Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Frogmore Junior School

Inspected 6 Mar 2024 · published 1 May 2024 · URN 139944

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lea Hannam

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Lea Hannam

  • Postcode verified

    GU17 0NY

  • Name on report verified

    Frogmore Junior School

  • URN verified

    139944

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 64% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivehigh expectationsvery wellflourishingambitiousstronghigh-quality
Criticismnot yetseriousseriouslyconcernsstrugglelower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1110w+58
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,114
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Frogmore Junior School Green Lane, Frogmore, Frogmore Junior School, Camberley, Surrey GU17 0NY

p.1

Outcome

Frogmore Junior School continues to be a good school.

p.1

Outcome

The headteacher of this school is Emma Rodziewicz. This school is part of GLF Schools Multi-Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Julian Drinkall, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Lynne O’Reilly.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a happy, inclusive school. Warm relationships permeate all aspects of school life. Pupils feel safe and know that staff always listen to them. Their voice matters. Staff put their pupils at the heart of every action they take. There are high expectations for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Typically, pupils achieve well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Rights and responsibilities are at the centre of the school’s aims. Pupils understand these very well. A culture of respect runs through the school. Pupils make sure that lessons are productive places to be because they know everyone has a ‘right to an education’ and a ‘right to be listened to’. Pupils strive to ‘get to gold’ by working hard and showing acts of kindness. They love discovering whose name is written in the platinum book, the highest behaviour award in the school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy the leadership responsibilities they have. They take them seriously and look out for each other. For example, pupils made sure that the new ‘trim trail’ is accessible for all of their friends. They are currently working with a local councillor to make the road outside the school safer.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has introduced an ambitious trust-wide curriculum for all pupils recently, including those with SEND. The curriculum identifies knowledge and skills for each subject well. Teachers know exactly what to teach and when to teach it. They emphasise important vocabulary well in lessons, encouraging pupils to practise and use new words successfully. On the whole, outcomes at the end of key stage 2 in English and mathematics in 2023 were in line with the national picture. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.1

2

The school has high aspirations that all pupils will succeed and play a full part in school life. It identifies and considers pupils’ additional needs effectively. Teachers write precise and useful targets for pupils with SEND. They adapt learning effectively when needed. Pupils with SEND are flourishing and learning well.

p.2

2

Even with the curriculum being fairly new, delivery is effective. Pupils show high levels of concentration. Lessons are productive. The school ensures that teachers are well prepared. Consequently, staff have a strong and growing level of expertise. They follow the school’s agreed approach to teaching. They present information clearly. Effective training and work with the trust’s cluster schools have contributed well to this. Staff morale is high. The trust contributes a wealth of expertise and skills. Trustees and governors are well informed about the quality of education that the school provides for pupils. Local governors carry out delegated statutory responsibilities with diligence.

p.2

2

Pupils remember their current learning well. Teachers check what pupils know in lessons effectively. They spot misconceptions and give clear and effective feedback to pupils. However, pupils struggle to remember key learning over longer periods of time in some subjects. The school has not yet considered fully exactly what it wants pupils to learn in the longer term in these subjects, and how it can support pupils in securing this learning consistently well. This means pupils are not yet achieving as highly as they could in these subjects.

p.2

2

Reading is a priority across the school. The school has identified high-quality children’s literature for pupils to read and study. These carefully chosen texts reflect the school’s commitment to diversity and inclusion. The school has a well-established phonics programme. This helps pupils who join the school still at the early stages of reading very effectively. Pupils benefit from daily phonics lessons and expert tutoring, which helps them catch up.

p.2

2

The school’s work on pupils’ personal development is a strength. Pupils debate moral and ethical issues regularly. Pupils respect the views of others, politely disagreeing if need be. Pupils celebrate difference. They run assemblies about additional needs found in the school, such as autism and physical disabilities. Pupils say this helps them to understand their friends better. Pupils benefit from a wide range of opportunities that develop their talents and interests well, such as clubs, trips and residentials.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some foundation subjects, the school has not identified the most important learning that pupils need to secure over time. This limits how well teachers can check what pupils have remembered, and how well pupils know what they need to for future 5 and 6 March 2024

p.2

3

learning. The school should ensure that clear curricular goals are in place for all subjects so that pupils achieve highly.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in October 2018.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 5 and 6 March 2024

p.3

School details

Dates of previous inspection 2 and 3 October 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 Since the last inspection, the school joined the GLF Schools Multi-Academy Trust in October 2019.  The headteacher took up her role in September 2023, after being head of school. Both assistant headteachers are new to post since the last inspection.  The school does not currently use any alternative provision.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in the evaluation of the school.  The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, the inspector discussed the curriculum with subject 5 and 6 March 2024

p.4

5

leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspector also heard pupils read to a member of staff.  The inspector also looked at other aspects of the school’s curriculum.  The inspector met with leaders, staff and pupils. She also met with the chief executive officer, the interim primary director and the regional director from the trust.  The inspector held a meeting with the chair of the trustees of the GLF trust, one further trustee and two members of the local governing committee, including the chair.  The inspector spoke with groups of pupils about their experiences at school. She considered the views of pupils shared through Ofsted’s online survey for pupils.  The inspector spoke with staff about their workload and well-being. She considered the views of staff shared through Ofsted’s online survey for staff.

p.5

5

 The inspector considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.5

Inspection team

Lea Hannam, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 March 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion