Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Childminder in Worcestershire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
28 Mar 2024
- URN verified
EY461676
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure safeguarding policies and procedures are understood, so that signs indicating a child may be at risk of harm are recognised, and concerns are reported in a timely manner p.1
- We suspended the provider's registration because we believed children may be at risk of harm. p.1
- Suspension allows time for the provider to take steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of harm to children. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 590
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 20 February 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 29 February 2024, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The report and inspection outcome will be published in due course.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We suspended the provider's registration because we believed children may be at risk of harm. Suspension allows time for the provider to take steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of harm to children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Following the inspection, we served a welfare requirements notice on 15 March 2024. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. Actions needed by 25 March 2024.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure procedures for risk assessment are effective so that any hazards that pose a risk to children's safety are removed or minimised
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure safeguarding policies and procedures are understood, so that signs indicating a child may be at risk of harm are recognised, and concerns are reported in a timely manner
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that at least one person on site has a valid paediatric first aid certificate
p.1
Summary of outcome
n make sure that all required information and records are sufficiently organised and are easily accessible and made available upon request
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure the required adult-to-child ratios are maintained so that the individual needs of the children are met
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure the ongoing suitability of assistants is monitored to make sure they remain suitable to work with children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 26 March 2024, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection.
p.2
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider had improved their knowledge and understanding of child protection procedures and now fully understands their responsibilities. The childminder has improved their procedures for risk assessment. Cupboard locks have been fitted and a daily checklist helps to ensure risks are identified and removed in a timely manner. The childminder and her assistant have completed training to meet the actions and strengthen their knowledge. For example, paediatric first aid training, safeguarding training, curriculum webinars and she has also signed up to a mentorship programme. New procedures for storing information and records are now in place. The childminder will fully consider the needs of all the children and how she can successfully meet these when considering her ratios. She has designed a robust procedure for monitoring the on-going suitability of her assistants with regular supervision and declarations to complete. We are satisfied the
p.2
Summary of outcome
provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised.
p.2
Summary of outcome
We have now lifted the suspension because the provider took appropriate action to deal with the matter that led to the suspension, and we are satisfied that there is now no risk of harm to children. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion