Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Birches Head Academy
Summary
Andrew Madden (lead), David Hermitt, Michael Scott, Mike Onyon, Sarah Godden
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Oct 2023
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Madden, David Hermitt, Michael Scott, Mike Onyon, Sarah Godden
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
ST2 8DD
- Name on report verified
Birches Head Academy
- URN verified
148220
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Around the school, and especially at breaktime and lunchtime, too many pupils behave in a way that leaves other pupils feeling afraid or unsafe. p.2
- However, too often the selection of activities does not build on previous learning, and checking for understanding is inconsistent. p.2
- Attendance is too low for many pupils, and leaders’ actions have not been successful in improving this. p.2
- Some pupils regularly experience unacceptable discrimination or bullying from others. p.3
- This means that too many pupils struggle to remember what they have been taught. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although safeguarding is secure, leaders are aware that they need to have a clear strategic oversight of records and actions, so that they are clear about what actions have been taken to support pupils who are at risk. p.3
- Leaders’ understanding of the effectiveness of the school is not as accurate as it needs to be. p.3
- Leaders should take all possible steps to ensure that all pupils attend school regularly. p.3
- Leaders should review their approach to behaviour management so that it leads to improvements in pupils’ behaviour, ensuring that parents are clear about how they can support the school too. p.3
- Those responsible for governance need to ensure that they offer more precise challenge, so they can hold leaders to account and address areas for improvement effectively. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families8
“In addition, some parents are unclear about the school’s expectations.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,215
- shorter than usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Birches Head Academy Birches Head Road, Hanley, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST2 8DD
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The principal of this school is Katie Dixon. The executive principal is Tom Quinn. This school is part of The Frank Field Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Tom Quinn, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Dr Chris Hampshire. 3 and 4 October 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has not ensured that pupils consistently behave with respect for adults and other pupils. Around the school, and especially at breaktime and lunchtime, too many pupils behave in a way that leaves other pupils feeling afraid or unsafe. Bullying and incidents of discrimination are too common. Some pupils do not report concerns as they consider that doing so makes little difference.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have redesigned the curriculum to ensure that it is ambitious. In lessons, pupils generally work well and focus on their learning. However, too often the selection of activities does not build on previous learning, and checking for understanding is inconsistent. This means that too many pupils struggle to remember what they have been taught. The high rates of absence also mean that pupils often do not recall important learning.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Parents’ and carers’ views of the school vary. The school has worked to engage parents. Some recognise the efforts to improve the school and are pleased with the welcome their children have had since starting. Other parents feel that leaders are not responding to their concerns, especially around the behaviour of some pupils.
p.2
better?
Pupils at Birches Head are not always supported to learn effectively. The school has ensured that the planned curriculum is suitably ambitious. However, leaders have not ensured that all teachers are supported well enough to deliver this curriculum consistently well. This means that sometimes the activities that are selected do not build on what pupils already know. Checking for pupils’ understanding is also variable. This means that at times, some pupils disengage from learning. Too often, teachers are not given the information they need about pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). When this happens, their needs are not met. This means that often, pupils with SEND do not make good progress.
p.2
better?
Leaders have worked to improve behaviour in lessons, and learning in class is generally not disrupted by poor behaviour. However, poor behaviour around the school persists. Groups of pupils experience regular discrimination and bullying, and do not have confidence in leaders’ ability to resolve this. The school’s actions to improve the behaviour of pupils who do not meet the school’s expectations has not had enough impact. Attendance is too low for many pupils, and leaders’ actions have not been successful in improving this.
p.2
better?
Leaders have ensured that there is a well-planned programme of personal, social and health education in place. Pupils are taught about tolerance and respect. However, pupils do not apply this well to how they treat each other. The school has worked to encourage pupils to take an active part in the ‘Be More’ curriculum, and some pupils could speak positively about the Frank Field Award they have received where they led activities in the school. However, many pupils do not take advantage of the opportunities provided. The school provides an ‘experience week’ where each 3 and 4 October 2023
p.2
3
year group has a range of trips, including to universities and visits with a focus on degree apprenticeships. Pupils also have suitable careers education, so they learn about future employment and the world of work.
p.3
3
When leaders introduced changes to the way in which behaviour is managed, they faced challenge from some parents. The trust is working alongside school leaders to communicate to parents about expectations and ongoing developments to improve the school.
p.3
3
Leaders’ understanding of the effectiveness of the school is not as accurate as it needs to be. Those responsible for governance do not use the information they receive to challenge and support leaders with precision, especially around behaviour and attendance and the quality of education. Nevertheless, staff appreciate the improvements that leaders are putting in place, and state that they are mindful of staff’s workload and well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Although safeguarding is secure, leaders are aware that they need to have a clear strategic oversight of records and actions, so that they are clear about what actions have been taken to support pupils who are at risk.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some pupils regularly experience unacceptable discrimination or bullying from others. They do not have confidence in leaders’ ability to address this, so they do not report it. Leaders need to ensure that all discrimination or bullying issues are challenged and resolved consistently and effectively when they occur. The school’s work to improve pupils’ behaviour has not had sufficient impact. A significant number of pupils misbehave and experience consequences too often, including being removed from lessons or suspended. These pupils miss out on valuable curriculum time. In addition, some parents are unclear about the school’s expectations. Leaders should review their approach to behaviour management so that it leads to improvements in pupils’ behaviour, ensuring that parents are clear about how they can support the school too. Leaders have not addressed the high rates of pupil absence well enough,
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
especially for pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils. A significant number of pupils regularly miss too much school, which adversely affects their education. Leaders should take all possible steps to ensure that all pupils attend school regularly. In some subjects, teachers do not use assessment well enough to check that pupils have understood what has been taught. When this happens, teachers do not adapt their teaching to take account of what pupils can do. Leaders need to 3 and 4 October 2023
p.3
4
ensure that all teachers use assessment consistently well to check pupils’ understanding and adapt their teaching and curriculum planning where necessary. Trustees and governors do not have a sufficiently accurate view of the school’s effectiveness. This means they are not precise enough in their support and challenge for leaders, especially around the quality of education, and behaviour and attendance. Those responsible for governance need to ensure that they offer more precise challenge, so they can hold leaders to account and address areas for improvement effectively.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 3 and 4 October 2023
p.4
School details
Type of school Secondary Comprehensive School category Academy converter
p.5
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,024
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
The school joined The Frank Field Education Trust on 1 December 2020. The school uses three alternative providers, one of which is unregistered. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, 3 and 4 October 2023
p.5
6
because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.6
6
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. As a part of this inspection, inspectors met with trustees, the chair of governors, the chair of trustees, the trust CEO, trust personnel, senior leaders, subject leaders and teaching staff, as well as other employees in the school. Inspectors carried out deep dives in: English, mathematics, science, art and modern languages. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the
p.6
6
curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also visited lessons in some other subjects. Inspectors reviewed the school’s extra-curricular activities, enrichment programme and their careers and personal development programmes with leaders. They also visited some scheduled extra-curricular activities. They also reviewed the school’s reading programme. Inspectors reviewed the school’s behaviour and attendance records with school leaders. An inspector also visited the school’s internal exclusion room. The lead inspector spoke to a leader of the unregistered alternative provision used by the school. Inspectors met with members of staff and spoke to pupils, both formally and informally, at various points in the inspection. They took account of responses to a staff survey, a pupil survey and Ofsted Parent View. They also met with groups
p.6
6
of pupils selected by the inspection team and by the school.
p.6
Inspection team
Andrew Madden, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Michael Scott Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 October 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion