

p.2

better?

In other subjects, however, the work that pupils complete has not been carefully thought through. Pupils are sometimes asked to complete tasks and activities which do not build on their previous learning. In these subjects, pupils find it difficult to remember and apply the content they have been taught over time. There is too much variability in the way assessment is used to check what pupils have learned. As a result, errors and misconceptions are not identified or addressed swiftly. This means some pupils have gaps in their knowledge and struggle to understand more complex ideas.

p.2

better?

Pupils enjoy reading and being read to. Pupils can talk confidently about the books they enjoy reading. This begins in early years, where staff develop children’s language skills effectively. For example, children enjoy joining in with familiar stories, rhymes and songs. However, staff do not have sufficient knowledge to teach phonics well. The strategies pupils should use to help them read unfamiliar words are not 23 and 24 January 2024

p.2

3

modelled with accuracy or precision. As a result, too many pupils do not keep up with the pace of the phonics programme. The school provides additional support for pupils who fall behind. However, these interventions have not yet had the desired impact. This means too many pupils struggle to read or spell with adequate fluency. This limits the confidence and accuracy with which they access the broader curriculum.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are accurately identified. Pupils who attend the additionally resourced provision are well supported. Although leaders seek advice from external agencies, sometimes pupils’ individual needs are not recognised early enough. This delays the tailored support they need. There are some inconsistencies in the way teaching helps pupils with SEND to access the planned curriculum.

p.3

3

Most pupils behave well. However, there are classes in which behaviour is challenging. Leaders recognise this. They have implemented strategies to encourage and reward positive behaviour. The school also provides sessions to help pupils express and explore their feelings. This has not had sufficient time to embed. Learning in some classes continues to be disrupted. Leaders have taken effective action to ensure that pupils attend school regularly and on time.

p.3

3

Leaders’ work to encourage pupils’ personal development is well considered. Pupils take on roles of responsibility, such as representing their class on the school council. They vote on different themes to express their views. The school enables pupils to develop an understanding of the fundamental British values of democracy, mutual respect and tolerance. There are opportunities for pupils to develop their talents and interests through a range of additional enrichment activities.

p.3

3

The governing body does not have sufficient knowledge of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. This means that it is unable to check that school leaders’ self- evaluation and priorities are accurate. Staff, including those at the start of their careers, feel well supported by leaders in managing their well-being and workload. They value the opportunities to develop professionally.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Assessment is not used effectively to check what pupils understand. This leads to gaps in pupils’ knowledge because misconceptions are not consistently identified or addressed. The school should ensure that pupils’ knowledge and understanding are routinely checked before introducing new content. 23 and 24 January 2024

p.3

4

 Not enough pupils develop the phonics knowledge required to decode unfamiliar words. This limits their reading accuracy, fluency and confidence. The school must ensure that staff have appropriate training and support to implement the agreed phonics curriculum with consistency and precision.  Governors do not check systematically that the school’s curriculum, policies and procedures are having the intended impact. As a result, there is an overly generous view of the school’s effectiveness. Those responsible for governance should ensure that they have an accurate, strategic overview of the school’s strengths and weaknesses so that they can hold leaders sufficiently to account for the school’s performance.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 23 and 24 January 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 3 and 4 October 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Since their last inspections, Marks Gate Infant School and Marks Gate Junior School amalgamated to become Rose Lane Primary School.  Currently, the school uses one registered and one unregistered alternative provider of education.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspection team completed deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, history and religious education. For each deep dive, inspectors held 23 and 24 January 2024

p.5

6

discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including leaders’ evaluation of the school and priorities for improvement.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, senior leaders, subject leaders and a selection of teachers and non-teaching support staff.  Inspectors held discussions with the chair and other members of the governing body, as well as a representative of the local authority.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The views of pupils, parents and staff were gathered through discussion and their

p.6

Inspection team

Robert Grice, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Katerina Christodoulou Ofsted Inspector 23 and 24 January 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion