Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Dunstable Icknield Lower School

Inspected 15 Nov 2023 · published 4 Apr 2024 · URN 109444

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Jessie Linsley (lead), Tracy Fielding (lead), Helen Jones, Laura Hewer, Peter Stonier

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Nov 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Helen Jones, Jessie Linsley, Laura Hewer, Peter Stonier, Tracy Fielding

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    LU6 3AG

  • Name on report verified

    Dunstable Icknield Lower School

  • URN verified

    109444

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconfidentimprovingoutstandingsuccessfullyhigh expectationsaccuratelyfeel safekeen
Criticismnot alwaysnot consistentlynot securenot yetstruggleunclearnot confidentlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1281w+20
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve131w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,387
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Dunstable Icknield Lower School Burr Street, Dunstable, Bedfordshire LU6 3AG

p.1

Inspection dates: 14 and 15 November 2023, and 6 February 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 12 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 14 and 15 November 2023, and 6 February 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Expectations of pupils’ behaviour are improving. Some pupils behave well and understand how to follow the rules. However, there are some pupils whose behaviour disrupts the learning of others. Pupils try hard to concentrate, but they become frustrated when they cannot learn as well as they should.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

More recently, pupils are becoming increasingly confident that behaviour is getting better. Pupils say that they feel safe and that bullying is not common. There are some pupils who get extra support with their behaviour. This helps them to make the right choices about their behaviour and understand the impact this has on others.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Expectations of pupils’ achievement are not high enough. The school has made recent changes to the teaching of reading for older pupils and writing for all. These changes are not yet fully developed but are making some differences to pupils’ learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have opportunities to extend their experiences beyond the curriculum. These include sporting and other clubs that develop pupils’ talents. Pupils like to take on extra responsibilities. Some of these are new, while others are not developing pupils as much as they could. For instance, the school council is keen to have a more significant role.

p.2

better?

The school has recently reviewed the curriculum. Leaders have carefully chosen the vocabulary pupils need to learn from the early years to Year 4. As a result, pupils learn the subject-specific language they need. However, the school has not fully developed curriculum plans for the foundation subjects. The plans do not make clear the skills and knowledge that pupils need to learn from the early years. As a result, it is hard for the early years staff to know what to teach the children so that they are fully ready for Year 1.

p.2

better?

Early reading is a priority. Pupils are introduced to the foundations of phonics in Nursery and begin to learn phonics as soon as they start in Reception. However, there is a variation in the quality with which teachers ask the children to recall letter sounds. Children successfully read books that match their phonics knowledge. In key stage 1, staff check pupils’ progress at regular points. Where needed, pupils have ‘keep-up’ sessions. These help pupils who struggle with reading to catch up before they enter Year 3. The school has made recent changes to the teaching of reading for pupils in key stage 2 to promote a love of reading. This is supporting many pupils to become confident and more regular readers.

p.2

better?

In the early years, staff design tasks that develop children’s early mathematics skills effectively. Children can practise and improve their basic skills. Tasks link well to the class learning, and children are keen to try them out. However, experiences in other 14 and 15 November 2023, and 6 February 2024

p.2

3

areas of learning do not develop children’s knowledge well enough. As a result, children are not being prepared as well as they should be for learning areas of the curriculum in Year 1.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are identified accurately. However, the school does not seek the support some pupils need quickly enough. The school does check pupils’ progress. However, these checks do not precisely and consistently focus on the needs of pupils. This means that teachers’ expectations for what pupils with SEND can achieve are not always high enough.

p.3

3

The school has focused on improving behaviour. The existing behaviour systems have been revised. Staff have received additional training. Leaders have successfully put in place various individual plans to support pupils to behave and learn well. Staff, parents and pupils have mixed views about behaviour at the school. The school is focusing on getting this right. However, it is taking time for everyone to feel more confident about the actions being taken and their impact on improving behaviour.

p.3

3

Leaders take care of pupils and consider well their emotional and well-being needs. The school provides a broad personal development programme, which supports pupils’ social and emotional development needs. The school ensures that all pupils have access to various interesting experiences, such as theatre visits. Pupils remember these well. Leaders have considered carefully how to develop pupils’ character.

p.3

3

Governors have pupils’ best interests at the heart of their work. They visit the school regularly to find out what is happening. However, their oversight of the school’s work is not precise enough for them to hold leaders to account rigorously. Governors’ knowledge and understanding of key aspects, such as behaviour, are not secure enough. They cannot gather the right information to give them an accurate view of the school’s provision. This limits the challenge and support that governors can provide to improve the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Governors do not have the depth of knowledge and understanding required to be able to support and hold leaders to account for key aspects of the school’s work, such as the quality of education and promoting positive behaviour and attitudes. The school should ensure that governors can gather and evaluate the information needed so that they can provide appropriate support and challenge to hold leaders fully to account for improving the school. 14 and 15 November 2023, and 6 February 2024

p.3

4

 Curriculum plans for some foundation subjects do not begin in the early years. Consequently, it is unclear exactly what knowledge and skills children need to learn in the Reception class to be fully ready for the key stage 1 curriculum. The school needs to develop the subject plans further and identify the key developmental knowledge that children should learn.  The early reading programme is not taught consistently in all classes. Some staff do not make sure that all pupils have listened carefully to the sounds and then repeat them back accurately. This slows pupils’ progress. The school needs to monitor the effectiveness of the teaching of early reading and ensure that staff are supported to improve their practice where needed.  The school does not carefully develop the academic knowledge of pupils with SEND carefully enough. Teachers’ expectations for pupils with SEND are not always high enough. Systems that create targets for pupils are not individual or

p.4

4

specific enough. The school should ensure that all support for pupils with SEND accurately meets their specific needs and that all staff have high expectations so that pupils with SEND achieve well.  Some pupils do not meet the school’s expectations for behaviour. Some pupils, parents and staff are not confident in the changes taking place to secure better behaviour. The school needs to ensure that it continues to provide further training, guidance and support to ensure that everyone can contribute to improving behaviour.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 14 and 15 November 2023, and 6 February 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the previous inspection, there have been significant changes to staffing. While the school has been going through the process of recruiting permanent staff and covering long-term absence, there has been a period where temporary staff have been in place.  The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is well above the national average.  The proportion of pupils with SEND has increased recently.  The school uses the services of one alternative provider.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors first visited the school on 14 and 15 November 2023. Ofsted deemed that further evidence was required to secure the inspection judgements. As a result, this 14 and 15 November 2023, and 6 February 2024

p.5

6

inspection was deemed ‘incomplete.’ Two of His Majesty’s Inspectors visited the school on 6 February 2024 to gather more evidence about behaviour and attitudes.

p.6

6

 Inspections are point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, computing, physical education and geography. For each deep dive, the inspectors held discussions with the curriculum lead, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The inspectors also carried out further explorations into the mathematics curriculum, writing curriculum and ther curriculum for personal, social, health and economic education by looking at workbooks and carrying out some lesson visits.  The inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour at lunchtime and in lessons.

p.6

6

 Meetings were held with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, the assistant headteacher, the special educational needs coordinator, middle leaders and other school staff.  The lead inspector spoke with a representative from the local authority.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of staff, leaders and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspectors considered the 67 responses and 37 free-text responses made by parents to the survey, Ofsted Parent View. The inspectors also considered the 37 responses to Ofsted’s online staff questionnaire.  The inspectors examined a range of documents provided by the school, including leaders’ school development plans and the school’s self-evaluation document.

p.6

Inspection team

Jessie Linsley, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Tracy Fielding, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Peter Stonier His Majesty’s Inspector 14 and 15 November 2023, and 6 February 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion