Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Marhamchurch CofE Academy
Summary
Jason Edge (lead), Jonathan Gower
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Feb 2024
- Inspectors verified
Jason Edge, Jonathan Gower
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
EX23 0HY
- Name on report verified
Marhamchurch CofE Academy
- URN verified
144063
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The headteacher of this school is Deirdre Petersen. p.1
- This school is part of Learning Academy Partnership (South West), which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. p.1
- The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Tracey Cleverly, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Joanne Tisdall. 27 and 28 February 2024 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion3
“This includes the accurate identification of pupils with SEND.” p.2Parents & families2
“Parents rightly regard her highly.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,159
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Marhamchurch CofE Academy Helebridge Road, Marhamchurch, Bude, Cornwall EX23 0HY
p.1
Inspection dates: 27 and 28 February 2024
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The headteacher of this school is Deirdre Petersen. This school is part of Learning Academy Partnership (South West), which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Tracey Cleverly, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Joanne Tisdall. 27 and 28 February 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Marhamchurch is a happy, calm and safe environment for pupils. They enjoy school and have positive attitudes to learning. Children in the early years show sustained concentration in tasks. Older pupils show care and compassion towards their younger peers at playtimes. Pupils speak to visitors with both courtesy and confidence. Bullying is not an issue.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
However, the school is recovering from a period of steep decline. The transfer to the current trust has been a positive one. It has started to address the many weaknesses in the curriculum. There are green shoots emerging, particularly in pupils knowing more and remembering more over time. The recently appointed headteacher has been the driving force behind this. Parents rightly regard her highly. Nevertheless, there is still a lot more to do. The school recognises this.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Sport has a high profile at the school. Pupils enjoy participating in tournaments and representing the school. Nevertheless, the school has started to broaden its offer beyond the academic further in order to align with its vision of ‘Life in all its fullness’. Pupils learn to play a range of musical instruments. Playground leaders and ‘Values Champions’ give pupils an active role in the running of the school, such as leading assemblies.
p.2
better?
In the past pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), have not learned well. This was caused by an ill-defined curriculum. Staff were not given the necessary training to teach it effectively. As a result, in 2023 the vast majority of pupils transferred to secondary school without the essential knowledge and skills needed in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.2
better?
On the transfer to the trust, it quickly reviewed the school’s work using both internal checks and external audits. It accurately identified the severity of the situation. Its improvement plans are both cohesive and timely.
p.2
better?
Above all, the trust recognised the urgent need to introduce a well-sequenced and ambitious curriculum from early years to Year 6 so that pupils would build on their learning in a logical order. This has helped to establish a coherent learning journey for pupils. For example, in science, detailed curriculum thinking means pupils’ learning builds well over time. However, some subject plans need further refinement so that they more precisely identify the knowledge pupils need to know.
p.2
better?
The school has put in place an extensive amount of training and support for staff to help them to teach well. This includes the accurate identification of pupils with SEND. Teachers have started to better adapt provision to meet pupils’ needs.
p.2
better?
Although the scale of changes has been significant, the school has balanced staff’s workload and sought to reassure them of the rationale behind the changes. In 27 and 28 February 2024
p.2
3
particular, the headteacher has been a calm, composed and well-respected figure throughout this time. Staff have received this support positively and are grateful for leaders helping to settle things down. As one member of staff described it, ‘We have been on a rollercoaster’.
p.3
3
There is a clear initial impact to this work. Pupils have started to recall their knowledge over the long term. Teachers have begun to check how well pupils have remembered previous learning. In subjects such as mathematics and history, pupils can discuss their learning in increasing depth. However, they can still learn more. On some occasions teachers provide pupils with tasks that do not match the curriculum intent or are ambitious enough. Consequently, their depth of learning varies.
p.3
3
Reading is at the front and centre of the school’s curriculum. It has introduced a more structured approach to the teaching of early reading. This starts in the Reception Year. Historically, too many pupils fell behind in reading and did not catch up. The school now has clear systems for identifying pupils who are struggling. Through targeted support, staff are helping these pupils to become fluent readers. However, while outcomes are rising, some staff require further support to help them teach reading in the agreed way. Sometimes they confuse pupils in their explanations or the help they give.
p.3
3
Pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain. They talk with excitement about the upcoming trip to Bristol to learn about more diverse parts of the country. Pupils demonstrate great maturity and tolerance when discussing issues of discrimination, such as racism and sexism. They know about potential dangers in society, such as vaping.
p.3
3
Trustees and members of the local ethos and advisory committee have an accurate picture of the school. They are clear that while many improvements have been made, much of the work is at a relatively early stage.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The curriculum is at various stages of development. In some subjects, the trust has not precisely identified the important knowledge that pupils need to learn and remember. This means that pupils do not always build their knowledge well over time. The trust needs to ensure that all subjects identify the knowledge that pupils must learn and when. On some occasions teachers provide activities which do not match the curriculum intention or are ambitious enough. As a result, pupils do not learn some new knowledge securely. The trust must ensure that the work given to pupils closely 27 and 28 February 2024
p.3
4
matches the curriculum intention, is ambitious and takes into account pupils’ prior knowledge. Some staff do not have the necessary subject knowledge to deliver the phonics programme as the school intends. This means that some pupils do not learn to read quickly enough. The trust should ensure that staff are supported and trained to teach phonics in line with the school's agreed approaches.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 27 and 28 February 2024
p.4
School details
Date of previous inspection 8 June 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school transferred to Learning Academy Partnership (South West) in November 2022. The headteacher joined the school in 2023. The school does not use any alternative provision. The school is designated as having a religious character. Its last Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools took place in 2022, when it received a judgement of good.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 27 and 28 February 2024
p.5
6
Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with trust executive leaders, the headteacher, groups of staff, groups of pupils, a representative from the diocese, trustees and members of the local ethos and advisory committee. Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also discussed the curriculum and looked at samples of work in science and geography. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive
p.6
6
culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site. An inspector spoke to parents at the start of the school day. Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View.
p.6
Inspection team
Jason Edge, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Jonathan Gower Ofsted Inspector 27 and 28 February 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion