Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in Lancashire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 Feb 2024
- Inspectors verified
Denise Farrington
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Met
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY454292
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Poor knowledge and understanding leads to the failure to meet the needs of some children which has a significant impact on their development. p.2
- Gaps in knowledge and self-evaluation result in breaches of the requirements of the early years foundation stage. p.2
- A failure to seek the support of relevant professionals promptly, means that gaps in children's learning and development continue to widen over time. p.2
- The childminder's leadership and management is weak. p.2
- There are significant weaknesses in the provision and curriculum for children who may require additional support. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- strengthen arrangements in place to support children with SEND that helps to ensure any developmental needs or concerns are shared with relevant agencies and that support is promptly secured p.4
- implement robust self-evaluation procedures in order to identify and address any weaknesses in practice and target future professional development. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes5
“needs of children and children make poor progress.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 771
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Met
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder's leadership and management is weak. Gaps in knowledge and self-evaluation result in breaches of the requirements of the early years foundation stage. This has a detrimental impact on children's outcomes. There are significant weaknesses in the provision and curriculum for children who may require additional support. The childminder struggles to meet the needs of children who attend. While she identifies that some children need additional support from outside agencies, she does not know how to acquire this. A failure to seek the support of relevant professionals promptly, means that gaps in children's learning and development continue to widen over time. Children's needs are not met. Consequently, children do not thrive and are not prepared well for the next stage in their learning and eventual move to school.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
There are limited opportunities for children to build upon their existing knowledge and skills. The childminder does not plan or provide a curriculum that supports children to make good progress. Interactions with children are, overall, weak and do not support their overall behaviour or the next steps in their learning. For example, when beginning to join in children's play, the childminder is regularly distracted by the need to offer reassurance and comfort to children who are distressed. This results in the needs of other children not being adequately met. That said, the childminder has a good understanding of safeguarding and child protection issues. She conducts regular risk assessment checks to help maintain the environment. This helps to ensure that children are kept safe from harm.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder's self-evaluation is weak. Although she recognises some gaps in her knowledge, she does not take appropriate action to address this. For example, professional development opportunities have focused on the completion of mandatory training. Opportunities to enhance the childminder's knowledge and understanding in key aspects of practice, such as the provision for children with SEND, have not been prioritised. The childminder does demonstrate a determination to address weaknesses and improve. n Poor knowledge and understanding leads to the failure to meet the needs of some children which has a significant impact on their development. Despite identifying when some children may need extra help, the childminder is unsure of how to seek further advice and support from other professionals. This means that some children do not receive the support they require for considerable amounts of time. As a result, the childminder struggles to adequately meet the
p.2
need to do better?
needs of children and children make poor progress. n The childminder is unclear in what she intends children to learn. She does not purposefully plan opportunities to teach children key skills and knowledge in a
p.2
need to do better?
23 February 2024 sequential way. Much of children's learning is incidental. Despite observing and assessing children's progress, identified next steps are not precise enough and are not used to develop an ambitious curriculum which supports children to make progress. n Children are free to choose from a variety of resources and are relied upon to initiate their own learning. The childminder, when able, joins in children's play and talks to them about what they are doing. She uses these opportunities to introduce new words to enhance children's vocabulary. For example, as children build towers, the childminder introduces the word 'structure'. That said, opportunities to join and extend children's play are limited. This does not effectively support children's learning. n Children enjoy a variety of trips in the local area and further afield. For example, following children's interest in monkeys, the childminder planned a visit to the
p.2
need to do better?
zoo. Opportunities for children to safely explore the local area supports them in developing an understanding the world around them. n The childminder provides a variety of healthy meals and snacks. Children are reminded of the importance of leading a healthy lifestyle. They are supported to clean their hands before they eat and to drink only from their own water bottle. Children have plentiful opportunities to play both in the childminder's garden and at the local park. This contributes to children's good health.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
put in place appropriate training that strengthens skills and knowledge and that promotes a clear understanding of the role and responsibilities in order to provide good quality early years provision 28/05/2024
p.3
Due date
plan and implement a carefully sequenced curriculum that meets children's individual learning needs. 28/05/2024
p.3
should:
n strengthen arrangements in place to support children with SEND that helps to ensure any developmental needs or concerns are shared with relevant agencies and that support is promptly secured n implement robust self-evaluation procedures in order to identify and address any weaknesses in practice and target future professional development.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY454292 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 10308389 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 5 Date of previous inspection 28 March 2018
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder was registered in 2012 and lives in Oswaldtwistle, Lancashire. She operates all year round from 7am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate qualification at level 6.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the childminder received since the COVID- 19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the childminder and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the childminder. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their EYFS curriculum. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the imp[cat this was having on children's learning. n The inspector observed interactions between the childminder and the children. n The childminder and the inspector jointly evaluated an activity provided. n The views of parents were considered as part of the inspection. n minder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.
p.5
Inspection activities
23 February 2024 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
23 February 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion