Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Cherry Oak School

Inspected 6 Mar 2024 · published 18 Apr 2024 · URN 103626

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Mar 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Anna Vrahimi, Pete Hines OBE

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    B29 6PB

  • Name on report verified

    Cherry Oak School

  • URN verified

    103626

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2020.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivehighly effectivesuccessfullyeffectivelyambitiousenjoyhappy
Criticismnot alwaysinconsistenciesnot yetconcernsnot precisenot successfullynot well supported

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1212w+21
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,185
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
22%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of Cherry Oak School 60 Frederick Road, Selly Oak, Birmingham, West Midlands B29 6PB

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 5 and 6 March 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Since the last inspection, there have been many improvements at Cherry Oak School. Pupils now receive a good quality of education. Pupils enjoy their learning and are happy at school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Relationships are important here. From the very start in the early years, the school takes time to support children, families and carers with this important transition. These positive relationships continue throughout school. This means that staff know their pupils and families well. Most staff act quickly to support pupils when they become anxious and need help with their emotions. Consequently, pupils are calm across school most of the time.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ safety in and out of school is top priority. All staff understand the additional vulnerabilities pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have. Pupils are taught how to communicate when they need help. All staff demonstrate the school’s motto of ‘never do nothing’ effectively. This means that staff are highly vigilant. All concerns, such as changes in pupils’ behaviours, are acted upon quickly.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff model the school’s values of respect, inspire, support and empower to pupils. In turn, pupils demonstrate these values well. For example, pupils encourage each other to be the very best they can be during sports tournaments. All this helps pupils to be confident and motivating individuals.

p.2

better?

The school and federation have driven forward improvements since the last inspection so that pupils now receive a good quality of education. As part of these improvements, there have been several positive changes to leadership. These include governors taking appropriate action to stabilise the leadership of the school.

p.2

better?

The school has created a carefully planned curriculum across all subject areas. The knowledge and skills that leaders want pupils to learn are planned to build in a logical order over time. However, in a few areas, the learning pupils are expected to know and remember is not explicitly defined. This means that the content pupils learn does not always build appropriately on what they have learned before. This slows pupils’ learning.

p.2

better?

A pathway model helps pupils to learn the curriculum alongside pupils with similar needs. These pathways are ambitious. Systems for assessing pupils’ learning across subjects and pathways are effective. Consequently, leaders know how well pupils are learning the intended curriculum.

p.2

better?

Leaders are determined to give all pupils a voice to communicate, especially pupils who do not yet use verbal language. All pupils have an education, health and care (EHC) plan. These plans mostly support pupils’ speech, language, communication and interaction needs, including autism spectrum condition. The school uses a range 5 and 6 March 2024

p.2

3

of strategies to support pupils to communicate, such as symbols, objects of reference and signing. The most effective strategies to meet pupils’ individual communication, sensory and behavioural needs are quickly established when pupils join the school. However, for some pupils these strategies are not always precise or detailed enough. They are not always reviewed in a timely manner. This is also reflected in some classroom environments. In a few areas of the school there are inconsistencies in how the classroom environment is maintained and used to support pupils’ specific areas of need. This means that some pupils are not accessing their learning as well as they could be.

p.3

3

An established phonics programme is in place across school. Staff are experts at teaching pupils to read. Pupils not yet ready for the formal phonics programme are supported daily by experienced staff. They share books, identify sounds and help pupils to build their attention during lessons. Consequently, highly effective systems are in place to help pupils to read and develop a love of books.

p.3

3

Pupils access a wealth of wider experiences. They visit their local supermarket and learn how to handle money. Pupils successfully participate and win local sports competitions against other specialist provisions. Pupils visit different places of worship. Older pupils experience a residential visit. For most pupils, this is their first time away from home. Pupils on the school council make important decisions, such as changes to their school dinner menu. All these experiences help to develop pupils’ confidence and their understanding of the wider world.

p.3

3

Leaders and governors know how important attendance is to pupils’ education. Although attendance is improving, there remains a group of pupils who are not attending school regularly enough. Leaders and the school’s family support team have clear attendance strategies in place to support these pupils and their families. These strategies are working well and are having a positive impact on pupils’ attendance.

p.3

3

Governors fulfil their statutory duties effectively. They offer appropriate support and challenge to the school. Staff are supportive of the many positive changes to the school in recent years. Leaders and governors have been successful in securing positive changes to pupils’ educational experiences.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In a few parts of the curriculum, the subject knowledge that leaders want pupils to learn is not explicit enough. This means that the content pupils learn does not always build appropriately on what they have learned before. This slows pupils’ learning. The school should ensure that the explicit subject knowledge is 5 and 6 March 2024

p.3

4

identified in these parts of the curriculum so that pupils can always build on their prior knowledge accurately and successfully.  For some pupils, the strategies planned to meet their specific areas of need are not always precise and detailed enough. In addition, these are not always reviewed in a systematic and timely manner. This means that, at times, some pupils are not accessing their learning successfully enough. The school should ensure the strategies planned to meet the needs of pupils are always accurate and reviewed systematically so that all pupils can achieve successfully to their full potential.  For some pupils, there are inconsistencies in how the classroom environment is maintained and used to support their specific areas of need, such as their communication, behaviour and sensory needs. As a result, some pupils are not as well supported as they could be. The school should ensure that the classroom

p.4

4

environment is always maintained to a high and consistent standard and fully supports the specific areas of need for pupils.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 5 and 6 March 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Headteacher Gary Coffey (Executive headteacher)

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 11 and 12 February 2020, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the last inspection, there have been several changes to leadership. A new headteacher was appointed and then left in December 2023. The substantive deputy headteacher was then promoted from within the school as the interim head of school in January 2024. An interim assistant headteacher was also promoted from within the school in January 2024. A new executive headteacher was appointed in September 2021.  The school is part of The Federation of Cherry Oak School and Victoria School. There are two schools and one college within the federation. The two schools share the same governing body.  All pupils have an EHC plan. These mostly support needs associated with speech, language, communication, interaction, sensory and autism spectrum condition. Pupils also have medical and severe learning needs.  There were no nursery-age pupils on roll during this inspection.  The school does not make use of any alternative providers.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

◼ Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. ◼ This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. ◼ The inspectors met with the executive headteacher, interim head of school, interim assistant headteacher, chair of governors, additional representatives from the governing board, subject coordinators, teachers and pupils. They also talked informally with transport escorts, drivers and staff. ◼ The lead inspector spoke with a school improvement adviser. ◼ Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, communication, mathematics, physical education and sensory integration. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers,

p.6

Information about this inspection

spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors also looked at additional subjects, including humanities and art and design. ◼ The lead inspector observed pupils reading to a familiar adult. ◼ To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. ◼ Inspectors considered responses to the online questionnaire for parents, Ofsted Parent View. This included free-text comments. Inspectors also looked at responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey. ◼ Inspectors looked at a range of documents provided by the school, including the school’s self-evaluation, school policies, curriculum documents and SEND records.

p.6

Inspection team

Anna Vrahimi, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Pete Hines OBE Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 March 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion