Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Redbridge Alternative Provision

Inspected 14 Mar 2024 · URN 134366

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Francis Gonzalez (lead), Lorraine Slee

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Francis Gonzalez, Lorraine Slee

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    IG6 1PU

  • Name on report verified

    Redbridge Alternative Provision

  • URN verified

    134366

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivehigh expectationstrusting relationshipsstrong relationshipsstrongnurturingeffectivelyconfident
Criticismconcernsnot good enoughnot consistentlylacksnot confidentabsencenot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1075w+25
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve28w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,078
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Redbridge Alternative Provision Starch House Lane, Fullwell Cross, Barkingside, Ilford, Essex, IG6 1PU

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires Improvement

The quality of education Requires Improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires Improvement Personal development Requires Improvement Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding 13 and 14 March 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils appreciate the positive working relationships that they have with adults in this school. This helps them to feel secure.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have appropriate aspirations about what pupils can achieve in a range of subjects the meet their needs and aspirations. However, pupils do not make the progress that they should in some subjects. This is because the curriculum lacks clarity about what pupils should learn.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Parents and carers express satisfaction with the school and see it as playing an important role in helping their child return to mainstream education. Most told inspectors that they did not mind that there was little focus on the curriculum because they did not believe this should be a priority for the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), benefit from a wide range of extra-curricular activities, including many trips to places outside of school. At lunchtimes, pupils across different year groups mix well together, either playing football or attending various enrichment activities each Friday afternoon.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Although pupils say that bullying occasionally happens, they are clear that staff respond quickly to any concerns that they raise. Pupils told inspectors that the staff care deeply about them and develop trusting relationships.

p.2

better?

There has been a significant amount of turbulence in recent years among leadership and teaching staff. As a consequence of these changes, the leadership team has rightly focused on settling the staff and pupils, and building strong relationships.

p.2

better?

The school’s aim is to help pupils succeed and go back to mainstream education. Staff have high standards for what pupils, including those with SEND, can accomplish. However, the curriculum needs to improve to fully support this goal. The quality of education is not good enough for some pupils, because the curriculum planning is not consistent. In English, pupils read many different texts in various formats, genres, and styles. Appropriate support is in place for pupils who are less confident with reading. However, the curriculum for English and other subjects is not arranged in a logical way. Leaders know that this work is important and are now giving this priority.

p.2

better?

Teachers know pupils well, including pupils with SEND. They identify the additional needs of pupils quickly and accurately. Teachers have high expectations of what pupils with can achieve.

p.2

better?

While teachers’ subject knowledge is generally strong, there is an unevenness in how well the curriculum is delivered. In some cases, teachers do not choose the 13 and 14 March 2024

p.2

3

most appropriate methods to help pupils to learn and build their knowledge. Sometimes, the activities that teachers design do not help pupils to remember important information as well as they should.

p.3

3

In some lessons, pupils’ behaviour interrupts learning. Pupils said that this was typical of their experience in school. This is because the school does not have a consistently applied behaviour policy. Leaders know that they need to do a lot of work in this area and have begun to promote a more reflective approach to dealing with incidents. Parents, however, are positive about the nurturing nature of the school.

p.3

3

Leaders and staff support most aspects of pupils’ personal development well. Pupils learn about the importance of the fundamental British values. They understand and respect the different opinions and beliefs that others may hold. Pupils know how to look after themselves when under stress or if they are sad. They are taught to understand the negative impact of discriminatory language. The school acknowledges that the careers and the vocational offer is another area that has been neglected and are taking steps to improve this.

p.3

3

Pupils, including those with SEND, benefit from a wide range of extra-curricular activities, including many trips to places outside of school. At lunchtimes, pupils across different year groups mix well together, either playing football or attending various enrichment activities each Friday afternoon.

p.3

3

The school has appropriate processes in place for tackling any concerns about pupils’ attendance. The school knows its pupils and families well. This information is used effectively to understand and address the underlying causes of individual absences. Consequently, even pupils who had high levels of absence in previous school, regularly attend because they feel valued and safe.

p.3

3

Most staff said that leaders are mindful of their workload. Staff are confident in leaders’ ability to improve the school. The school is fully aware of the steps they need to take to improve the school. Consequently, the leadership team has been strengthened to ensure that the necessary changes can be made with the required urgency.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 There is variability in how well the curriculum is designed and implemented between subjects. Subject leaders have not given sufficient thought as to what important knowledge pupils need to know and remember in their subjects. This means that pupils find it hard to recall previous learning. Leaders should ensure 13 and 14 March 2024

p.3

4

that the curriculum is well structured to support pupils to build and embed important knowledge in their long-term memory.  The school’s expectations for behaviour are not implemented consistently. In some lessons, pupils’ learning is disrupted by the behaviour of others. Leaders must check that all staff are consistent in their expectations and application of the systems for managing behaviour.  The school does not provide pupils with opportunities to learn about the full range of education and training options open to them. As a result, pupils cannot make fully informed choices about their future. The school should ensure that pupils have relevant guidance about future career pathways.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 13 and 14 March 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date(s) of previous inspection 4 December 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the last inspection there has been a series of interim and substantive leaders appointed.  The school provides support for pupils who have been, or who are at risk of, permanent exclusion from mainstream schools.  The school has sperate provision for up to 65 Year 11 pupils who are new to the country, many of whom arrived unaccompanied.  The school does not make use of any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. They deemed the inspection a graded (section 5) inspection under the same Act.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 13 and 14 March 2024

p.5

6

 During the inspection, inspectors held discussions with the headteacher and other leaders, including curriculum and pastoral leaders.  Inspectors held discussions with teachers, teaching assistants and governors.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, personal, social and health education, and science. For each of these subjects, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with members of staff individually and in groups and spoke to pupils at various points during the inspection. Inspectors took account of responses to pupil, parent and staff surveys.  Inspectors looked at records relating to behaviour, bullying, attendance, and safeguarding.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector/inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils;

p.6

6

and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

Inspection team

Francis Gonzalez, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Lorraine Slee Ofsted Inspector 13 and 14 March 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion