Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Teesside University ITT

Inspected 8 Feb 2024 · published 8 Apr 2024 · URN 70106

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alison Stephenson (lead), Karen Anderson, Michael Wardle, Steve Hailstone

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Feb 2024

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alison Stephenson, Karen Anderson, Michael Wardle, Steve Hailstone

  • Postcode verified

    TS1 3BX

  • Name on report verified

    Teesside University ITT

  • URN verified

    70106

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectivestrong relationshipsstrongtrusting relationshipshigh-qualityhigh qualitypoorconsistently
Criticismlacknot confidently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings479w+71
  • What needs to improve129w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
600
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 19%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 76%

Full report text

Teesside University ITT Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley TS1 3BX Inspection dates 5 to 8 February 2024

p.1

Inspection judgements

Primary and secondary age-phase Further education age-phase

p.1

Inspection judgements

The quality of education and training Good Good

p.1

Inspection judgements

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection N/A Good

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Leaders have a clear vision to develop highly effective and resilient teachers for the Tees Valley. They ensure that this vision is central to the development of ITE programmes at the University. Leaders have strong relationships with schools, partner colleges and other stakeholders which they put to good use when planning what trainees need to learn. This means that trainees benefit from a curriculum that prepares them well for the practical realities of teaching in the area. For example, primary and secondary trainees attend a dedicated conference on teaching pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). They also learn from research on the impact of poverty on education.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees in all three phases develop the knowledge, skills and professional behaviours they need to teach in their phase of education. They speak highly of the training that they receive and reflect upon how their teaching improves as a result of this. Trainees in the further education and skills (FES) phase play a full role in the teaching teams that they join. They take part in learner reviews and learn about strategies for managing attendance.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees receive extensive and personalised support to meet their individual needs. Staff are considerate of the workload and well-being of trainees and react quickly when trainees experience difficulties. For example, leaders and tutors provide support for trainees suffering from anxiety, financial difficulties and housing problems. Trainees build strong and trusting relationships with staff and value highly the support they receive.

p.1

Information about this ITE provider

◼ The Teesside University delivers ITE for those preparing to teach in primary, secondary and FES. ◼ At the time of the inspection, there were 55 trainees in the primary phase. Of these, 35 were following an undergraduate programme and 20 were studying a Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE). ◼ At the time of the inspection, there were 43 trainees in the secondary phase. All trainees were studying a PGCE, with 37 on a full-time basis and six on a part-time basis. ◼ Leaders currently work with 20 primary and 25 secondary schools for the provision of placements for trainees. ◼ At the time of the inspection, there were 116 trainees in the FES phase. Trainees study for a Certificate in Education, Professional Graduate Certificate in Education or PGCE. There were 15 trainees based at the university who were studying a pre- service PGCE. There were 25 in-service and 15 pre-service trainees at Darlington

p.2

Information about this ITE provider

College, 18 in-service and nine pre-service trainees at Hartlepool College and 34 in- service trainees at Stockton Riverside College (part of the Education and Training Collective). ◼ In addition, there were 10 apprentices studying the level 5 learning and skills teacher standard. All of these were studying at the university and working in other FES settings, including those within the NHS. ◼ Almost all of the partner schools, colleges and other providers that leaders work with for the delivery of their ITE provision are good or better.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ This was the first inspection of the provider’s primary and secondary phase as this is newer than the FES phase. ◼ The inspection was carried out by seven His Majesty’s Inspectors and one Ofsted Inspector. ◼ Inspectors spoke with a range of leaders from the university as well as leaders from partner schools and colleges. This included the vice-chancellor, deputy vice- chancellor, dean, associate dean teaching and learning, head of department, principal lecturer ITE, partnership lead, mentoring lead, course/programme leaders, school manager and members of the partnership enhancement board. ◼ Inspectors spoke to 55 trainees covering all three phases. This included visits to trainees on placements, face-to-face meetings in centre-based training and online meetings. ◼ In the primary and secondary combined phase, inspectors carried out focused reviews in the following areas: primary early reading, primary art and design, secondary

p.2

Information about this inspection

history, secondary mathematics and secondary chemistry with biology/physics. ◼ In the FES phase, inspectors carried out focused reviews in the partner colleges. These included trainees preparing to teach in the following areas: science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), health and social care, English, mathematics and SEND. There was also a focused review covering university-based apprentices preparing to teach healthcare. ◼ Inspectors visited trainees in four primary schools and five secondary schools as part of their focused reviews. ◼ Inspectors in the FES phase carried out their focused reviews at the university and across the three partner colleges where both centre- and placement-based training takes place. In addition, they visited trainees who are based at different campuses of the partner colleges, held face-to-face meetings at two other FES providers and held a virtual meeting with another FES provider.

p.2

needs to be done better?

Leaders implement a broad and ambitious curriculum for both primary and secondary trainees. They work very well with a range of stakeholders to develop a programme that is informed by current research and prepares trainees to teach in the Tees Valley. Leaders bring in guest speakers to cover topics that have local relevance, such as supporting pupils from Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities.

p.4

needs to be done better?

Staff plan and sequence the phase-specific curriculum well. They integrate the core content framework in a meaningful way so that trainees revisit standards on a regular basis. Staff give trainees the support that they need to become reflective practitioners. Trainees build their knowledge and skills in important areas such as adaptive teaching and classroom management. However, some aspects of the subject-specific curriculum are less well developed than others. Some trainees do not understand well enough the substantive and disciplinary knowledge that pupils need to acquire at different stages.

p.4

needs to be done better?

In the primary phase, the centre-based training provides trainees with a thorough introduction to theories about early reading and the teaching of systematic synthetic phonics. Trainees know how to teach phonics and understand its fundamental importance to the development of children’s reading. However, the curriculum does not provide trainees with sufficient opportunity to practise their teaching of phonics early enough.

p.4

needs to be done better?

Leaders work very well with schools to ensure trainees benefit from high-quality placements and a well-integrated curriculum. School-based training complements and reinforces what trainees are taught at the university. Leaders have high expectations of mentors. They provide mentors with extensive training and useful information about the centre-based training. As a result, mentors provide trainees with practical and precise guidance that helps trainees to develop their teaching practice.

p.4

needs to be done better?

Programme leaders plan a coherent and developmental approach to assessment. Tutors and mentors ensure that trainees secure essential knowledge and that they receive constructive feedback that helps the trainee improve their teaching over time. Leaders implement a series of useful tripartite reviews where tutors, mentors and trainees meet to review the progress and development needs of the trainee.

p.4

needs to be done better?

Leaders check closely the quality of education and training that trainees receive. They collect and respond quickly to feedback from trainees, mentors and other stakeholders as part of their continuous improvement of the programmes. For example, leaders changed the timing of the summative assessment for secondary trainees after feedback from trainees on the timing of this alongside the second placement and the impact of this on their workload. Members of the partnership enhancement board hold leaders to account for the effectiveness of the curriculum, compliance with statutory duties and ensuring that the training trainees receive meets local needs.

p.4

secondary phase?

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority )

p.5

secondary phase?

◼ In the primary phase, the provider does not ensure that all primary trainees have sufficient experience of teaching phonics. This means that some trainees have limited opportunities to develop this important aspect of their work. The provider should work with partner schools to ensure that all trainees have the experience of teaching phonics that they need to teach well in the primary phase. ◼ In the secondary phase, trainees are not consistently taught enough about substantive and disciplinary knowledge in their subject. This means that trainees do not gain the knowledge they need to teach some aspects of their subject as effectively as possible. Leaders should ensure that trainees are taught an appropriate depth of pedagogical content knowledge. They should also make sure that trainees are given greater opportunity to implement that knowledge in the planning and delivery of lessons.

p.5

the ITE compliance criteria?

The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria. Further education and skills phase report

p.5

needs to be done better?

Leaders design and deliver an ambitious curriculum that is grounded in relevant and up-to- date research. This enables trainees and apprentices to cumulatively build highly relevant new knowledge and skills. Tutors skilfully revisit concepts frequently in increasing depth to ensure that trainees and apprentices develop secure knowledge that they can apply successfully to their teaching. Trainees and apprentices plan their lessons carefully, with careful consideration of how their learners learn.

p.6

needs to be done better?

Most tutors teach trainees and apprentices to manage and motivate their learners well. Consequently, most trainees develop sound skills in managing their classrooms and setting high expectations for their learners. However, in some cases, tutors do not provide trainees with sufficient training in these areas or check how well trainees are putting them into practice. In these instances, trainees experience difficulties with learner behaviour in their classrooms.

p.6

needs to be done better?

Tutors work well with mentors to integrate centre- and placement-based components of the programmes effectively. They plan the curriculum carefully so that trainees and apprentices can swiftly put into practice what they have learned. Mentors support and guide trainees and apprentices effectively on how to teach their subject well. For example, mathematics mentors help trainees consider different ways of teaching specific calculations to broaden the ways learners grasp these concepts.

p.6

needs to be done better?

Tutors provide effective training on how to teach learners with SEND and how to adapt teaching strategies to meet specific learning needs. Trainees and apprentices develop valuable skills to plan teaching and assessment that is inclusive for their learners. Many trainees successfully build routine into their lessons and set clear expectations. This benefits all learners, particularly learners with autism.

p.6

needs to be done better?

Leaders ensure that all trainees and apprentices have a suitable mentor who can provide subject-specific support and guidance. Leaders support mentors very well with the observation of trainees to ensure a consistent approach is taken across the partnership. However, leaders do not check well enough the quality of mentoring support that trainees receive. As a result, leaders are not assured that all trainees at partner colleges experience the same consistently high-quality mentoring support.

p.6

needs to be done better?

Leaders and tutors plan the assessment of trainees and apprentices well. Tutors provide effective support to help trainees and apprentices to reflect on their progress and to set themselves clear targets to improve their teaching. Leaders and tutors carefully check the extent to which trainees develop their teaching skills through the trainees’ professional portfolio. However, the tripartite reviews of apprentices’ progress lack depth on occasion and do not provide leaders with clear information about the progress apprentices are making.

p.6

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

◼ A small number of trainees lack knowledge and skills in classroom management. As a result, they are less able to manage poor behaviour from some learners in their class. Leaders should work with tutors in partner colleges to review the teaching that trainees receive in this area. They need to ensure that trainees develop their skills throughout their programme and that they put them into practice in their classrooms competently. ◼ Although leaders provide high levels of support for mentors, including those in partner colleges, they do not check carefully enough the quality of mentoring support that trainees receive. Leaders cannot confidently assure themselves that all trainees receive the same high-quality mentoring. Leaders should ensure they have comprehensive oversight of mentoring so that they know whether the work of mentors is of a consistently high quality. ◼ Leaders implement systems to provide them with oversight of the progress that

p.7

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

trainees and apprentices make. However, the tripartite reviews do not provide leaders with enough information about apprentices’ progress. Leaders should ensure that these reviews are completed fully and in enough depth so that they can better evaluate the impact of the ITE curriculum on apprentices.

p.7

principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision?

The provider meets the principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision in the FES phase.

p.7

principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision?

Leaders provide the apprenticeship provision in response to local demand, particularly from the NHS. Tutors carefully identify what apprentices already know and can do at the start of their apprenticeship. The curriculum is planned in a sensible order so that apprentices cumulatively build the knowledge, skills and behaviours that they need to become successful teachers.

p.7

principles and requirements of apprenticeship provision?

Apprentices have the required time to complete their studies. They develop confidence in their teaching abilities and successfully contribute to their workplace. Employers value highly their apprentices.

p.7

ITE provider details

Unique reference number 70106 Inspection number 10210270

p.8

ITE provider details

This inspection was carried out in accordance with the initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook , which sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.8

ITE provider details

Type of ITE provider Higher education institution

p.8

ITE provider details

Phases provided Primary and secondary combined Further education and skills

p.8

ITE provider details

Date of previous inspection 10 to 13 March 2014

p.8

Inspection team

Andrea Shepherd, Overall lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Ian Rawstorne, Phase lead inspector (Primary and secondary combined) His Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Philippa Firth, Phase lead inspector (further education) His Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Alison Stephenson, Team inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Karen Anderson, Team inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Michael Wardle, Team inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Steve Hailstone, Team inspector Senior His Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Thomas Wraith, Team inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Annex: Placement/employment schools and colleges

Inspectors visited the following schools and colleges as part of this inspection:

p.9

Name URN ITE phases

Reid Street Primary School 136836 Primary Barnard Grove Primary School 146856 Primary Rossmere Academy 149030 Primary Bluebell Meadow Primary School 148138 Primary Macmillan Academy 130908 Secondary High Tunstall College of Science 111748 Secondary Sacred Heart Catholic Secondary 142273 Secondary Dyke House Sports and Technology College 139405 Secondary Manor Community Academy 141686 Secondary Darlington College 130656 FES Queen Elizabeth Sixth Form (Darlington) 130662 FES Hartlepool College of Further Education 130567 FES Prior Purslgove and Stockton Sixth Form 145227 FES Catcote Futures 145163 FES The Education Training Collective 130576 FES guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Name URN ITE phases

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.10

Name URN ITE phases

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Name URN ITE phases

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Name URN ITE phases

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion