Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in Bexley
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Jan 2024
- Inspectors verified
Kate Daurge
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
115561
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder fails to assess and respond to the needs of individual children in her care, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). p.2
- The childminder has a poor understanding of how to support children to regulate their behaviour. p.2
- The childminders curriculum is poorly implemented. p.2
- Some children demonstrate persistently poor self-control and respect for others. p.2
- The childminder's settling-in arrangements are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health5
“Children's well-being is compromised.” p.2Parents & families4
“Parents share positive feedback regarding the care of their children.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 798
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder has a poor understanding of how to keep children safe. She does not adequately supervise children. The childminder's risk assessment is not robust enough to identify and minimise any risks to children's safety. This has a negative impact on children's safety and well-being.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder understands that children need to access a range of activities to develop their knowledge and skills. However, she does not create an environment that promotes an enjoyable experience for all children. Her home is often noisy and chaotic which does not support children's learning. The childminder fails to assess and respond to the needs of individual children in her care, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The childminder does not give children enough individual attention. Her brief interactions with children do not enable them to extend their learning. Children are not able to access an ambitious curriculum. They do not develop positive attitudes to learning.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder has a poor understanding of how to support children to regulate their behaviour. For example, she does not teach children to use gentle hands or step in when children hurt each other. This impacts on children's ability to feel emotionally and physically secure. Not all children are able to feel happy and safe in the childminder's care.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder does not assess and respond to the needs of individual children. For example, babies miss their nap times because the childminder is unable to provide a calm environment for them to sleep. As a result, she cannot provide adequate care and education for all children. Children's well-being is compromised. n The childminder's procedures for checking all areas of the home are not robust. For example, although the childminder has recently put child safe locks on her kitchen drawers, these are not always closed. Children are often out of sight of the childminder for extended periods. This includes when children are in the kitchen where tools and equipment pose a risk to children. This compromises children's safety. n The childminder does not implement robust procedures for contact between children and the family pets. She allows her dogs to be in the learning environment while young children are present. The childminder's poor lack of
p.2
need to do better?
child supervision means that children are not always within her sight. This puts children at risk of harm. n The childminders curriculum is poorly implemented. She does not adequately consider the individual needs of children when planning. For example, babies are
p.2
need to do better?
24 January 2024 often left without activities to play with. Older children do not receive the attention they need from the childminder to complete tasks or feel successful. The childminder does not adapt her teaching to meet the needs of children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Not all children have an enjoyable experience in her home and make good progress. n The childminder understands that interactions with children are important for their communication and language development. However, her interactions with children are limited. For example, the childminder often completes other tasks while the children are playing. Children's opportunities to develop their fluency are limited. n The childminder does not demonstrate an ability to effectively manage children's behaviour. Some children demonstrate persistently poor self-control and respect for others. This leads to other children not feeling safe and secure.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder's settling-in arrangements are not effective. For example, new children transitioning into her home are not given the support they need to feel happy and safe. They often become distressed and the childminder is unable to calm them down. This does not support children's emotional well-being. n The childminder develops close working relationships with parents. She informs parents each day of the activities that the children have done. Parents share positive feedback regarding the care of their children. n The childminder plans opportunities for children to explore their local community. For example, she takes children to the local playgroup and allotment to engage in different activities. Children learn about how things work as they explore their local surroundings.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
ensure that the individual needs of children are identified and met, so that children feel safe and secure 01/02/2024
p.3
Due date
implement effective risk assessments to identify and minimise risks to children's safety 01/02/2024
p.3
Due date
24 January 2024 supervise children effectively to keep them safe 15/02/2024
p.3
Due date
interact positively with children to help support their communication and language development 15/02/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure that all children are supported to manage their behaviour effectively 15/02/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure that the settling-in arrangements are effective to support children's emotional wellbeing and help smooth transition 15/02/2024
p.4
Due date
implement an effective curriculum that meets all children's needs, so that all children including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) make good progress in their learning and development. 25/04/2024
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 115561 Local authority Bexley Inspection number 10316968 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6 Date of previous inspection 23 May 2018
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 1999. She lives in the Bexley area of Kent. She operates all year round, Monday to Friday, except bank holidays. Her opening hours are Monday to Friday from 7.30am to 5.30pm. The childminder holds a relevant early years qualification at level 3. The childminder receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The childminder showed the inspector the premises and discussed children's safety. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their EYFS curriculum. n The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder and children. n Some parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The childminder and inspector discussed how the curriculum had been implemented and the impact that this had on children's learning. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.
p.5
Inspection activities
24 January 2024 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
24 January 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion