Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Mar 2024

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rebecca Sharples

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Rebecca Sharples

  • Postcode verified

    L30 2QQ

  • Name on report verified

    IMPACT This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 21

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−10Mixedmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovedconfidentenjoyconsistentlywell supportedclearaccurately
Criticismweaknessesseriousgapstoo manylow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings253w−67
  • What needs to improve607w+8

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
860
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 29%What needs to improve 71%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Jason Webb Headteacher IMPACT Daleacre Campus Daleacre Drive Bootle Liverpool Merseyside L30 2QQ

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of IMPACT

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 21 February 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in May 2023.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of IMPACT

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of IMPACT

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, governors and a representative from the local authority, the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited lessons, met with staff and pupils, sampled pupils’ work and a range of documentation. I focused on checking the schools’ work to improve the quality of education, the support for pupils at the early stages of reading and the provision for pupils’ personal development. I also considered the schools’ ongoing work to improve pupils’ behaviour and attendance. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to be no longer judged as having serious weaknesses.

p.1

designation

Since the previous inspection, there have been changes to the senior leadership team including the appointment of additional leaders. The roles of senior leaders have been redefined. In addition, the school has strengthened the attendance team, appointed a new admissions and reintegration leader and two additional teaching assistants to support pupils with reading. Several staff have left the school. The school is in the process of recruiting new staff to fill these vacancies.

p.2

designation

Considerable work has been carried out to improve the quality of education since the last inspection. There are now clear and well-constructed curriculums in place for each subject. The school is beginning to identify the important knowledge that pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), will learn. It has also started to consider how subject knowledge will be ordered so that pupils can more readily build on that they know.

p.2

designation

The school has stronger processes in place than in the past to establish pupils’ starting points when they begin at the school. This allows staff to effectively structure new learning that builds on pupils’ prior knowledge. The school is trialling a new approach to assessing pupils’ learning. However, this is in its infancy. Consequently, gaps in pupils’ knowledge sometimes go unnoticed.

p.2

designation

The school has begun to create a culture of reading. Pupils at the early stages of reading are identified accurately and supported well to become fluent readers. This means that pupils increasingly feel more confident with reading subject-specific texts in lessons. The school has reorganised some rooms in the building to create reading spaces. The books that pupils read have been carefully selected to reflect their interests. Pupils enjoy reading for pleasure in these comfortable and welcoming areas.

p.2

designation

The provision for pupils’ personal development has improved. The personal, social, health and economic education programme has been redesigned. It is now much stronger than it was in the past. Staff are receiving regular training to help them to deliver this programme consistently well. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe online and in the community. The school has also incorporated work on careers into this programme. This is helping pupils to feel more supported when making choices about their next steps.

p.2

designation

Staff and pupils recognise that the work to improve behaviour is beginning to have an impact. The atmosphere around the school is calm and orderly. Pupils who need support to regulate their behaviour appreciate the help that they receive from staff.

p.2

designation

The school has increased capacity within the attendance team. There are very early signs that attendance rates are beginning to rise for some pupils. Even so, pupils’ overall attendance rate remain low and too many pupils continue to be absent for considerable periods of time. The school has used the support from the local authority effectively. This support has been deployed to tackle the weaknesses outlined in the previous inspection. The school has also benefitted from its partnership with other local schools to develop the design of the curriculum.

p.2

designation

Staff feel well supported, even though there have been new ways of working introduced in a relatively short space of time. Morale is high because staff can see the difference that these changes are making to the school. Following training, governors have an improved, understanding of their roles and responsibilities. This is helping to build leadership capacity across the school.

p.3

designation

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of governors, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Sefton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion