Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Priory Community School

Inspected 21 Feb 2024 · published 20 Mar 2024 · URN 137300

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    21 Feb 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Kelly Olive, Matthew Morgan, Matthew Shanks, Susan Aykin, Teresa Hill

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BS22 6BP

  • Name on report verified

    Priory Community School

  • URN verified

    137300

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivepositivevery effectiveflourishvery wellstrong relationshipsrespectful
Criticismstruggleconcernnot effectivelysuspensions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings911w+66
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
894
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of Priory Community School Queensway, Weston-Super-Mare, Somerset, BS22 6BP

p.1

Inspection dates: 20 to 21 February 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The principal of this school is Angelos Markoutsas. This school is part of The Priory Learning Trust which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, William Roberts and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Kate Dominy. 20–21 February 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils like coming to Priory Community School. Pupils are generally kind, empathetic and respectful. One pupil’s comment echoed that of many others, ‘You can be whoever you want to be at this school’. Pupils feel safe and well cared for. They have strong relationships with staff and, if they have a concern, they are confident that staff will support them. Pupils with education, health and care (EHC) plans receive effective support to enable them to flourish.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Through the curriculum, pupils develop their characters well. The personal, social and health education (PSHE) programme is well structured and supports pupils to learn about the world beyond school. Pupils are knowledgeable about the concept of consent and healthy relationships. The careers programme is mapped carefully from Year 7, so pupils develop strong knowledge about their next steps by Year 11.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils value the rich extra-curricular offer of sports and cultural clubs, such as yoga, football and music. Pupils visit places linked to their learning, such as Vatican City State for religious studies. The school provides tailored opportunities to meet both pupils’ interests and their learning needs. For example, some pupils learn to repair bicycles.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils develop strong leadership skills. Some pupils become pupil ambassadors and are great advocates of the school. Others are part of the eco committee who support environmental initiatives, such as planting trees around the school site.

p.2

better?

Pupils learn a well-structured curriculum that supports them to build complex knowledge as they move through the school. Pupils regularly reflect on what they know, before moving onto more complex concepts. For example, pupils learn about a breadth of texts in English which supports their growing understanding of how writers craft their ideas.

p.2

better?

Teachers have strong subject knowledge. The well-organised programme of professional development for all staff strengthens their teaching skills further. Pupils with complex special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are very well supported by teaching that helps them to succeed. However, some pupils, particularly disadvantaged pupils, do not learn as well as their peers. This is because their literacy needs are not fully met in some subjects. Although the school teaches phonics and pupils listen to a range of texts, there is not a coherent approach to developing pupils’ early reading skills, or their enjoyment of reading. Consequently, some pupils struggle to read, write and talk about what they have learned.

p.2

better?

The school’s approach to managing pupils’ behaviour is effective. Staff adopt a positive and personalised approach. They prioritise the social and emotional well- being of pupils. Consequently, the behaviour of pupils is good. The impact of the school’s work has led to a reduction in the high proportion of suspensions evident 20–21 February 2024

p.2

3

historically. However, the school acknowledges that pupils, particularly disadvantaged pupils, do not attend well. Leaders use a breadth of co-ordinated strategies to improve the attendance of pupils. For example, leaders liaise closely with parents, carers and pupils to ensure that they recognise the correlation between school attendance and future life chances. However, it is too early to judge the impact of this approach.

p.3

3

Governance is very effective. The board of trustees and the academy council gather a plethora of information with which to hold the school to account and to provide support. Staff are overwhelmingly positive about working in the school. They are very positive about the support they have for their well-being and workload. They are very proud to work at the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, struggle to learn the curriculum successfully and confidently. They struggle to read, write and talk about what they have learned. The school must ensure that staff support pupils with the reading, writing and talking requirements of their specific subjects so that all pupils achieve well.  Some pupils, particularly disadvantaged pupils, do not attend school regularly. Consequently, these pupils do not learn effectively. The school must work closely with parents and carers to ensure that such pupils understand the link between school attendance and future life chances so attend regularly.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need 20–21 February 2024

p.3

4

of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 20–21 February 2024

p.4

School details

Type of school Secondary Comprehensive School category Academy converter

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1513

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 6 November 2014

p.5

Information about this school

 Priory Community School is a member of the Priory Learning Trust.  The proportion of pupils with education, health and care (EHC) plans is above the national average.  The school uses two registered and one unregistered alternative provider.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 7 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical educational qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision. 20–21 February 2024

p.5

6

 Inspectors held discussions with the principal and members of the leadership team.  An inspector held discussions with the chief executive officer, the director of sec- ondary education for the trust, two members of the board of trustees and the governing body.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, modern foreign languages, geography, science and physical education. In each subject, inspectors met with senior and curriculum leaders, talked to pupils, visited lessons, spoke to teachers and looked at examples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with staff to consider their views.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors considered the views of parents and carers who responded to the

p.6

6

confidential questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View. They evaluated the views of staff and pupils from the Ofsted online questionnaires.

p.6

Inspection team

Susan Aykin, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Kelly Olive His Majesty's Inspector 20–21 February 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion