Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by ABC Care and Education Ltd in Lancaster
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
ABC Care and Education Ltd
- Inspection date verified
21 Feb 2024
- Inspectors verified
Andrea Foreman
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Name on report verified
SC443765
- URN verified
SC443765
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There is a strong relationship with school staff, with effective daily communication. p.3
- This is reflective of the positive and trusting relationships between children and staff. p.3
- Staff maintain effective communication with children’s families to ensure that they spend time with them and build positive relationships with the people who are important to them. p.3
- Staff provided support to the child in a caring and respectful way. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person may only use devices for the monitoring or surveillance of children if— p.5
- In particular, sensors should only be used in the home where there is an identified safeguarding concern for children. p.5
- The use of sensors should be reviewed and children should be informed of the reason for their use. 31 March 2024 p.5
- The registered person should ensure that impact risk assessments completed when considering a new placement for the home take into account the potential impact of risks for the children already living in the home and not just the known risks for the child being considered. p.5
- The registered person should ensure that they carry out reviews of significant incidents to understand opportunities to improve practice and outcomes for children. p.5
- The registered person should ensure that visits to the home by the independent person are robust, with opportunities to talk with children, their parents, their relatives and people working at the home. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language3
“There is a strong relationship with school staff, with effective daily communication.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,300
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: SC443765 1 SC443765 Registered provider: ABC Care and Education Ltd Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This is a privately operated children’s home. The home is registered to provide care for up to three children with social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager registered with Ofsted in June 2018 and is appropriately qualified.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of this inspection, there were three children living in the home.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 18 January 2023
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: SC443765 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
18/01/2023 Full Good 01/12/2021 Full Good 16/10/2019 Full Requires improvement to be good 10/01/2019 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: SC443765 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are happy and settled in the home. The environment is warm, welcoming, and personalised for the children who live there. Care is individualised to meet children’s needs with attention to understanding their behaviours and experiences.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The care provided to children is nurturing and is strengthened with the input of child-led therapeutic support. Staff come up with creative ways for children to express themselves, which supports their emotional and physical well-being. There are numerous ways for children to share their views and feelings, which demonstrates that their opinions are valued and acted on by staff.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are making good progress, but particularly with their educational and health needs. There is a strong relationship with school staff, with effective daily communication. This means children receive consistent care and support at home and at school, and any areas of concern are addressed quickly.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children have opportunities to try out activities, both individually and as a group, to develop their social skills and confidence. Children experienced a summer holiday together with staff, giving them shared memories.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are supported to understand their longer-term plans. Staff maintain effective communication with children’s families to ensure that they spend time with them and build positive relationships with the people who are important to them. This helps children to build support networks, which will benefit them as they become more independent.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children feel safe in the home. The use of physical intervention is rare, and children rarely go missing from the home. This is reflective of the positive and trusting relationships between children and staff.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The risks for an older child previously living in the home were well managed. However, an isolated incident escalated, which led to the child’s placement ending. Staff provided support to the child in a caring and respectful way. The manager’s decision to end the placement was made with a clear rationale and judgement to safeguard the child, other children in the home and staff.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The child’s experience of leaving the home was compromised due to safeguarding concerns with no opportunities for them to say goodbye to the other children and staff. The children remaining in the home received age-appropriate explanations and support to minimise the impact of the incident and the child’s unplanned move from the home on them. Inspection report for children’s home: SC443765 4 Staff are consistent in their approach to supporting children with their behaviours and use creative incentives to encourage children to make progress in relation to their behaviour. There are clear and consistent rules and boundaries in place for children that staff and children understand. Staff work with children to help them to reflect on their behaviours, meaning that consequences are rarely used.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Sensors are used in some areas of the home, including the hallways and landings, without a clear rationale for their use that is linked to safeguarding children. Children’s plans do not set out the need for these measures, and their use is not subject to ongoing review or consultation. Children’s understanding from the explanations given by staff, about the use of and need for the sensors, is not appropriate and could lead them to become dependent on the measure.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Consideration is given to the potential risks new children may pose to the children already living in the home. However, consideration is not given to the impact of any known risks to new children from those already living there. This does not demonstrate that assessments for children moving into the home are robust and ensure that all risks are considered.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager is passionate about the care provided to children and leads her team by example. There is a stable team of staff who are supportive of each other and feel supported in their roles. Professionals and family members are complimentary about the work of the manager and the team in terms of how responsive they are and how well they advocate for children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager has a clear understanding of the progress children are making and how the staff contribute towards reaching the best outcomes for children. There is effective and proactive work with professionals, particularly with schools and therapists, to ensure consistency and certainty for children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff supervision and team meetings are held regularly. The content of sessions is child-focused and reflective, with the aim of maintaining consistent practice across the team. The staff team is well trained. The manager has sought additional online training through a specialist agency to ensure that one child’s health needs are met effectively. This training has been shared with the child’s school, which demonstrates effective partnership working that is in the child’s best interests.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager has good oversight of the home and is keen to ensure that any new staff appointments are a good fit for the team and for the children. The manager works with the independent person to consider potential improvements to the home. However, the independent persons monthly reports often lack valuable feedback from children, staff and family members, which is not robustly challenged by the manager. There have been missed opportunities for the manager to carry out more in-depth reviews of significant incidents in the home to improve practice. Inspection report for children’s home: SC443765 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered person may only use devices for the monitoring or surveillance of children if—
p.5
Requirement Due date
the monitoring or surveillance is for the purpose of safeguarding and promoting the welfare of the child concerned, or other children;
p.5
Requirement Due date
the child’s placing authority consents in writing to the monitoring or surveillance;
p.5
Requirement Due date
so far as reasonably practicable in the light of the child’s age and understanding, the child is informed in advance of the intention to do the monitoring or surveillance; and
p.5
Requirement Due date
the monitoring or surveillance is no more intrusive than necessary, having regard to the child’s need for privacy. (Regulation 24 (1)(a)(b)(c)(d))
p.5
Requirement Due date
In particular, sensors should only be used in the home where there is an identified safeguarding concern for children. The use of sensors should be reviewed and children should be informed of the reason for their use. 31 March 2024
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that impact risk assessments completed when considering a new placement for the home take into account the potential impact of risks for the children already living in the home and not just the known risks for the child being considered. (‘Guide to the Children’s Home Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 42, paragraph 9.5)
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that they carry out reviews of significant incidents to understand opportunities to improve practice and outcomes for children. Children and staff should also be given feedback about the outcome of manager reviews, where appropriate, to show how their experiences have been Inspection report for children’s home: SC443765 6 taken into consideration. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 55, paragraph 10.24)
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that visits to the home by the independent person are robust, with opportunities to talk with children, their parents, their relatives and people working at the home. (‘Guide to the Children’s Home Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 65, paragraph 15.5)
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: SC443765 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: ABC Care and Education Ltd
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: International House, 61 Mosley Street, Manchester M2 3HZ
p.7
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Christopher Kennedy
p.7
Inspector
Andrea Foreman, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: SC443765 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion