Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Peterchurch Primary School

Inspected 6 Mar 2024 · published 18 Apr 2024 · URN 116718

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Liz Vautier-Thomas, Martin Pye

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HR2 0RP

  • Name on report verified

    Peterchurch Primary School

  • URN verified

    116718

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivemake good progressexceptionalwell ledambitiousimprovedenjoysupportive
Criticismnot alwaysnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1043w+79
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,018
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection of Peterchurch Primary School Peterchurch, Hereford, Herefordshire HR2 0RP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 5 and 6 March 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This school has improved a lot. It is well led and provides pupils with many positive experiences. Lessons are well organised and expectations are high. Consequently, pupils make good progress in their learning and enjoy their time at school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Beyond the classroom, there are plenty of other things to do. From after-school gardening and dance clubs to coastal trips, book festivals and more, the school does much to broaden pupils’ interests. On top of this, the school has strengthened links with the local community. Pupils get a good grounding in what it means to make a positive contribution to society. A supportive, positive and ambitious culture flavours learning and school life.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Behaviour is typically very good and lessons run smoothly. Pupils are well mannered and quick to show initiative. They know what the school’s values, including respect, empathy and responsibility, mean in practice. They also value the praise and rewards that they get from staff when they do something well. Bullying hardly ever happens and any upsets or disagreements are sorted out calmly and fairly. The school is a safe and happy place to be.

p.2

better?

Since the previous inspection, new leadership has brought fresh energy and direction to the school. The significant impact of this is evident in many ways.

p.2

better?

The curriculum has been redesigned and class organisation has been reviewed to provide greater consistency. Staff have clear guidance to follow so they know what to teach and when. This means that the right things get taught and lessons build logically on earlier learning. These changes have been supported by appropriate staff training. In addition, subject leaders have dedicated time to checking how well the curriculum is working. Staff, pupils and parents express positive views about the school’s warm culture and ethos. Indeed, there is united agreement from staff that leaders support them to do their jobs well and are equally mindful of their workload and welfare.

p.2

better?

The school has a structured and systematic approach to teaching early reading. In Reception and key stage 1, phonics lessons happen every day. The books that pupils read and take home are well matched to the sounds they need to practise. If anyone needs extra help, then the school provides additional reading sessions. In addition, good communication with families enables parents to support the school’s approach at home. This helps all pupils to make good progress. Spelling and handwriting are taught alongside reading, although there is still scope to strengthen aspects of the school’s work in these areas.

p.2

better?

The curriculum in other subjects is mapped out in line with the content and ambitions of the national curriculum. Work and activities in Reception get children into good learning habits and routines. Beyond this, leaders have thought carefully 5 and 6 March 2024

p.2

3

about how to manage learning in different subjects in mixed-age classes. By and large, they have done this well. However, the implementation of the curriculum is further ahead in some subjects than others. The school has also considered how to use assessment to inform everyday teaching. In science, for example, teaching involves careful questioning to check on any misconceptions pupils might have. This helps to check on what pupils know and informs what teachers do next. This use of assessment as an integral part of lessons is now developing in others subjects too.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities receive informed support. Their needs are identified accurately and teaching and resources are adapted appropriately. In their comments to inspectors, several parents praised the school’s inclusive approach and attention to their children’s particular needs. Inspection evidence supports these views.

p.3

3

The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development is a distinctive strength. Some aspects, such as attention to pupils’ moral development, are exceptional. Pupils take on leadership roles in school. They help with decision-making and show thoughtful consideration towards others. Extra activities such as clubs, outdoor learning and trips are planned with deliberate thought about the purpose and benefits to all. The school’s involvement with the local community is also worthy of note. An annual parade and performances, for example, are joyous celebrations that unite young and old. These, and many other activities, prompt pupils to try new things, take responsibility and build self-esteem.

p.3

3

Governors have made informed decisions that support school improvement. They also have reliable systems in place to check on the school’s work, and to ensure compliance with the law.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The implementation of the curriculum, and staff training, are further ahead in some foundation subjects than in others. This means there is still some unevenness in the quality of learning across different subjects. The school should continue to support staff with well-targeted guidance and training so that the quality of learning in all subjects continues to improve.  The school’s approach to teaching handwriting is not as consistent as other aspects of English. This means that pupils do not always get into good habits that endure, so their handwriting is not as good as it could be. The school should review and improve the approach to teaching handwriting so that pupils’ handwriting improves across the school. 5 and 6 March 2024

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 5 and 6 March 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 16 March 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school provides before and after-school childcare on the school site.  The school does not use any alternative provision.  There is a privately run nursery located in a separate building in the school’s grounds. This is subject to a separate inspection at a different time.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the second routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspectors considered published performance data about the school. Inspectors also looked at a range of school documents. These included 5 and 6 March 2024

p.5

6

information about pupils’ behaviour, attendance, the curriculum, extra-curricular activities, governance, school improvement planning and documents published on the school’s website.  During the inspection, the inspectors had formal meetings with the headteacher, other leaders, school staff, pupils and governors. The lead inspector spoke on the telephone with the school’s improvement partner.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in the following subjects: reading, mathematics, science and computing. In these subjects, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and considered pupils’ work. They also considered the curriculum in other subjects to check how they were organised, taught and assessed. An inspector observed some pupils reading to staff.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single

p.6

6

central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors talked informally with pupils, parents and staff to gather general information about school life. They took account of the responses to Ofsted’s surveys of staff, pupils’ and parents’ views.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in class, in assembly, at clubs, at lunchtime, on the playground and at other times during the day.

p.6

Inspection team

Martin Pye, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Liz Vautier-Thomas Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 March 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion