Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in North Somerset
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Feb 2024
- Inspectors verified
Victoria Nicolson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
118248
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Despite previous concerns raised about the lack of support for children's communication and language development, this continues to be an area of weakness. p.2
- improve understanding of child protection procedures, including how to identify when a child is at risk of harm and when to report concerns or allegations. 13/03/2024 p.3
- The childminder does not do enough to address breaches of requirements that have been raised at previous inspections. p.2
- In addition, the childminder's understanding of child protection is weak. p.2
- Furthermore, her interactions with children are weak and p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- She does not know when she should report concerns about children's welfare which puts children's safety at risk. p.2
- For example, she does not have a good enough understanding of how to recognise when a child may be at risk and does not know the procedures she should follow to keep children safe. p.2
- Children lack the challenge and support that they need to help them to make good enough progress. p.2
- Furthermore, she does not know what she should do if an allegation was made about her or a member of her family. p.2
- provide a curriculum that focuses on what children already know and can do, and targets what they need to learn next. 27/03/2024 p.4
- Therefore, children do not receive the support that they need to keep them safe and the childminder does not offer them sufficient challenge in their learning. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment2
“Furthermore, her interactions with children are weak and” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 756
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not do enough to address breaches of requirements that have been raised at previous inspections. Although she has met some actions, she has not addressed the other weaknesses that were identified and further breaches have occurred. The childminder does not deal with weaknesses in practice promptly and effectively to raise standards. Therefore, children do not receive the support that they need to keep them safe and the childminder does not offer them sufficient challenge in their learning. Although the childminder has sought some support from other professionals since her last inspection, this has not had the desired impact. She continues to lack a clear understanding of her role and responsibilities.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Despite previous concerns raised about the lack of support for children's communication and language development, this continues to be an area of weakness. The childminder does not know how to interact and engage with children to promote their language skills further, instead she simply watches the children in silence while they play. In addition, the childminder's understanding of child protection is weak. She does not know when she should report concerns about children's welfare which puts children's safety at risk.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Despite the weaknesses in support for children's learning and development, children form secure attachments with the childminder. They are settled in the childminder's care, they know the routines and behave well.
p.2
need to do better?
n Since her last inspection, the childminder has taken some action. She has updated her paediatric first-aid training and keeps an accurate record of children's daily attendance. Despite the childminder also creating a safeguarding statement, she still does not have a good enough understanding of key aspects. For example, she does not have a good enough understanding of how to recognise when a child may be at risk and does not know the procedures she should follow to keep children safe. Furthermore, she does not know what she should do if an allegation was made about her or a member of her family. n The childminder has not made effective use of professional development opportunities to raise the quality of the service that she provides. She does not have an up-to-date knowledge and understanding of how children learn, or how to promote children's development further. This is despite similar weaknesses
p.2
need to do better?
being raised at her previous inspection. As a result, the childminder does not have a clear understanding of her roles and responsibilities. n The childminder does not do enough to support children's communication and language development. Furthermore, her interactions with children are weak and
p.2
need to do better?
27 February 2024 infrequent. When the childminder does interact with children, these occasions are not meaningful and do not benefit children. For instance, while she comments on what they are doing, she does not model language well or encourage children to develop their vocabulary. Children lack the challenge and support that they need to help them to make good enough progress. n The childminder does not provide a curriculum that offers children appropriate challenge, to help them to make progress in their learning. She aims to use children's interests to promote their learning. However, she does not understand how to implement this, as she plays alongside children and does not recognise how to extend children's learning. As a result, children lose interest and do not receive the challenge that they need. For instance, she only allows children to have access to limited resources and this sometimes hinders their opportunities
p.2
need to do better?
to extend imaginative play. Furthermore, when children hold scissors incorrectly to cut dough, she praises them and does not help them to learn how to hold them properly. n The childminder provides children with opportunities to explore the local community and mix with other children and adults. For example, she attends local groups and takes children on trips to soft-play sessions and on walks to feed the fish and ducks at a local park.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
improve understanding of child protection procedures, including how to identify when a child is at risk of harm and when to report concerns or allegations. 13/03/2024
p.3
Due date
use professional development opportunities more precisely, to improve understanding of how children learn, and to gain a better understanding of your role and responsibilities 27/03/2024
p.3
Due date
27 February 2024 improve the quality and frequency of interactions with children, with particular regard to providing support for children's communication and language development 27/03/2024
p.3
Due date
provide a curriculum that focuses on what children already know and can do, and targets what they need to learn next. 27/03/2024
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 118248 Local authority North Somerset Inspection number 10319478 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 8 Date of previous inspection 20 October 2023
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2001. She lives in Worle, North Somerset. She cares for children Monday to Friday, from 6am to 8pm, all year round.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The inspector discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their EYFS curriculum. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.
p.5
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
27 February 2024 27 February 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion