Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Star Greenwich Education

Inspected 22 Feb 2024 · published 2 Apr 2024 · URN 2741644

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Manning

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Feb 2024

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Manning

  • Postcode verified

    SE18 6AY

  • Name on report verified

    Star Greenwich Education

  • URN verified

    2741644

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−38Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyindependentstrengthseffectiveenjoyfeel safeclearsecure
Criticismweaknessesnot effectivenot sufficientlytoo oftentoo fewconcernconcernslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,079
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Star Greenwich Education Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Paul Manning, His Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Inspection dates: 21 and 22 February 2024

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 16 Beresford Square London SE18 6AY Monitoring visit: Star Greenwich Education, 21 and 22 February 2024

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Ofsted undertakes to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision funded by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Star Greenwich Education (SGE) is an independent training provider based in Woolwich Arsenal, south-east London. It was established in 2012, initially teaching full-cost programmes. SGE started teaching apprentices in May 2023. At the time of the monitoring visit, 21 apprentices were studying standards-based apprenticeships. Seven apprentices study the level 4 lead practitioner apprenticeship in adult care and six apprentices study the level 3 mortgage adviser standard. Fewer than five apprentices study the level 2 adult care worker and the level 3 dental nurse apprenticeships. Apprentices are based in London and Nottingham. All apprentices are over 19 years old.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Fifteen apprentices study functional skills qualifications in mathematics and English as part of their apprenticeship.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have not made the full requirements of apprenticeship training clear to employers and apprentices. For example, employers are not aware that apprentices should receive paid off-the-job training time and have a limited understanding of the final assessment process. Because of this, apprentices frequently attend training during their own time or take unpaid time off work to attend lessons.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have not planned the teaching of functional skills in English and mathematics early enough in the apprenticeships. Too many apprentices have not received any teaching in mathematics or English functional skills. Because of this, very few apprentices are on target to complete their training by their planned end date. Monitoring visit: Star Greenwich Education, 21 and 22 February 2024 Leaders do not have sufficient understanding of apprenticeships to be able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the training they provide. They do not have oversight of the progress that apprentices make. Leaders do not know what they need to do to improve their training or how to support apprentices effectively to achieve their apprenticeships on time.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not have suitable governance arrangements in place. Leaders recognise that this would help them improve the quality of training but have yet to identify a suitable way of implementing this.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders have formed effective partnerships with employers, some of whom speak highly of the provider. Leaders respond proactively to employers’ requests for apprenticeship training in Nottingham. However, leaders do not have sufficient expertise in the apprenticeships they offer in this area. As a result, apprentices do not receive sufficient support or training and their progress is slow.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Teachers do not identify apprentices’ existing skills, knowledge and behaviours effectively at the start of the apprenticeship. Teachers do not plan their teaching to take into account apprentices’ different levels of skills. For example, for mortgage adviser apprentices who are qualified accountants, the content of the apprenticeship is not sufficiently challenging.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not make sure that apprentices receive sufficient planned off-the-job training. Apprentices enjoy the sessions they attend; however, too often apprentices are set independent learning which is not planned, monitored or checked by their teachers.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not make sure that apprentices benefit from frequent and helpful progress reviews. Too few apprentices attend meetings where they review the progress they make and agree on future targets. Most apprentices and their employers are not clear on the progress they make or how they can improve their work.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders have recruited teachers with appropriate industry experience. Teachers use their industry knowledge effectively to link topics they teach to the work environment. For example, health and social care teachers explain how to manage challenging behaviour in dementia patients and how concepts such as respect and dignity impact the practice of care workers.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not provide effective continuous professional development opportunities for teachers. Leaders do not provide training to teachers who are new to teaching Monitoring visit: Star Greenwich Education, 21 and 22 February 2024 apprentices. Because of this, these teachers are not preparing their apprentices well enough for their final assessment.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not have effective partnerships with local safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ agencies. Leaders do not provide sufficient training to staff on the local risks and threats associated with radicalisation and extremism. Teachers do not have relevant and up-to-date information to pass on to apprentices. Because of this, apprentices are not aware of the local risks and threats in the areas in which they live and work.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Apprentices feel safe. Dental apprentices and health and social care apprentices learn about safeguarding during their on-the-job training. However, teachers do not routinely include safeguarding topics in their teaching. As a result, mortgage adviser apprentices do not have a secure understanding of safeguarding or how to report a safeguarding concern.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders have an appropriate safeguarding policy and procedure for reporting safeguarding concerns. The designated safeguarding lead is appropriately trained. Monitoring visit: Star Greenwich Education, 21 and 22 February 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Insufficient progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Insufficient progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion