Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Bents Green School

Inspected 21 Feb 2024 · published 28 Mar 2024 · URN 107169

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Mills (lead), Claire Leech, David Penny

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    21 Feb 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Claire Leech, David Mills, David Penny

  • Postcode verified

    S11 7TB

  • Name on report verified

    Bents Green School

  • URN verified

    107169

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivelyhigh expectationspositivelyambitioussupportivepolitenurturing
Criticismlacknot strongseriousnot alwayslacksconcernsnot clearlygaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings790w+38
  • Safeguarding561w−38

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,342
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 40%Safeguarding 28%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Bents Green School Ringinglow Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S11 7TB

p.1

Inspection dates: 20 and 21 February 2024

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Bents Green School is a place where individual pupils matter. The school knows each pupil well. It works with parents and carers to remove barriers to pupils’ learning and ensures that pupils with complex special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) progress well. The school is split across three sites in different areas of Sheffield. Pupils attend the provision that is best matched to support their SEND and individual needs. Some pupils attend a provision in a secondary school. This is for a small number of pupils who are able to access mainstream education.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are supportive of each other. They are polite and friendly. They show respect towards others. Leaders have high expectations for what pupils can achieve. The school is re-developing the curriculum to meet the needs of all pupils more fully. This includes the approaches to phonics and reading. The school is strengthening the personal development and wider curriculum offer. Pupils follow several learning pathways. These pathways are designed to meet pupils’ specific SEND. Some curriculum pathways are more developed than others.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils demonstrate positive attitudes to learning. They attend well. They progress to post- 16 provision in school or follow training and education programmes that meet their needs and interests when they leave. This is a calm school. Staff address any misbehaviour or bullying in a swift and nurturing manner. This helps pupils to understand their own behaviour and learn positive ways to conduct themselves.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The development of pupils’ phonic knowledge and reading skills is at a transition point. The school does not have a consistent strategy for teaching phonics and reading, including for staff professional development. The school has started to introduce a new 20 and 21 February 2024

p.1

2

reading scheme. It is replacing older phonics and reading approaches to better meet pupils’ needs. Pupils engage well with these lessons. They are keen to read in class and to visitors. However, a minority of staff are trained in the new phonics scheme. Leaders have correctly identified that some teachers’ confidence varies when teaching pupils to read. Leaders recognise the need for greater consistency in approach across the school.

p.2

2

Pupils follow a pathway model of learning, designed to meet pupils’ individual SEND. Most pathways offer a broad curriculum. Some are more developed than others. In most subjects, the school has organised the curriculum carefully, but this is not always evidenced clearly in lessons. However, pupils engage with learning positively. Pupils in the ‘The Hub’ follow the mainstream school’s curriculum. They learn in mainstream lessons with the support of Bents Green School staff. These pupils feel fully included in the life of the mainstream school.

p.2

2

One school site has more pupils than it has comfortable room for. Some classes require maintenance and modernisation. Some areas of the school are inaccessible to pupils with physical disabilities. However, pupils behave well. Across school sites, pupils respond to staff positively. When pupils lose focus, staff swiftly intervene. Staff are calm and patient. This ensures that pupils’ behaviour does not escalate. Most pupils feel safe in school. Leaders have invested time and resources to develop a positive school climate. The school records behaviour incidents clearly, including details of staff actions and any follow up. There is a downward trend of negative behaviour despite the increasing number of pupils joining the school.

p.2

2

Aspects of personal development lack coherence. The school has not clearly linked pupils’ personal development between pathways. Some teachers lack the knowledge they need to teach elements of personal development effectively. Some pupils have a less well- developed understanding of risks and how to recognise them. They do not have a consistently strong understanding of the risks that they face in the community. In contrast, most have a better understanding of the risks they may face while using technology. Most pupils understand consent and appropriate touch well.

p.2

2

Staff feel supported by leaders. They receive regular professional development, including safeguarding updates. Staff feel that their workload is purposeful. Leaders ensure staff have sufficient information to support pupils with complex SEND effectively. Early career teachers feel well supported. They receive appropriate time to prepare lessons and develop their teaching practice. Governors recognise that aspects of the school’s work need to improve. They understand that the sharp increase in pupil numbers has been a challenge to the school.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

3

 The school does not have a consistent strategy to teach phonics and reading, including staff professional development. Lessons lack consistency. This means that some pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable. The school should implement a consistent phonics scheme and should continue to develop teachers’ confidence and practice.  Some curriculum pathways are less developed than others. This means the development of pupils’ knowledge is less strong in some subject areas than others. The school should strengthen the curriculum to ensure all subjects and lessons are ambitious and that teachers have a good knowledge of the range of subjects and courses that they teach.  The school’s approach to pupils’ personal development lacks coherence. Personal development is not clearly linked between learning pathways. This results in gaps in provision and some pupils’ development. Staff lack the necessary training to deliver

p.3

3

some elements of personal development effectively. The school should strengthen its personal development curriculum, including staff training, to ensure all pupils experience a rich and varied wider curriculum offer.  Some pupils lack a secure understanding of the risks that they may face in the community. This means that they may not fully understand ways to keep themselves safe. The school should ensure all pupils develop a stronger understanding of the risks they may face to better prepare them for adulthood.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in July 2014.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 20 and 21 February 2024

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 20 and 21 February 2024

p.4

form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

form

Headteacher Aileen Hosty and Laura Rzepinski

p.5

form

Dates of previous inspection 25 September 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Bents Green School is a special school for pupils aged between 11 and 19 years. It is based across three sites.  One provision, called ‘The Hub’, is at Westfield School in Sheffield. This is for up to 20 pupils who follow a mainstream curriculum. There are 12 pupils who currently attend the provision.  The co-headteachers have been in post since April 2023.  The number of pupils on the school roll has doubled since the last graded inspection.  Pupils join the school throughout the academic year.  The school makes provision for pupils with autism and communication and interaction SEND. All pupils have an education, health and care plan.  Some pupils attend lessons at alternative education providers. They remain single registered at Bents Green School. 20 and 21 February 2024

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the co-headteachers, members of the senior leadership team, SENCo, curriculum leaders, teachers and support staff.  The lead inspector met with representatives of the governing body.  The lead inspector spoke by telephone to a representative of Learn Sheffield, a school improvement company that works with the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, and personal, social and health education. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some

p.6

Information about this inspection

pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The provision for teaching reading was also closely scrutinised.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The lead inspector observed pupils reading to a familiar adult.  Inspectors reviewed a range of school documents, including the school’s self-evaluation and development plans.  Inspectors looked at a range of information regarding behaviour. They observed the behaviour of pupils in classrooms and at social times.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s surveys for pupils, staff and parents. This included any free-text responses to Ofsted Parent View.

p.6

Inspection team

David Mills, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

David Penny Ofsted Inspector 20 and 21 February 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion