Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Orchards Nursery School

Inspected 21 Mar 2024 · published 7 May 2024 · URN 105145

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Robinson (lead), Victoria Burnside

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    21 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    David Robinson, Victoria Burnside

  • Postcode verified

    BL4 0RA

  • Name on report verified

    The Orchards Nursery School

  • URN verified

    105145

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveenjoypositiveskilledhigh expectationseffectivelyambitioushappy
Criticismgapsseriousdisruptionconcernslowerdo not knownot well preparednot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings735w+68
  • Safeguarding431w−49

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,164
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%Safeguarding 25%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: The Orchards Nursery School Lower Orchards, Highfield Road, Farnworth, Bolton, Lancashire BL4 0RA

p.1

Outcome

The Orchards Nursery School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Children make a positive start to their education at this welcoming school. The school is ambitious for children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Building independence is an important aspect of the school’s ambition for its children. Skilled staff help children learn the knowledge and skills to realise this. Many children, including those with SEND, achieve well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Children work hard to meet the school’s high expectations for their behaviour. Staff promote positive behaviour from the moment children join the two-year-old provision. Children learn the importance of sharing and cooperating with one another. Staff provide effective support for those children who need extra help with their behaviour. Older children learn how to care for others, such as checking on a friend when they are upset.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Children are happy and enjoy coming to school. They readily engage with the exciting learning activities. Children learn to be responsible through activities such as caring for chicks and tidying up. They also learn about people who help others in a community, gaining particular delight in visits from firefighters and police officers.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has created a broad and interesting curriculum. The school has identified much of the important knowledge that staff will teach and the order in which children will learn it. Across many areas of the curriculum, staff are well trained in educating young children, including two-year-olds. In the main, children, including those with SEND, are well prepared for their next steps.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In a small number of areas across the curriculum, the school has not identified some of the important knowledge that children should learn in sufficient detail. This makes it tricky for staff to know what they should prioritise when designing learning activities. As a result, in these areas of learning, some children do not gain a deep knowledge. 21 March 2024

p.1

2

Across much of the curriculum, staff design learning activities that build on what children already know. Staff use opportunities to address any gaps in knowledge that children have. However, in a small number of areas, staff are not as clear on what children do and do not know. This is because the school does not check on what key knowledge children have learned in these few areas.

p.2

2

The school has effective systems in place to identify and assess the additional needs of children with SEND. Carefully considered support and resources ensure that children with SEND access the same curriculum as their classmates.

p.2

2

Children attending the specially resourced provision for children with SEND (specially resourced provision) follow the curriculum alongside their peers. Staff tailor learning activities to meet these children’s individual needs well. Staff are skilled in developing children’s language and communication skills, as well as supporting their social interactions. The school works effectively with parents and carers and a range of external professionals to support these children successfully.

p.2

2

Staff understand how to support children’s language development effectively. Staff enable children to use words and gestures to ask questions and communicate their ideas confidently. Staff carefully choose books that help children to develop their vocabulary. Children, including two-year-olds, know and enjoy many different stories, rhymes and songs.

p.2

2

Children behave well. This is because staff teach them how to care for one another, look after resources and to respect adults. Children become deeply involved in their learning because there is little disruption to their activities. They follow routines and enjoy the praise that they get for their positive behaviours. Any children who need extra help to manage their emotions are supported well by nurturing staff.

p.2

2

Children benefit from a range of opportunities to broaden their personal development. For example, they learn about different festivals, visit the pantomime and enjoy themed days in school. Staff teach children to be independent and to make important choices about their own health. For example, children are encouraged to eat healthily. At snack time, they eat fruit and vegetables. Children are also taught the importance of hygiene, such as washing their hands before sitting down for a snack.

p.2

2

Governors have a secure understanding of the quality of education provided by the school. They offer effective support and challenge. The school is considerate of staff’s workload and well-being when making decisions about policies and procedures. Staff value being part of the close-knit team.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

3

 In some areas of learning, the school has not identified the important knowledge that children should learn in enough detail. This hinders staff in knowing what learning they should prioritise when designing activities and slows some children’s learning. This contributes to some children not deepening their knowledge as well as they could. The school should finalise their curriculum thinking in these areas of learning.  In a small number of areas, at times, staff do not check on children’s understanding of the key knowledge in the curriculum. As a result, in these areas, some children are not as well prepared for the next stage of education as they could be. The school should ensure that staff identify and address any gaps in key knowledge that children may have.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in December 2013.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 21 March 2024

p.3

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

School details

Website www.theorchardsfederation.org.uk

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 16 October 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Orchard Federation which comprises of three schools.  The executive headteacher of the federation is Andrew Feeley, who is also the headteacher of this school.  The school operates a specially resourced provision for children with SEND. This caters for two-year-old children with profound and multiple learning disabilities. At the time of the inspection, there were 5 children on roll at the specially resourced provision.  The school does not make use of alternative provision.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken this into account in their evaluation.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these areas of learning: communication and language, mathematics and personal, social and emotional development. For each 21 March 2024

p.4

5

deep dive, the inspectors met with curriculum leaders, visited a sample of lessons and spoke to staff. Inspectors spoke with children when visiting lessons and considered their work.  The inspectors spoke with the headteacher, other school leaders and members of staff.  The lead inspector spoke with members of the governing body, including the chair of governors. The lead inspector also spoke with a representative of the local authority.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record and took account of the views of leaders and staff. They also considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children’s interests first.  The inspectors observed children’s behaviour in lessons and at social times.  The inspectors spoke with staff about their workload and well-being. They also considered the views of staff shared through Ofsted’s online staff survey.

p.5

5

 The inspectors spoke with some parents and carers. They considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View. This included the free-text responses.

p.5

Inspection team

David Robinson, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Victoria Burnside His Majesty's Inspector 21 March 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion