Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

North Mead Primary Academy

Inspected 25 Jan 2024 · published 22 Mar 2024 · URN 141221

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Luella Manssen

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Jan 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Luella Manssen

  • Postcode verified

    LE4 9DL

  • Name on report verified

    North Mead Primary Academy

  • URN verified

    141221

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationshappyexemplarystronghighly effectiveeffectivelyinspirationaloutstanding
Criticismseriousconcernsstrugglelower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings870w+91
  • Safeguarding317w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,184
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Safeguarding 19%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: North Mead Primary Academy Northfield Road, Leicester, Leicestershire LE4 9DL

p.1

Inspection dates: 24 and 25 January 2024

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might be outstanding if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

Outcome

The headteacher of this school is Ben Burpitt. This school is part of The Mead Educational Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Sarah Ridley, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Anthony Glover.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

North Mead is a joyful and aspirational primary school. Pupils feel safe and happy. One pupil, typical of many, commented, ‘All the teachers are really kind here. They understand what I am feeling. The teachers are fun, and the lessons are fun too.’

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high expectations for all pupils to reach their individual potential and achieve well. This includes those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and those who are disadvantaged. The school has created an ambitious curriculum that reflects the diversity of the school community. Pupils learn about protected characteristics and fundamental British values throughout a range of subjects.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ behaviour is exemplary. Staff have consistently high expectations. Pupils engage well in lessons and show high levels of focus towards their studies. Pupils talk about their learning with excitement and pride. A range of support is in place for any pupils who struggle to manage their behaviour. This is highly successful.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

During playtimes and lunchtimes, pupils play happily alongside each other. Some pupils are in the ‘Kindness Crew’. They check that everyone is happy and has someone to play with or an activity to take part in. Pupils are unfailingly polite and well mannered. 24 and 25 January 2024

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Children get off to a strong start in the early years. The nursery provision and the Reception Year classrooms are well resourced, both indoors and outdoors. Children have the opportunity to learn through play. There is a sharp focus on the development of communication and early language. The school has its own speech and language therapist, and staff have access to appropriate training. As a result, adult and child interactions are highly effective. Staff skilfully model new vocabulary and encourage and support children’s conversation development.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school prioritises reading. Those who are learning to read swiftly receive the help they need. Extra phonics sessions are in place, which helps some pupils keep up with the phonics programme and succeed. Reading books are matched effectively to the sounds that pupils are learning. Pupils become confident, fluent readers. They explore a diverse range of authors and genres. They understand these carefully chosen texts well. Teachers read to pupils daily. Pupils enjoy these interactive sessions.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Mathematics lessons provide pupils with the opportunity to develop their fluency, reasoning and problem-solving skills. Lessons provide opportunities for pupils to recall previous learning or deepen their thinking. One pupil explained: ‘After we finish an activity, we have a reflect question. This recaps what we covered and helps us remember. Then we get to do a deeper challenge.’ Staff model new calculations and encourage the use of the right vocabulary effectively.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The wider curriculum is rich and well thought through. There is clear progression mapped out, which shows what pupils should know and be able to do in each year group and each subject. The school has explicitly identified the important knowledge and skills that pupils should learn. Teachers plan in opportunities to check how well pupils can recall their knowledge. This helps pupils to know and remember more of the planned curriculum. Pupils speak about their learning with confidence and enthusiasm.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils’ diverse backgrounds are celebrated throughout the curriculum. They have many chances to learn about different cultures, languages and faiths. Pupils value this. As a result, pupils’ understanding of the British values of respect and tolerance is well developed and mature.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The ‘Removing Barriers Team’ makes sure that pupils get the support they need to be happy, safe and able to learn. This team has developed strong links with a range of organisations that can offer pupils and their families extra help. Pupils with SEND are well supported and achieve the best possible outcomes.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils access a wide range of clubs, including knitting and debating. They have the opportunity to take on additional responsibilities, such as becoming a member of the pupil leadership team. The school wants to broaden pupils’ horizons. Additional funding is used effectively to provide a wealth of inspirational opportunities. This includes all trips and the school’s breakfast club.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school is well led and managed. Staff feel very well supported by leaders on a professional and personal level. Staff state that they feel ‘invested in and appreciated’. 24 and 25 January 2024

p.2

3

There is a wealth of professional opportunities available for staff. This includes numerous chances to network with colleagues more widely across the trust. Members of the trust board and academy council communicate well. They fully understand and undertake their responsibilities.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in July 2018.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 24 and 25 January 2024

p.3

Dates of previous inspection

3 and 4 July 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Mead Educational Trust.  The school uses a designated specialist provision at another school within the trust as alternative provision for some pupils.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 24 and 25 January 2024

p.4

5

 The inspector carried out deep dives in reading, mathematics and music. For each deep dive, the inspector discussed the curriculum with leaders, visited lessons, spoke with teachers and pupils, and reviewed samples of pupils’ work.  The inspector listened to some pupils read to a familiar adult.  The inspector checked the work pupils had produced, reviewed curriculum plans and spoke with pupils and leaders about several other subjects.  The inspector met with leaders responsible for behaviour, personal development, and the provision for pupils with SEND.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector reviewed a range of documents, including the school’s self-evaluation

p.5

5

and improvement plan. The inspector met with members of the local advisory board and trust board.  The inspector met with the director of education and the CEO of the trust.  The inspector considered the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including any free-text comments, as well as the results of Ofsted’s survey for school staff.

p.5

Inspection team

Luella Manssen, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 January 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion