Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2024

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gwen Onyon (lead), Claire Price

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Claire Price, Gwen Onyon

  • Postcode verified

    CV7 9AH

  • Name on report verified

    Ash Green School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 31

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh expectationsrespectfulconsistentlypoliteimprovedrobustconfidentpositive
Criticismseriousweaknessesweaknesssuspensionsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings241w−67
  • What needs to improve605w+30

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
846
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 28%What needs to improve 72%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Fuzel Choudhury Principal Ash Green School Ash Green Lane Ash Green Coventry West Midlands CV7 9AH

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ash Green School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 31 January 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in December 2022.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ash Green School

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ash Green School

During the inspection, Gwen Onyon, Ofsted Inspector (OI), Julie McBrearty, OI and I discussed with you and other senior and middle leaders, the director of performance and the director of quality assurance of the trust, other trust leaders and the chair of the trust the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also visited lessons, reviewed safeguarding records, reviewed some of the school’s analysis, spoke to pupils and observed social times. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to be no longer judged as having serious weaknesses.

p.1

designation

You took up your post in January 2023, following the previous inspection. Since then, you have worked with the trust to add capacity to the leadership of the school. You have also made some key appointments, such as to the attendance team.

p.2

designation

Since your appointment, you have quickly set out to improve pupils’ experiences of school. You have simplified the behaviour management system to make sure that all pupils, staff and parents are clear about your high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. Staff have been trained well to manage behaviour and, as a result, behaviour is managed more consistently across the school. Most pupils behave well in lessons. They are respectful and polite. The school is now well ordered and calm. Although you have reduced the numbers of suspensions, many pupils are still experiencing sanctions such as suspensions or spending periods of time in the ‘reflection room’. This is limiting their access to a well- taught curriculum. Continuing your well-considered work on behaviour should remain a priority for the school.

p.2

designation

The school, supported by the trust, has invested heavily in improving attendance. You have introduced an ‘attendance improvement team’, which follows up attendance tenaciously. You have introduced a comprehensive range of strategies to improve attendance, making sure that pupils get the support they need to attend school and recognising those pupils who attend school often. This good work has improved attendance for nearly all groups of pupils. However, the school’s attendance remains well below national averages. Pupils who are disadvantaged and those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities attend school less frequently than their peers. Leaders know there is more work to do to make sure that attendance in the school continues to improve.

p.2

designation

You have put in place robust strategies to tackle incidents of discriminatory behaviour. Pupils are being taught about the importance of behaving respectfully towards others in personal, social and health education, in assembly and during the tutor time ‘accept and respect’ programme. Staff tackle discriminatory behaviour as soon as it occurs, ‘stopping the clock’ in lessons to explain why behaviours that have been seen are not acceptable. Most pupils are understanding of these concepts. Other pupils, who need additional support to behave in this respectful way, take part in individual interventions. Generally, pupils now know that the school does not tolerate any forms of discrimination, and they feel confident that adults will take action if it occurs.

p.2

designation

The school and the trust are working together to tackle the areas of weakness in the school. Trust leaders hold you to account for the actions you are taking to make sure that you make the improvements you intend. You have taken decisive action to ensure that all pupils get the education you want them to experience, and this has led to palpable improvements in the school. However, at times, leaders have an overly positive view of the school’s performance, focusing on the improvements made, rather than how near the school is to meeting leaders’ ambitions for all pupils. You have developed a culture of aspiration and respect in the school. Pupils know they are expected to work hard and behave well, and most do so. Staff feel well supported to meet your ambitions. They are rightly proud of the progress the school is making.

p.2

designation

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the CEO or equivalent of the Creative Education Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Warwickshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion