Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Mereside Church of England Primary Academy

Inspected 20 Mar 2024 · URN 147106

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Barry Yeardsley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Barry Yeardsley

  • Postcode verified

    SY2 6LE

  • Name on report verified

    Mereside Church of England Primary Academy

  • URN verified

    147106

Page 4 of 7
Page 4 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 22% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoysupportivepositivehigh expectationseffectivestrongtrusting relationshipscaring
Criticismnot alwaysseriouslackseriouslyinconsistencyconcernsnot yetlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1386w+26
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,388
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 61, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Mereside Church of England Primary Academy Mereside, Springfield, Shrewsbury, Shropshire SY2 6LE

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

Outcome

The executive principal of this school is Laura Hopley. This school is part of St Chad’s Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Sarah Cockshott, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Anthony Orlik. There is also a head of school, Lindsay Hughes.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Mereside is a caring and supportive school that puts the pupils first. Pupils say that teachers are kind and help them to learn. They say that love is a key value of the school. There are strong and trusting relationships between adults and pupils. Community, wisdom, hope, dignity, joy and peace are all celebrated. Pupils enjoy earning heart pin badges for being values champions. Many parents and carers are positive about the school and appreciate how staff care for and support their children.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

New leaders who are supported well by the academy trust have made significant and positive changes to many aspects of the school. They have set high expectations for pupils. The school has strengthened its behaviour systems. Pupils have responded well to this. They behave well in class and around school. They enjoy the activities that are provided by sports coaches when on the playground.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy learning in school. They talk keenly about their recent learning. However, in some subjects, they do not remember important knowledge that has been taught over time.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils learn the importance of treating others fairly and with respect. As one pupil said, ‘Everyone is different and we should celebrate this. It would be boring if we were all the same.’ 19 and 20 March 2024

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has set out a curriculum that supports teachers to know what to teach and when to teach it. It has identified the important knowledge, skills and vocabulary that pupils need to know. As a result, teaching builds on what pupils have been taught previously. For example, in geography, children in Reception learn about the local area and where they live. Pupils in key stage 1 learn about the United Kingdom and its capital cities. Then, in key stage 2, they learn about a range of other countries, using maps and atlases to locate them. However, in some subjects the activities that are provided do not always help all pupils to learn and remember what has been delivered over time.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has put in place a new phonics curriculum. All staff have received training in this. Phonics lessons now make sure that pupils learn and practise the sounds that are being taught. This includes those pupils who the school has identified need extra support to read in year 2 and key stage 2. In addition, staff ensure that pupils get lots of opportunities to practise the sounds they are learning by providing pupils with books that are well matched to their stage of learning. However, despite these strengths, some staff lack expertise in delivering the school’s phonics programme. This slows the learning of some pupils.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils enjoy reading across the curriculum. The school has made sure that there is a range of texts for pupils to study and enjoy. Many pupils have favourite books and authors.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are fully included in all aspects of school life. Their needs are identified quicky, and support is put in place. The school liaises well with external agencies. Those with specific needs, including those with social and emotional needs, receive tailored and effective support, including in the ‘learning lounge’. However, in some lessons, teachers do not make sure the work given enables pupils with SEND to learn as well as they could.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has organised a variety of visits and invited guests to engage pupils in the curriculum. Pupils enjoy visits, for instance, to a museum and an aquarium as part of the science curriculum. Furthermore, pupils are given responsibilities, such as being school councillors, sports leaders and reading ambassadors. They think these roles are important and take them seriously. The school council is determined that all areas of the school will be tidy. One pupil leader commented, ‘We help to make our school a better place to be.’

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have ensured that staff are listened to and they get the time they need to carry out their role. Staff appreciate this.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The local academy committee are supportive and keen for the school to do well. However, it has recently undergone several changes. It does not yet have a sufficiently detailed understanding of the school’s performance and its curriculum to enable it to fully challenge and hold leaders to account. 19 and 20 March 2024

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Not all staff are experts in delivering the school’s phonics programme. Consequently, there is some inconsistency in how well the early reading curriculum is delivered. This means that some pupils do not make as much progress as they could with their reading. The school should ensure that all staff receive the necessary support to teach phonics effectively.  In some subjects the activities provided do not always help all pupils to learn and remember what has been delivered over time. As a result, some pupils do not remember as much as they could. Leaders should ensure that staff provide activities which support pupils to remember more across the curriculum.  Teachers do not always adapt learning well for pupils with SEND in some subjects. Consequently, pupils with SEND do not make as much progress as they could in these subjects. The school should ensure that work for pupils with SEND is closely matched

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

to fully meet pupils’ needs to help them to learn more.  Recently, there have been significant changes to the governance of the school. Some governors are new to their role or have been recently appointed. As a result, governors are still developing a secure understanding of the effectiveness of the school and its curriculum. Governors should continue to develop their role so that they hold leaders fully to account for the school’s performance.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the predecessor school, Mereside Church of England Primary School, to be good in June 2014. 19 and 20 March 2024

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 19 and 20 March 2024

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school makes use of one registered alternative provider.  The school is part of St Chad’s Academies Trust, which consists of 19 schools.  The school is within the Diocese of Litchfield. Its most recent section 48 inspection took place in September 2023. The school’s next section 48 inspection will take place within five years of its last inspection.  The inspector was aware during this inspection that a serious incident occurred at the setting since the previous inspection. While Ofsted does not have the power to investigate incidents of this kind, actions taken by the school in response to the incident was considered alongside the other evidence available at the time of the inspection to inform inspector’s judgements.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 19 and 20 March 2024

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and has taken that into account in his evaluation of the school.  During the inspection, the inspector held meetings with the executive principal and the head of school. He also met three members of the local academy committee, including the chair of the committee. He met two trustees, including the chair of the trust. The inspector also held meetings with the CEO and senior school improvement partners of the trust.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics and geography. He

p.6

6

met with subject leaders, visited lessons, spoke with teachers and pupils and viewed examples of pupils’ work. The inspector also spoke to pupils about science, history and art and design.  The inspector observed children in the early years and pupils in key stages 1 and 2 read to a trusted adult.  The inspector spoke with members of staff about their workload and well-being.  The inspector observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around school.  The inspector considered the responses, including the free-text comments, to Ofsted Parent View. He also considered the responses to the staff and pupil surveys. The inspector spoke to parents at the end of the school day.  The inspector looked at a range of documentation that was provided by the school. This included the school’s self-evaluation, school improvement priorities, school policies, curriculum documents, SEND records, behaviour records, attendance records

p.6

6

and minutes of meetings held by the governing body and trust.

p.6

Inspection team

Barry Yeardsley, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 19 and 20 March 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion