Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)

Childminder in Durham

Inspected 28 Feb 2024 · published 3 Apr 2024 · URN EY482366

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Elaine McDonnell

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    EY482366

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−80Very criticalmore positive than 3% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehappysettledattentivesafeaccurate
Criticismweakfailedpoorweaknessesstrugglenot effectiveconcernslacks

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings669w−82
  • Safeguarding205w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
840
about usual (typical 899)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 51
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 1
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Safeguarding 16%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate

p.1

The provision is inadequate

There are concerns regarding the childminder's ability to raise the quality of care and education for children at her setting. She has failed to sustain improvements made in relation to actions raised at her last inspection, and demonstrates a poor understanding of safeguarding practices. For instance, the childminder is not aware of the role of the local authority designated officer. In addition, she does not demonstrate an acceptable knowledge and understanding of how to identify, understand, and respond appropriately to signs of possible abuse and neglect, including female genital mutilation. Despite her completing some online safeguarding children training since the last inspection, she is still not aware of the 'Prevent' duty guidance. This means that children's safety is still not prioritised. The childminder received support from the local authority to put in place a safeguarding policy and procedure; however, she lacks an understanding of how to implement

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The childminder has not addressed any of the actions raised at her last inspection to improve children's learning and development. For example, she is still not able to demonstrate what she wants children to learn and why. Although children appear to be happy and settled in the childminder's care, the quality of interactions are weak. The childminder is not aware of how young children learn. Furthermore, she does not show a clear understanding of the learning and development requirements as set out in the early years foundation stage.

p.2

need to do better?

n The childminder's knowledge and understanding of safeguarding and child protection are still weak. This concern has also been highlighted at previous inspections. This shows that the childminder is not making the necessary improvements required to prioritise children's welfare. n The childminder is not monitoring children's progress effectively. As a result, children's learning experiences with her are very limited. Children are not making sufficient progress in their learning and development, and the childminder is not preparing them for their next steps in learning. In addition, the childminder does not evaluate her provision to identify weaknesses in her practice. This impacts on her ability to make improvements. n The childminder explains that she plays with children. However, she does not have any learning intentions in mind and she does not plan specific learning for children. As a result, children are not supported to explore or be creative. When

p.2

need to do better?

the childminder provides mark-making items for children, these are not age and stage appropriate. For example, she gives toddlers a colouring book which they struggle to keep the pages open and thin pencils that they struggle to hold and use.

p.2

need to do better?

28 February 2024 n Children's language and communication skills are not prioritised within the setting. The childminder is attentive to children and talks to them a lot. However, she does not encourage children to respond. Therefore, communication is one sided and children do not always speak, or attempt to speak. n Children do not have access to books or other literature. This does not promote children's early literacy skills and does not help to prepare them for nursery and school. The childminder has not engaged with the other settings that children also attend. She has still not considered how partnership working will support children's continuity of care, learning and development. n The childminder has ensured that her premises are safe and suitable for children. The gardens are not used for outdoor play. However, the childminder ensures that she takes children on daily outings to provide basic opportunities

p.2

need to do better?

for children to develop their physical skills. They also visit a music and rhyme group activity on a weekly basis. n Parents receive regular updates and photographs through text messages about their child's day and their play. n Some adequate care routines are appropriately implemented and the childminder offers healthy meals and snacks. However, children do not have easy access to drinking water, and show that they are thirsty by lunchtime when a drink is provided with food.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.

p.3

Due date

improve knowledge and understanding of the safeguarding children policy and procedure, including the role of the local authority designated officer 11/03/2024

p.3

Due date

28 February 2024 improve knowledge and understanding of safeguarding and demonstrate an ability to identify, understand and respond appropriately to signs of possible abuse and neglect at the earliest opportunity, including female genital mutilation 11/03/2024

p.3

Due date

gain an awareness of, and take into account, the government's statutory guidance 'Working Together to Safeguard Children' and 'Prevent duty guidance for England and Wales' 11/03/2024

p.4

Due date

ensure that drinking water is always available and is accessible to children. 11/03/2024

p.4

Due date

develop an appropriate curriculum to ensure that all areas of learning outlined in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage' are considered and planned for, with particular regard to the prime areas of learning 27/03/2024

p.4

Due date

use accurate assessment procedures to suitably plan for children's next steps and support their ongoing development in all areas of learning 27/03/2024

p.4

Due date

give consideration to the environment to support children's learning and ensure that they have access to a suitable range of resources, including books and age- appropriate mark-making items. 27/03/2024

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY482366 Local authority Durham Inspection number 10315845 Type of provision Childminder

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 8 Date of previous inspection 27 September 2023

p.5

Information about this early years setting

The childminder registered in 2014 and lives in Peterlee. She operates her childminding service all year round from Monday to Friday, 7am to 7.30pm, except for family holidays.

p.5

Inspection activities

n The inspector discussed any continued impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The childminder showed the inspector the premises and discussed how they ensure that they are safe and suitable. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided indoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder and children. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.

p.5

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.5

Inspection activities

28 February 2024 28 February 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion