Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Thurston Community College

Inspected 6 Mar 2024 · published 25 Apr 2024 · URN 124802

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dave Gibson (lead), Carol Dallas, Dan Leonard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Carol Dallas, Dan Leonard, Dave Gibson

  • Postcode verified

    IP31 3PB

  • Name on report verified

    Thurston Community College

  • URN verified

    124802

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh-qualityhigh expectationsenjoyengagingeffectivelyconsistentlywell plannedwell behaved
Criticismstrugglenot alwaysworryinggapscompromisedseriouslacksnot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1196w+7
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,205
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Thurston Community College Norton Road, Thurston, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP31 3PB

p.1

Outcome

Thurston Community College continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils benefit from the high aspiration reflected in the school’s curriculum. They secure and retain important knowledge and produce high-quality work. However, for a small minority of younger pupils, this ambition is not always realised in their lessons. Some pupils struggle to remember what they have been taught.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

There are a very small number of pupils who struggle to meet the school’s high expectations of conduct. This causes interruption to some lessons. This frustrates other pupils who are well behaved, polite and respectful. Pupils have confidence in adults to help them if they need it. They feel safe in school. However, sometimes it takes too long for pupils to find out how the school has addressed the issue that is worrying them. This causes some pupils increased levels of anxiety while they wait for information.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Students in the sixth form enjoy high-quality learning experiences. They value the support provided by both pastoral and academic staff. Students value the independence that studying in a positive, calm college atmosphere creates. However, sixth-form students are not routinely part of the main school life. This results in opportunities being missed to enrich experiences for pupils and sixth-form students alike.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has given careful thought to what pupils need to know. It has precisely defined what knowledge should be taught and in what order. This supports pupils to learn and then apply important information to different situations. The curriclum design enables all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), to achieve success.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Reading is integrated within the curriculum. Pupils access a broad range of engaging texts. They read widely across all subjects. The support for pupils who struggle with reading helps them keep up effectively. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.1

2

Curriculum plans are generally transformed into engaging and well-thought-out learning experiences. Complex ideas are clearly and precisely explained in small, easy-to-digest pieces. Teachers use well-crafted examples to link these pieces together. They model clearly how pupils should construct their responses.

p.2

2

In most cases, teachers check carefully what pupils know. They spot gaps and identify misconceptions. When these are fixed quickly, pupils move on to successfully complete learning activities. However, in some cases, this checking lacks the same level of finesse and precision. Consequently, sometimes teachers are not fully aware of what pupils know and understand. They cannot adapt their teaching to meet individuals’ needs, including for pupils with SEND. In these cases, gaps remain, and misconceptions continue. As a result, some pupils find it difficult to accurately recall important information.

p.2

2

The school has provided teachers with key information to support pupils with SEND. Strategies guide teachers to help pupils overcome individual barriers to learning. When enacted, these help pupils with SEND make similar rates of progress to their peers.

p.2

2

Expert teaching helps sixth-form students understand complex, often abstract, ideas. The work set by teachers is demanding. Expectations are high and students respond well. The curriculum content ensures students build on what they know, extending and deepening their knowledge.

p.2

2

The school has set high standards for how it expects pupils to behave. It has communicated these to all staff and pupils. However, the systems in place to manage pupils’ behaviour are not consistently applied. Some teachers allow certain behaviours that others do not. This makes it difficult for some pupils to understand how to meet the expected standards. Many lessons progress without disruption. However, some pupils get frustrated by this inconsistent approach and the impact it has on their learning.

p.2

2

The personal, social, health and economics programme is well planned. Pupils develop an age-appropriate understanding of important concepts, such as how to form a healthy relationship. Pupils also learn important information about careers. Pupils enjoy access to a range of educational providers, employers and other organisations. This provides pupils with the information they need to make informed choices. However, information about how individual subjects relate to specific careers is less extensive. The school provides many opportunities for pupils to participate in sport, the arts and general interest clubs. Pupils respect this offer.

p.2

2

Some staff feel that the impact of procedural or system changes on their workload has not always been considered. However, they recognise that recent changes to the leadership of the school have made this issue much better. The majority of staff are proud to work at the school.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Staff do not apply the school’s policy to manage pupils’ behaviour consistently. This means that some pupils struggle to understand what is expected of them and to meet the school’s high standards. The school should ensure that all staff understand what is expected, are trained to deliver the agreed policies and then enact them consistently at all times.  Not all teachers use assessment effectively. This means they do not have the information they need to adapt their teaching and move pupils on when they are ready. Pupils’ learning is compromised. The school should ensure that all teachers use assessment strategies well and use this information to adapt their approaches to meet the needs of all pupils.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in March 2018.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 5 and 6 March 2024

p.4

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,501

p.5

form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

form

Dates of previous inspection 22 and 23 March 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The interim principal took up her post in January 2024.  The school is currently working in partnership with a local trust: Penrose Learning Trust.  The school operates across two campuses. Years 7 to 11 are based on the Thurston Campus, with sixth-form provision based on the Beyton Campus.  The school uses four registered and two unregistered alternative providers.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with leaders, including the principal and vice-principals. The lead inspector also met with governors and a representative from the local authority.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, history and art. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to staff, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To further inspect the curriculum, the lead inspector reviewed curriculum documentation for physical education and modern foreign languages.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The lead inspector reviewed a wide range of documents, including school development plans, and policies and documentation for behaviour and attendance.  To gather pupils’ views, inspectors spent time observing and speaking to pupils. The lead inspector reviewed the 272 responses to the pupil survey.  Inspectors spoke with several staff and reviewed the 95 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.  To gather parents’ views, inspectors reviewed the 280 responses and 197 free-text responses submitted to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View.

p.6

Inspection team

Dave Gibson, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Dan Leonard Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 March 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion